User talk:Stewacide
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hi!
Glad you like the Ford stuff - hope we (with User:Morven) can gat wiki-autos in shape. how about Category:Ford engines? --Stephen 10:39, Aug 7, 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Sports Cars
Some SAABs belong in the sport car category so it would be wrong to say that they "obviously don't belong". Not all SAABs are obviously sport cars, the 92 and 93 obviously isn't. The Sonett and GT750 obviously are. Some others like the 99 (EMS and Turbo), 900 and 9-3 (especially the Viggen) are perhaps more of grand tourer than pure sport cars, but the definition is hard to pin down. // Liftarn
- Yeah, I agree about the Sonett, etc. It just seemed strange/wrong that EVERY Saab was added. -- stewacide
-
- Not every SAAB was added, just those the sporty ones (or where a sporty version was available). For instance I didn't add Saab 95 (obviously not sporty) or Saab Junior (race car, not sport car). I did add Saab 99 where versions like EMS and turbo obviously are sporty while models like the 99L aren't (altough it has quite a revvy engine). I hope it's a bit clearer now. // Liftarn
[edit] Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
- Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
- Multi-Licensing Guide
- Free the Rambot Articles Project
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
- Option 1
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
OR
- Option 2
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)
[edit] User Categorisation
You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Ontario page as living in or being associated with Ontario. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Ontario for instructions.--Rmky87 04:43, 10 October 2005 (UTC)