User talk:Steveprutz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is Steveprutz's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Steveprutz.

Contents

[edit] Item

I do not check this page often. Better to find me through email (if you can crack the code). StevePrutz (talk) 06:47, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Commentary

[edit] RFC

Hello. I noticed that you put a wikilink for Returned for Collection in RFC. Note that WP:WINAD indicates that Wikipedia is not a dictionary, so we don't need to define every possible term. Sincer there is no Returned for Collection article, I think that listing "Returned for Collection" in RFC would only be useful if there is another, broader article that includes "Returned for Collection" to which we could refer people for explanation. Alternatively, if you feel "Returned for Collection" merits it, you could create an article, or a section in an existing article, and the disambiguation page could redirect there. Also, and I didn't find this intuitive myself so I mention it, WP:MOSDP indicates that disambiguation pages are not for exploration but to quickly guide people looking for the title term. ENeville 17:25, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Spoilers

I see you've run afoul of the small number of editors devoted to removing each and every spoiler tag on Wikipedia. They're disproportionately composed of admins, and have a habit of banning people who interfere with their objective, so don't get drawn into edit warring with them. However, your perspective on Wikipedia Talk:Spoiler would be welcome.--Nydas(Talk) 16:29, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikilinks

Hi,

Note that it is not necessary to wikilink any modifiers after a wikilink proper - [[Cats]] and [[Cat]]s both look like Cats, though the second one is preferred (in my mind) because it leads directly to the article rather than through a redirect. WLU 18:50, 29 October 2007 (UTC)