User talk:Steveha
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] your editing of the tour de france article
i just noticed that someone reverted your recent change of the tour de france article and they noted as the reason 'vandalism'. i don't think that is what you intended but i do have a guess as to why someone else might have misundertood your contribution. you did not mention second in importance to what other event. and, its just not a strong enough sentence; especially for the article intro. just my $0.02. uri budnik 08:58, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- No one reverted any of my edits. The sentence deleted was added several edits down from my own edits. All I did was create an article explaining the General Classification, and then make those words link to the new article. I do not know what the deal was with that sentence; it was added anonymously, and I agree that it should not be in there. --Steveha 05:10, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-
- my bad. i was looking in the history where an anon person deleted that sentence and i incorrectly thought it was you. i just looked again and i guess i must have been confused. sorry. uri budnik 05:32, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-
-
- No need to apologize. Thanks for taking the time to tell me about it! --Steveha 07:02, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-