User talk:Steve8675309

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Quixtar

Removing poorly worded not particularly relevant text and explaining the reason in Talk is not exactly "vandalism" and I don't appreciate the accusation. --Insider201283 11:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

I didn't see anything on the talk page other than unreferenced speculation regarding companies other than Quixtar. Perhaps you could explain again why a major news story about Dr. Phil and Quixtar doesn't belong in a section about Dr. Phil and Quixtar.
Did you know that many people think Quixtar is an unscrupulous organization? I recommend the following web site if you want to learn about Quixtar: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Amway/. Enjoy!
Well, I'm off to check out what's new with the DeVos presidential campaign (http://www.devosforpresident.com/). Have a nice day!
Steve8675309 13:48, 2 December 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Request for Comment: Verifiability as to the creator of the Rosa Luxemburg drawing

In preparation for an RFC at [WP:RFC/BIO] on the verifiability of the attribution of the the Rosa Luxemburg drawing to Ward Churchill, I have placed the appropriate section on the [1] page. There is a location available for Statements by editors previously involved in dispute. I have placed this notice on the talk page of the editors previously involved in the dispute to allow time for supplying these comments prior to requesting broad input from the Wikipedia community. Uncle uncle uncle 00:01, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Does the source provided for [2] satisfy the Wikipedia policies and guidelines [WP:RS], [WP:V], and [WP:CITE] to support the claim that the drawing was created by Ward Churchill?

[edit] Your edits to Ward Churchill 9/11 essay controversy

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Steve8675309! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but please note that the link you added in is on my spam blacklist and should not be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an Imageshack or Photobucket image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 13:54, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and will be removed. Thanks. Shadowbot 14:07, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Shadowbot

Is there any way you can cite this document without linking to a Google Cache page? Shadow1 (talk) 14:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

It's not Google Cache that's triggering the bot, it's the fact that you're linking to the cache page with an IP address. I would recommend linking directly to the document, rather than to a cache of said document.
Shadowbot's definition of 'spam' is slightly broad. A more appropriate definition might be an 'anti-link bot'. Shadow1 (talk) 14:44, 27 January 2007 (UTC)


Please stop spamming Wikipedia. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing. Shadowbot 14:21, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mediation

Coolgamer has requested a medition cabal case to sort out your disagreement on the United Airlines Flight 93 article at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-12-17 United Airlines Flight 93 and I've offered to take it.--Phoenix-wiki talk ยท contribs 17:29, 17 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Nct vary ncp.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Nct vary ncp.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:33, 8 February 2008 (UTC)