User talk:Stereo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome to the Wikipedia

Welcome, newcomer!

Here are some useful tips to ease you into the Wikipedia experience:


Also, here are some odds and ends that I find useful from time to time:


ClockworkTroll 02:03, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Stirling Newberry 12:38, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC) thanks, typing isn't my strong suit.

[edit] Reminder

When you take part in Talk discussion, add new sectiosn at the BOTTOM of the page and remeber to sign your posts. I have replied at Talk:Partitions of Poland. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 00:48, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

Note to self: I really have to sign my edits in the talk page. I constantly forget, and apologise in advance if you came here after seeing one of my edits. --Stereo 12:16, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] TIA/EIA-568B color codes

Thanks for your recent addition to TIA-568A/B. The table and image are very useful.

Unfortunately, the colors represented do not match the standard. Perhaps you could correct the table and drawing? In both the T568A and T568B termination standards (both current in TIA/EIA-568B), there are no color/white conductors - only white/color and solid color.

For example, the T568B termination standard is: white/orange, orange, white/green, blue, white/blue, green, white/brown, brown.

dpotter 18:58, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

I recently noticed that you made the same edits, on the RJ45 page, which also needs fixup. dpotter 15:58, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
You are absolutely right. I had noticed this, but then forgotten about it. The error is common to pretty much all wikipedia articles related to ethernet, as can be seen on the page on the mythical orange-white cable. All that stuff should be merged in one place, really. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stereo (talk • contribs)

[edit] Awesome

You could have given me a barnstar :P The awesome thing was difficult to format ;) Btw, Userboxes should be "subst"'d. with the exception of babel boxes. See WP:TGS. And if you understood half of what I wrote there you edit Wikipedia too much :) - FrancisTyers · 12:03, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

:)) - FrancisTyers · 14:04, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lactose intolerance

I thought you argued well re removal of Lactose intolerance#Lactase-enzyme medication section, given that "citation needed" tags had been lying throughout :-) I found a few more PubMed refs, certainly enough to verify discussion of the various products (pre-hydrolysed, liquid and tablets forms) and how they fit in with overall management approaches. So I have reinserted the section, but with a considerable rewrite - let me know what you think :-) Yours David Ruben Talk 01:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Embargo

I put up an announcement of this new planet yesterday, and it was deleted per Wikipedia desire not to breach the embargo on the news from ESO. The embargo is until 19:00 ET today, so please be patient. Since the embargo has been leaking like a sieve, I've been deleting stuff all day; but I think we should, for the sake of good public relations for Wikipedia, respect it. Vegasprof 20:51, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gliese 581 c: radius

I removed the radius value from Gliese 581 c, because I find it very hard to believe that “about 50% bigger” translates to an occlusion area exactly 50% greater – this would be one of the greatest coincidences in the history of the universe. -Ahruman 22:02, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Striking your vote

Hello Stereo,

Thank you for your interest in the Wikimedia Board Election. The Election Committee regretfully informs you that your previous vote was received in error and will be struck according to the election rules, described below.

The Election Committee regretfully announces today that we will have to remove approximately 220 votes submitted. These votes were cast by people not entitled to vote. The election rules state that users must have at least 400 edits by June 1 to be eligible to vote.

The voter lists we sent to Software in the Public Interest (our third party election partner) initially were wrong, and one of your account was eventually included to our initial list. There was a bug in the edit counting program and the sent list contained every account with 201 or more edits, instead of 400 or more edits. So large numbers of people were qualified according to the software who shouldn't be. The bug has been fixed and an amended list was sent to SPI already.

Our first (and wrong) list contains 80,458 accounts as qualified. The proper number of qualified voters in the SPI list is now 52,750. As of the morning of July 4 (UTC), there are 2,773 unique voters and 220 people, including you, have voted who are not qualified based upon this identified error.

In accordance with voting regulations the Election Committee will strike those approximately 220 votes due to lack of voting eligibility. The list of struck votes is available at https://wikimedia.spi-inc.org/index.php/List_of_struck_votes.

We are aware of the possibility that some of the people affected may have other accounts with more than 400 edits, and hence may still be eligible to vote. We encourage you to consider voting again from another account, if you have one. If you have no other account eligible to vote, we hope you reach the criteria in the next Election, and expect to see your participation to the future Elections.

Your comments, questions or messages to the Committee would be appreciated, you can make them at m:Talk:Board elections/2007/en. Other language versions are available at m:Translation requests/Eleccom mail, 07-05.

Again, we would like to deeply apologize for any inconvenience.

Sincerely,
Kizu Naoko
Philippe
Jon Harald Søby
Newyorkbrad
Tim Starling


For Wikimedia Board Election Steering Committee