User talk:Steinhauer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Steinhauer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
[edit] Your recent article creation
Please do not add inappropriate material to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered Wikipedia:Vandalism. See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Michaelbusch 17:56, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Michaelbush, Please explain to me what the inappropriate material is which I supposedly added to my article creation, which caused you to remove the entire article. I can back up all the scientific statements which I made. If you are referring to the comment that both, Classical Mechanics and Quantum Mechanics fail to give a satisfactory answer on the electromagnetic wave theory, I can't see why I should be penalized for that, since a lot of people in the scientific community hold the same opinion. I thought that Wikipedia welcomed logical thinking and new ideas. If we only rehash old ideas and quote what someone else said before, then what is the point, other encyclopaedias are doing that already.
So please let me know what I did wrong. Steinhauer:Steinhauer 20:40, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- See Wikipedia:No original research. Michaelbusch 00:04, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Michaelbush My article was not all based on original research, but I must admit that some of the statements I made were based on logical assumptions on facts we do know. So I guess I should watch myself more closely in this regard in the future.
- Steinhauer 01:53, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Günter Nimtz
Well, I'll retract the word "dubious" if that is the issue (I wasn't talking about the quote, though, I was talking about "An actual statement that nothing can move faster than the speed of light is not found in his book"). As for "I added the text just to see what people would do with it.", I'm not sure what to make of that, but I guess you saw that my reaction was to move it to the talk page. Maybe someone else will have a different reaction. Kingdon 17:07, 18 September 2007 (UTC)