User talk:Stefanmg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] License tagging for Image:Suton BP.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Suton BP.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:08, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:BPPRED.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BPPRED.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

[edit] Bačka Palanka

Pa ne možeš tek tako ubacivati slike na Vikipediju. Slike koje ubaciš treba da imaju naznačen izvor odakle dolaze i definisan status u vezi sa autorskim pravima. Znači na tim slikama što si ubacio kod Bačke Palanke treba to da napišeš ili će biti obrisane. Vidiš već da su te upozorili ovde u vezi tih slika. Kažem ti ovo jer si ubacio više slika bez definisanog izvora i definisanih autorskih prava i one će uskoro biti obrisane ako taj status ne definišeš. Samo te molim da ne ubacuješ više takvih slika. U svakom slučaju, na Vikipediju uglavnom ne možeš stavljati slike koje si našao na drugim sajtovima jer one uglavnom nisu slobodne za upotrebu. Najbolje je da staviš slike čiji si ti autor i da ih označiš slobodnim za korišćenje. PANONIAN (talk) 17:29, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stefanmg

Ne znam kako sad da promenim, PANONIAN. To sam našao na sajtu opštine (nije zaštićeno autorskim pravima) ali sam zaboravio to da napomenem... To su prve dve slike koje sam uploadovao, pa se još nisam snašao

Pa vidi ovako: odeš na stranicu svake slike koju si ubacio na Vikipediju i tamo napišeš da si ih uzeo sa sajta opštine i staviš link do stranice sajta opštine odakle si ih uzeo. To je u vezi porekla slike. Što se tiče autorskih prava, treba da odeš na ovu stranicu: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags Znači ako slike nisu zaštićene autorskim pravima, onda nađeš tamo oznaku za to i staviš na stranicu slika koje si ubacio. Moraš na svakoj slici koju si ubacio definisati njeno poreklo i autorska prava da je ne bi obrisali. PANONIAN (talk) 21:35, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Pomerio sam labudove i Crkvu. Lepše izgleda ovako... Da uklonim Kertesa? Nije baš ličnost kojom bi grad mogao da se ponosi.... Stefanmg (talk) 16:37, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Za poznate ličnosti ne znam, to uredi kako misliš da je bolje, ali članak ne izgleda dobro kad su slike levo. Prvo, praksa je da slika ne bude na početku članka pre teksta, već da svaki članak počinje sa svojim uvodnim delom a ne sa slikom. Takođe nije estetski da jedna slika bude levo a druga desno. Slike obično stoje pored teksta i stavljaju se ili levo ili desno od teksta. Mislim da pri sadašnjoj koncepciji članka neće dobro izgledati da bilo koju sliku stavimo levo. Mislim da bi prvo trebalo proširiti malo članak da ima više teksta, onda ćemo naći i prostora da neku sliku stavimo levo gde neće smetati drugoj slici ili tabeli. Inače me zanima u vezi ovih podataka o etničkom sastavu Gajdobre, jesu li to podaci sa nekog popisa? PANONIAN (talk) 21:35, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Popis iz '91. Dodaću i ostala sela posle 20. kad se vratim sa odmora Molim te, sredi članak o Kalman Konradu. Nemam vremena pošto se pakujem. Stefanmg (talk) 12:59, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Pa sređen članak uglavnom podrazumeva da članak ima kategoriju i viki poveznice (linkove ka drugim člancima). Dodao sam kategoriju kod Kalman Konrada, a kad se vratiš sa odmora možeš dodati više poveznica. Ja se uglavnom bavim geografskim i istorijskim člancima, a ovo je više vezano za sport. Inače, ako ti bude još nešto trebalo, kontaktiraj me preko moje stranice za razgovor koju redovno proveram. PANONIAN (talk) 19:46, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Odgovor

Pa probaj napisati članak o tom ekološkom društvu. Moj rođak je napisao članak o svojoj muzičkoj grupi pa su mu obrisali pod izgovorom da nisu dovoljno poznati. Članci o slabo poznatim stvarima se često brišu, mada i ne postoji neki jasan kriterijum šta je poznato a šta ne. Uglavnom, ako ti neko bude pravio problem, trebalo bi da imaš kako da dokažeš koliko je društvo poznato ili značajno. PANONIAN (talk) 17:38, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Usage of the User Monty Python userbox

Hello there...I have come up with a whole slew of new usages for the User Monty Python userbox. They are currently located in my sandbox. I would like your opinion before I put them up for general consumption, and if you have any other suggestions, please let me know.
—Lady Aleena talk/contribs 21:53, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

First, please sign your posts on talk pages. Not everyone is eagerly awaiting messages and needing to respond quickly.

Second, the images are probably at their individual articles, but if you are talking about switching the foot with an image of the Python, well, that is really tricky, and I am not sure I want to attempt it at this time. - LA @ 08:26, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] B. Palanka

Evo, napisao sam članke o svim selima u opštini, pa ih slobodno dopuni nekim podacima vezanim za istoriju ili kulturu. PANONIAN (talk) 16:42, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Knjigu sa popisa 2002 sam nabavio u Beogradu, u Republičkom Zavodu za Statistiku. Ako ti treba, to je jedino mesto gde je možeš nabaviti. :) Ako ti baš treba podatak za neko određeno mesto, mogu ti ja pogledati. PANONIAN (talk) 17:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Userboxes consolidation support

What's on the slab Do not use these templates yet

You have recently either supported my userbox consolidation efforts or at least applauded them. Currently, I am putting together another larger batch of userbox deletions which will have master templates. (The master templates are not "live" yet.) Would you be willing to support me in this and any future consolidations? There will probably be a lot of resistance at first to this, so having a group of people supporting me would be greatly appreciated.

At the moment, 5 master userboxes are in the works to replace 72. That may increase significantly if I can get the sixth one to work as I would like. Some of the templates to be replaced are widely used, but with the consolidated templates there is more funcitionability.

Please let me know, you can click [edit] above as this conversation is transcluded to all.

Sent to: Aeon1006, Andrew c, BigDT, Billpg, Brian Olsen, Cyde, Gperrow, Khaosworks, Luna Santin, Marcus-e, MiraLuka, NKSCF, Pegasus1138, Phil Boswell, Plange, RedZebra, Rfrisbie, Riana dzasta, Stefanmg, and Tuspm
—Lady Aleena talk/contribs 22:02, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Hmm, that's an interesting use of transclusion. :) Can't promise I'll always vote to support, but I imagine that in many cases I will. Feel free to let me know when you post them (I tend not to watch TfD too often), and as always I'll be more than willing to lend what technical advice I can. Luna Santin 22:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi Lady Aleena, as noted in an earlier discussion with you, I think consolidation is fine for thematically related userboxes. However, I also support diversity through mass customization, so I'm more inclined to support consolidations that maintain display differences in images, colors and especially wordings. That's easy enough to do with parser functions. I wish you all the best. Regards, Rfrisbie^talk 22:16, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

As per the two posts above, I might very likely support it but I'll determine it on a case by case basis. Pegasus1138^{Talk | Contribs | Email} ---- 22:18, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

I don't overly care too terribly much. I will say that I think having generic userboxes is a good thing from one standpoint - it helps newbies learn Wikicode. If you can't just add {{User Hokie}} to your page but instead have optional parameters like {{User Hokie|year=2001|border=maroon|major=CS}}, that's definitely a good thing. BigDT 22:21, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Same here - case by case. I only voted on the Doctor Who box because it was part of the Wikiproject, anyway. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 22:25, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Just let me know when you need my support LA, Most od th eboxes I use are aprt of a wikiproject anyways or made myself Aeon ^{Insane Ward} 23:49, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

I don't use userboxes, I only got into this because of the Doctor Who project. But I'd take a look on a case by case basis, certainly. --Brian Olsen 02:09, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

I agree with BigDT. Userboxes with optional parameters taught me how to use Wikicode. A master template isn't a bad idea... hell, it should be like that for most userboxes. — riana_dzasta • t • c • e • 02:24, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

I do like this use of transclusion. I think I'll vote on a case by case basis, but I do like and support the idea as a whole. —Mi ra 02:38, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

I'd also take a look on a case-by-base basis. --Gperrow 17:46, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

I have appreciated your efforts so far and will extend my support to similar "consolidation" projects. RedZebra 13:59, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

If you know of anyone who may be interested in this, just transclude this to their talk page as it is transcluded to yours. - LA @ 06:09, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Thumbs up! Stefanmg 11:49, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Whoa ... time travel! ;) BigDT 12:44, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Sorry... I always copy some of previous posts. It's easier... I just forgot to change the date Stefanmg 17:49, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

So Far I like what you have done! See your Talk page to find out How much! Aeon ^{Insane Ward} 20:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

One concern I have about this form of communication on a topic that admittedly might be controversial is the potential for accusations of recruiting for votestacking. What are others' views on this? Rfrisbie^talk 21:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

I had wondered about this, but unless I am mistaken, this is an uncontroversial tidy up operation. Stephen B Streater 21:33, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

As a lot of you have said, you will take my recommendations on a case by case basis. That tells me that you are ready, willing, and able to tell me when I have crossed the line. - LA @ 21:38, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

This is just anticipating a potential issue so you can prepare for it. If anyone ever puts up a stink, you might want to disclose this page is here. But then again, it might never come up. :-) Rfrisbie^talk 21:57, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Since we don't vote on Wikipedia it should not be an issue hopefully. Aeon ^{Insane Ward} 00:38, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Other consolidations

[edit] Myers-Briggs

ENFJ: 26
ENFP: 48
ENTJ: 30
ENTP: 46
ESFJ: 15
ESFP: 7
ESTJ: 19
ESTP: 8
INFJ: 43
INFP: 80
INTJ: 135
INTJ2: 45
INTP: 151
INTP2: 34
ISFJ: 13
ISFP: 13
ISTJ: 69
ISTP: 42

Rfrisbie...have you thought about getting your Myers-Briggs templates deleted in favor of the combined one that Thadman created? That would be another 18 deleted. I did a survey of how many people were using each...

Some people have more than one of these on their user pages, so some of those are duplicates. I know that some look like a lot of people use them, but once we get people migrating from individual templates to master templates, it will get easier and easier to consolidate them. Hopefully we can keep user templates in Template space if we can show that we can police them. - LA @ 22:48, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi LA, of course, we all know they're not “my” templates. I just moved some to userspace as part of the effort to find a userbox compromise most people could live with. I wasn’t kidding when I said I support diversity in userboxes. Although I think Thadman’s userbox {{User:The Thadman/Userbox/MBTI}} is cool, it displays differently than the others – only one color scheme with a set of profile scores – and it doesn’t use categories . I don’t have any problem with it or another template designed to consolidate the existing features of the other boxes for “elegance” reasons, as long as no features are lost. However, I do not see a “need” to do it. On a web site that went from 1 million articles to over 1.25 million in about four months, I really consider the number of userbox pages to be a non-issue. I’m also not aware of any material debates on keeping userboxes in templatespace if someone polices them. Maybe you can show me a link or two on that. In this particular case, it’s even more superfluous because all personality boxes already are in userspace (User:Rfrisbie/Userboxes/Personality) and the Wikipedia directory page was deleted. [1] Rfrisbie^talk 02:08, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

See my comments on GUS on the WikiProject Userboxes talk page. - LA @ 11:49, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the link. What that shows me is that you are very well-intentioned in your efforts, your rationale for this process as a means to keep userboxes in template space is not supported by consensus, and the specific case of the Myers-Briggs templates does not apply, since they already are ugly in userspace. Sorry, I'm still not convinced of the need or consensus to do this. However, if you're still interested in combining the boxes for "efficiency," without changing the displays or categories, it's fine with me. Rfrisbie^talk 12:13, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Unfortunately I have only gotten one reply to my initial statement. I wish that more people would comment for I really want to keep user templates in the template space. I will never use a user template in user space. - LA @ 22:37, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Sorry about that LA I have been dealing with other issues, I agree with what your doing it should make things a lot simpler. Aeon ^{Insane Ward} 17:40, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] LOTR

I've found a few more that may be worth consolidating: the LOTR userboxes. Luna Santin 02:54, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

I was looking at those, however the merged template would have to have standardized wording. I will give it a good think. - LA @ 04:06, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Live master user templates

I have made four of those master templates live. I will not start the TfD process on the ones they are replacing for at least a week. I want to see how well they catch on without a TfD first. However, do you think that I could slip a little note onto the to be TfDd templates noting the new master without too much censure. The message would be in the box appearing on the user pages like a TfD, but not as obtrusive. - LA @ 06:14, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Might be a good idea. What do the others think? Æon ^{Insane Ward} 06:24, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Go for it. — riana_dzasta • t • c • e • 11:14, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Some of the card game user templates have been marked with a message about the master template. The ones which are of different design are not marked as of yet. - LA @ 22:47, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Templates for deletion in progress

Here are the TfDs in progress...

August 7

~~User chess variants~~

~~Card game user templates~~

~~Idol series user templates~~

~~Newspaper types user templates~~

August 11

~~Prison Break~~

~~Law & Order series~~

Go take a look and tell the community what you think. - LA @ 07:08, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Checked them out, went delete on all. Great Job LA! Æon ^{Insane Ward} 20:26, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lady Aleena's userbox consolidation desk

If you find a group of userboxes which you think could be merged, place them on my userbox desk. Please alphabetalize them over the Edit section with NEW in the section name so it stands out a bit. I currently have 6 projects there. - LA @ 00:07, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] More user template deletions

To those who are still watching this, please see Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 August 25/User templates and give your opinion. - LA @ 08:14, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Popis

E izvini, nemam trenutno vremena da stavim podatke sa popisa 2002 za sva sela u BP opštini. Podaci iz 1991 se ovde baš ne razlikuju previše od onih iz 2002, tako da nije problem ni da imamo podatke iz 1991. Ako nađem vremena dodaću i podatke iz 2002, ali ništa ne obećavam, jer imam i druga posla. :) PANONIAN (talk) 20:56, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Obrovac

Reci mi samo šta si hteo da kažeš sa ovim u članku o Obrovcu: "In 1698, people who left Metković (now Nova Gajdobra)." Pa šta je bilo sa tim ljudima? Nisi dovršio rečenicu. :) Pretpostavljam da su se doselili u Obrovac, tako? PANONIAN (talk) 01:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Ok, ja sam to već popravio, samo sam hteo da proverim jesam li dobro uradio. :) PANONIAN (talk) 13:11, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wiki Projekt Serbia

Pa ne treba da uradiš ništa posebno da se uključiš u projekat. Samo odeš na stranicu projekta i upišeš svoje ime u spisak učesnika u projektu: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Serbia I to ti je to. :) PANONIAN (talk) 18:47, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] SSSS

Stvarno ne znam da li je pravilnije reći "spašava" ili "spasava". Pošto se u srpskom obe reči koriste, verovatno su obe i pravilne. :) PANONIAN (talk) 23:40, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Halil Asani

Halil Asani iz ČSK-a je označen kao državljanin Albanije. To mi deluje prilično neobično. Jesi li siguran u to da nije Albanac iz Srbije? Pozdrav.--Vitriden 15:59, 12 August 2006 (UTC) P.S. Sad videh ovo iznad, po Ivanu Klajnu, pravilno je spasava (od spasti), a spašava i spasiti predstavljaju hrvatizme.

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Ivica Kralj.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ivica Kralj.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 23:46, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tamo daleko

Pa ono što je tom članku potrebno nije više informacija, već da se pesma prevede na engleski. Ipak je ovo engleska vikipedija i mislim da je korisnik Nekohakase ovu pesmu predložio za brisanje upravo zato što nije bila prevedena na engleski. Ja nemam sada vremena da to prevodim, ali ti bi je mogao prevesti ako želiš. Za ovakve članke o pesmama na engleskoj vikipediji je bitno da imaju stihove i na srpskom i na engleskom, odnosno da sadrže originalni tekst na srpskom, ali da to bude prevedeno i za engleske čitaoce jer većini korisnika engleske vikipedije srpski tekst ne znači ništa. PANONIAN (talk) 13:54, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] FK Vojvodina

Zašto si obrisao handball team odavde: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FK_Vojvodina&diff=82977329&oldid=82435710 Koliko ja znam, takav tim postoji, mada nisam siguran. PANONIAN (talk) 03:14, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] wikiproject

As a member of WikiProject Serbia, you should be aware that the project as well as Portal:Serbia is being considered for deletion. If you have the time, please comment on what you feel should be done with the project and the portal. Thank you. // Laughing Man 01:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Čak_je_i_list_veći_od_mene.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Čak_je_i_list_veći_od_mene.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 01:25, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] please note

please note the discussion on the biased name for war in croatia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Croatian_War_of_Independence, which is proposed to be moved to its original title.

[edit] Kosovo: country debate

Hello. There's a discussion going on Talk:List of countries as to whether or not Kosovo should be included in that list. You have an interest in Serbia-related articles and I thought you might be interested. The articles List of countries and Annex to the list of countries (where the inclusion criteria reside) are both relevant. Cheers. DSuser 13:37, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi again. It's probably a minor point, but there a discussion and vote going on at Talk:Kosovo#Kosovo:_terminology as to whether or not it's better to use Kosovo rather than Kosovan or Kosovar in the Wikipedia articles. Perhaps you have no interest, in which case sorry to bother you! DSuser 15:50, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ČSK.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ČSK.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Crkva.jpg

Hi Stefanmg!
We thank you for uploading Image:Crkva.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 16:59, 25 April 2008 (UTC)