User talk:Stefan-Xp

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

My Talk Page... I would prefer, if you use the one in the German WP or on Commons...



I noticed that you've just started here and wished to offer a welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy it and decide to keep contributing.

Let me just give you a few links that are always useful as a handy reference guide:

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question at the village pump or feel free to ask me on my Talk page.
Oh, and just in case you don't already know: to sign your name on a Talk page like I will below, the easiest way is just to type four tildes (~~~~). To customize your signature, look here.
And remember:Be Bold! Marskell 14:51, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Thank You, but I'm only new to the enWP... if there are some major differences to the Commons and the german WP it would be kind, if you get me some hints --Stefan-Xp 14:54, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Structurally and in interface terms I think if you're familiar with related Wikis you should have little trouble navigating this one. The differences may be cultural—how notability and consensus are viewed, for example. This sort of understanding will come with experience. Cheers and let me know if you have any problems or questions. Marskell 15:01, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Thank you! --Stefan-Xp 15:03, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Bundesland-level categories

Hello! I see you are listed in Category:Wikipedians in Germany. I have made subcategories for each Bundesland in case you would like to add yourself to the appropriate one. See Category:Wikipedians in Germany for a list of the subcategories (they use the English names, the same as their Wikipedia articles). --Angr (tɔk) 16:20, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Thank you, I will do it immediately. Is it ok, that I'm in the Category:Wikipedians in Germany and the lower one? --Stefan-Xp 18:35, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:EADS Logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:EADS Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:37, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Continental-Logo.svg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Continental-Logo.svg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:44, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

I tried to use the right template... --Stefan-Xp 16:47, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Nicole deBoer.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nicole deBoer.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 01:22, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Christoph Maria Herbst as Bernd Stromberg.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Christoph Maria Herbst as Bernd Stromberg.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse@ 23:52, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Also, no source is mentioned for the image. If you have any questions, please let me know. – Ilse@ 23:52, 8 September 2007 (UTC)