From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is for proposals related to the Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-04-20 Prem Rawat. User should:
- Add their proposed wording to a new section
- Not sign their section with the standard ~~~~
- Not comment on other sections, this will be done at the discussion page
- Not change the wording of proposals, they should add a new proposal with the changed wording
[edit] Proposal 1
For inclusion in Divine Light Mission#Members
A study of DLM members found that 45% of members had used marijuana daily before joining, while only 7% did so at the time of the study. Seventy-one percent had psychological stress before joining compared to 37% at the time of the study. Overall, 38% had sought profesional help for psychological problems before joining.[1] The same researcher reports that 82% of members were single, 97% were white, and 73% were in their twenties. The percentage of members with Catholic or Protestant backgrounds mirrored the general population, while there were ten times as many members with Jewish backgrounds as in the general population (21% versus 2%). Three-quarters of members had attended college.[2] A different study, of deprogrammed former members, found that 58% were Jewish, 33% Protestant, and 7% Catholic. They first came in contact with the DLM at an average age of 25 and stayed for three years.[3]
|
[edit] Proposal 2
A 1978 study of DLM members by Marc Galanter, based on the responses given by 119 members that received questionnaires, found that after two years, members reported a considerable decline in psychological distress and drug use after joining. The study found that 45% of these surveyed had used marijuana daily before joining, while only 7% did so at the time of the study. Seventy-one percent had psychological stress before joining compared to 37% at the time of the study. Overall, 38% had sought professional help for psychological problems before joining.
These observations led to reveal what Galanter's describes as "an apparent overall improvement in psychiatric state derived from conversion and its retention through continued membership", and that members, whether they were seriously distressed or not before joining, reported an improved emotional state after joining. Galanter reports that 82% of members surveyed were single, 97% were white, and 73% were in their twenties. The percentage of these with Catholic or Protestant backgrounds mirrored the general population, while there were ten times as many members with Jewish backgrounds as in the general population (21% versus 2%). Three-quarters of them had attended college.[4]
[...]
|
[edit] Proposal 3
A 1978 study of DLM members by Marc Galanter, based on the responses given by 119 members that received questionnaires at a festival, found that after two years, members reported a considerable decline in psychological distress and drug use after joining. The study found that 45% of these surveyed had used marijuana daily before joining, while only 7% did so at the time of the study. Seventy-one percent had psychological stress before joining compared to 37% at the time of the study. Overall, 38% had sought professional help for psychological problems before joining. These observations led to reveal what Galanter's describes as "an apparent overall improvement in psychiatric state derived from conversion and its retention through continued membership", and that members, whether they were seriously distressed or not before joining, reported an improved emotional state after joining. Galanter reports that 82% of members surveyed were single, 97% were white, and 73% were in their twenties. The percentage of these with Catholic or Protestant backgrounds mirrored the general population, while there were ten times as many members with Jewish backgrounds as in the general population (21% versus 2%). Three-quarters of them had attended college.[4]
James V. Downton conducted a study of 41 DLM members from three cities and, for comparison, 29 members of the Hare Krishna movement and 40 local college students. Among the DLM members the average age was 23 and ranged from 19 to 29. They came from middle-class backgrounds, all white, and had attended an average of 1.5 years of college, similar to the Hare Krishnas sample, though DLM members were less likely to have come from broken homes. Sixty-five percent of DLM members reported having religious experiences while tripping on LSD. Overall, 95% of DLM membes had used psychedelic drugs, compared to 89% of Hare Krishans and 67% of college students. Compared to the college student sample, fewer DLM members had had religious upbringings and they tended to have had worse family experiences though only 17% came from "broken homes".[5]
|
[edit] Proposal 4
A 1978 study of DLM members by Marc Galanter, based on the responses given by 119 members that received questionnaires at a festival, found that after two years, members reported a considerable decline in psychological distress and drug use after joining. The study found that 45% of these surveyed had used marijuana daily before joining, while only 7% did so at the time of the study. Seventy-one percent had psychological stress before joining compared to 37% at the time of the study. Overall, 38% had sought professional help for psychological problems before joining. These observations led to reveal what Galanter's describes as "an apparent overall improvement in psychiatric state derived from conversion and its retention through continued membership", and that members, whether they were seriously distressed or not before joining, reported an improved emotional state after joining. Galanter reports that 82% of members surveyed were single, 97% were white, and 73% were in their twenties. The percentage of these with Catholic or Protestant backgrounds mirrored the general population, while there were ten times as many members with Jewish backgrounds as in the general population (21% versus 2%). Three-quarters of them had attended college.[4]
James V. Downton conducted a study of 41 DLM members from three cities and, and 40 local college students for comparison. Among the DLM members the average age was 23 and ranged from 19 to 29. They came from middle-class backgrounds, all white, and had attended an average of 1.5 years of college. Sixty-five percent of DLM members reported having religious experiences while tripping on LSD. Overall, 95% of DLM membes had used psychedelic drugs, compared to 67% of college students. Fewer DLM members had had religious upbringings and they tended to have had worse family experiences though only 17% came from "broken homes" in comparison with the college students sample.[6]
|
[edit] Proposal 5
A study of the effects of group cohesiveness carried out by Marc Galanter, based on questionnaire responses given by 119 DLM members attending a festival in 1978, found that after two years involvement with DLM, members reported a considerable decline in psychological distress and drug use compared to their pre membership status. The study found that 45% of those surveyed had used marijuana daily before joining, while only 7% did so at the time of the study. Seventy-one percent reported psychological stress before joining compared to 37% at the time of the study. Overall, 38% had sought professional help for psychological problems before joining. These observations led to what Galanter's describes as "an apparent overall improvement in psychiatric state derived from conversion and its retention through continued membership", and that members, whether they were seriously distressed or not before joining, reported an improved emotional state after joining. Galanter reports that 82% of members surveyed were single, 97% were white, and 73% were in their twenties. The percentage of these with Catholic or Protestant backgrounds mirrored the general population, while there were ten times as many members with Jewish backgrounds as in the general population (21% versus 2%). Three-quarters of them had attended college.[4]
James V. Downton conducted a comparative study of 41 DLM members from three US cities, 29 members of the Hare Krishna movement and 40 college students. Among the DLM members the average age was 23 and ranged from 19 to 29. They came from middle-class backgrounds, all were white and had attended an average of 1.5 years of college, similar to the Hare Krishnas sample, though DLM members were less likely to have come from broken homes. Sixty-five percent of DLM members reported having religious experiences while tripping on LSD. Overall, 95% of DLM members had used psychedelic drugs, compared to 89% of Hare Krishnas and 67% of the college student cohort. Compared to the college students, fewer DLM members had had religious upbringings and they tended to have had worse family experiences though only 17% came from "broken homes".[5]
|
[edit] Proposal 6
A study of group cohesiveness carried out by Marc Galanter, based on questionnaire responses given by 119 DLM members attending a festival in 1978, found that after two years involvement with DLM, members reported a considerable decline in psychological distress and drug use compared to their pre membership status. The study found that 45% of those surveyed had used marijuana daily before joining, while only 7% did so at the time of the study. Seventy-one percent reported psychological stress before joining compared to 37% at the time of the study. Overall, 38% had sought professional help for psychological problems before joining. These observations led to what Galanter's describes as "an apparent overall improvement in psychiatric state derived from conversion and its retention through continued membership", and that members, whether they were seriously distressed or not before joining, reported an improved emotional state after joining. Galanter reports that 82% of members surveyed were single, 97% were white, and 73% were in their twenties. The percentage of these with Catholic or Protestant backgrounds mirrored the general population, while there were ten times as many members with Jewish backgrounds as in the general population (21% versus 2%). Three-quarters of them had attended college.[4]
James V. Downton conducted a comparative study of 41 DLM members from three US cities, 29 members of the Hare Krishna movement and 40 college students. Among the DLM members the average age was 23 and ranged from 19 to 29. They came from middle-class backgrounds, all were white and had attended an average of 1.5 years of college, similar to the Hare Krishnas sample, though DLM members were less likely to have come from broken homes. Sixty-five percent of DLM members reported having religious experiences while tripping on LSD. Overall, 95% of DLM members had used psychedelic drugs, compared to 89% of Hare Krishnas and 67% of the college student cohort. Compared to the college students, fewer DLM members had had religious upbringings and they tended to have had worse family experiences though only 17% came from "broken homes".[5]
|
[edit] Proposal 7
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
|
[edit] Proposal 8
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
|
[edit] Proposal 9
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
|
[edit] Proposal 10
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
|
[edit] Proposal 11
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
|
[edit] Proposal 12
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
|
[edit] Proposal 13
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
|
[edit] Proposal 14
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
|
[edit] Proposal 15
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
|
[edit] References
References |
The following is a discussion that has been placed in a collapse box for improved usability. |
- ^ Galanter, Marc. Cults: Faith, Healing, and Coercion, Oxford University Press, 1989. p.35
- ^ Galanter, Marc. Cults: Faith, Healing, and Coercion, Oxford University Press, 1989. p.23
- ^ Conway, Flo & Siegelman, Jim. Snapping: America's Epidemic of Sudden Personality Change. Stillpoint Press, New York, 1995, 2nd ed. p 360
- ^ a b c Galanter, Marc (1999). Cults: faith, healing, and coercion. Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-512370-0.
- ^ Downton, James V. Sacred Journeys. Columbia University Press, 1979. pp 228-230.
- ^ Downton, James V. Sacred Journeys. Columbia University Press, 1979. pp 228-230.
|
The above is an extended discussion that has been collapsed for improved usability. |