Talk:Steven Cheetham

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.

Biography Portal

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Cricket Portal

Click here for information about how the WikiProject assesses notability
Steven Cheetham is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project page for more details.

Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale.

Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

Additional information:

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status:

Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked
Categories and templates: not checked

To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call:

|B-Class-1=yes/no

|B-Class-2=yes/no

|B-Class-3=yes/no

|B-Class-4=yes/no

|B-Class-5=yes/no

|B-Class-6=yes/no

[edit] Not really worth an entry

I cannot see that this cricketer is worth an entryJimBakken (talk) 12:43, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Jim, according to the notability criteria, Cheetham is, as a first-class cricketer, notable. —Moondyne 15:41, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Steven Cheetham

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Not really worth an entry

Views

Navigation

Interaction

Search