Talk:Steve Camp
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 04:37, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
I have removed the sentence that said that Camp's blog attacked Kirk Cameron and Ray Comfort. Although his blog criticises one event in which they were involved, his blog also affirmed his respect for Cameron and Comfort and his agreement with the theology behind their ministry. That is hardly an attack--rather, just a minor criticism. Pftaylor (talk) 14:44, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
What constitutes a "serious musician"? And why no mention of his wife divorcing him, which in the eyes of some of his Christian music fans damaged his credibility? (frankenc) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.238.143.40 (talk) 18:29, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
I would not remove the sentence about his attacks, since that is one of the few items that speaks to his character. The rest of this article is far from neutral, reading more like a speaker/musician promo. The first part of the "career" section needs some serious re-writing. I'm not sure what it's trying to say - that Steve Camp was able to bypass all normal paths to linguistic and theological training? All-in-all this strikes me as a promotional piece. Or self-promotional. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wasrts (talk • contribs) 00:54, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
I'd agree with frankenc that the phrase "serious musician" probably violates NPOV. I'd say simply removing "serious" is sufficient. If we want to make a statement regarding the artistic quality of his music, that is better done through quotations in album reviews, mentions of awards received and the like. GBrady (talk) 19:28, 6 June 2008 (UTC)