Talk:Steve Aylett
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The page I've linked to as a reference to "Jeff Lint" appears to be a Wikipedia page -- I suspect it's the deleted Jeff Lint page. The discussion for that page says it was deleted because the entry does not point out that he's a fictional character; as the page I've linked to is hosted at the publisher, presumably the deleted WP entry was written by them. (I have no connection at all to the publisher, author or anyone else, I just like the book :) )
I can see that this might cause confusion between legitimate Wp pages and ones faked up as promotional material. On the other hand the page is an excellent overview of the fictional character's career. I will therefore add a disclaimer to the link text pointing out this out. Is this OK? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imipak (talk • contribs) 11:08, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 'Trickster'
Having only read Lint am not claiming any expertise, but is the assertion that Aylett's characters often correspond to the trickster archetype illuminating enough to be featured so early in his entry? I would have though it would be necessary to demonstrate some interest in Jung, or other users of this terminology, for it to be of much use to the reader. Otherwise, it looks a bit like new research... Millichip 13:01, 1 November 2007 (UTC)