Talk:Steppe-tundra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Merge

Neither steppe nor tundra, would be highly inaccurate to merge with either one. Guettarda 19:07, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

I just looked at the article called steppe-tundra, it is misleading and should NOT be merged with Steppe. Steppe is is used for thing and Tundra for another. There is an article on Tundra and an article on Steppe, those articles should link to each other.

--Son_of_the_Tundra 12:19, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

I believe the "Steppe-tundra" notion comes from paleogeography; there's no such biome at present but there has been such paleoenvironment until some-ten thousands years ago. If anywhere - it belongs here in a separate article, to my opinion - Introvert ^talk 17:34, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

Exactly. Guettarda 21:23, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

I Agree 100%, an extinct Biome should not be merged with a near similar one that exists today. It should equally be merged with Tundra, if you are going to merge it.Youstolemyturtle (talk) 11:54, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AFD

This article was nominated for deletion. The result was no consensus. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steppe-tundra · Katefan0^(scribble) 19:08, 14 September 2005 (UTC)