Talk:Stepin Fetchit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stepin Fetchit article.
Article policies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Contents

Might want to cut out that part about his movies being "rarely screened", as Bend of the River is on basic cable on an almost bi-weekly basis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.188.57.53 (talk • contribs) 06:16, 5 December 2004

[edit] Requested change in text

Fetchit → Perry – In some places in the text, the man is no longer "Fetchit". We now recognize that the term is overtly degrading to a man and to a entire people. Certainly, that the biography mentions his conversion to Islam indicates that it was a profound spiritual conversion. Obviously, he personally left that part of his life behind him after some point. Please allow the text to reflect that highly likely fact.

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
  • Support. Amorrow 02:26, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose this attempt by Amorrow to rewrite the policies of Wikipedia to suit their own politics. This originated at Linda Lovelace where Amorrow decided without consultation to move the article to Linda Susan Boreman, and when no one except Amorrow supported keeping the article at that location, made references to the mothers of other editors performing fellatio[1] and made threats that these editors would find their own names on Wikipedia changed[2]. After not a single person supported Amorrow's move, they started another poll suggesting that in the text the stage name Linda Lovelace should be replaced by Linda "Lovelace", claiming in the preface of the poll that "If it were a matter of, for instance, race, rather than gender, there would be no question." This article, Stepin Fetchit was raised to demonstrate that the claim was false: when the image associated with the stage name was considered racially degrading in the POVs of many, not one person suggested that that POV would, with "no question", override the Wikipedia practice of locating the person's article under the name by which they are best known. Rather than concede that their claim was incorrect, Amorrow has now included this page in their campaign to see political POVs be considered more important than simple considerations of what name is most likely to be searched for and linked to. -- Antaeus Feldspar 04:55, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Strongly Oppose. There is no reason why this article should be moved to a name under which no one is likely to search. By all means place a redirect at Perry. Amorrow's attitude is revealed in the comment below. Unbelievable. Quill 23:19, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
Uh, I did not ask to rename the page. I just wanna change two places near the end of the text from Fetchit to Perry. You got this guy as a slave, and you are never gonna let go of him, are you. Amorrow 23:23, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Oh, come off it.

Come on. I am just trying to show some sweet ol' dead n*gg*r just a shred of respect. Why will you not let me do that? He was a nice man when he was alive. Where does it say in the policy, that once you have the dirt on someone, that you have to use it to pulverize them or their legacy into tinier and tinier worthless pieces? Amorrow 08:13, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

I wonder whether you are cognizant of the fact that you are trying to treat dead people with "respect" by denying them equality. Your arguments constantly revolve around the assumption that the choice between Lincoln Perry and Stepin Fetchit is a "matter of race" and the choice between Linda Boreman and Linda Lovelace is a "matter of gender". Why are you convinced that you are some shining light to the nations, showing them the way to justice and equality -- through discrimination on the basis of race and gender?
The principle that Wikipedia uses is blind to race. It is blind to gender. It is blind to orientation. It is blind to whether the image associated with a name is considered the paragon of humanity, or the watchword of degradation. It is blind to whether that image will change with time as images so often do. It is blind to everything except "is this the name by which this person is best known?"
Do you really think your efforts to protect, quote, "some sweet ol' dead n*gg*r" are a sign of your enlightenment, when they are founded on the idea that, even after death, his very race makes him need your patriarchal protection? You seem to think that you were only being ironic when you referred to Mr. Perry as if he were some mascot for whom you felt a condescending affection. I'd suggest that this is closer to the reality of your attitude than you are capable of seeing or admitting; you are still treating people as second-class citizens based on race and gender, and the fact that it's 'second-class citizens who couldn't possibly be expected to live by the same rules as white males' is not a great step up from 'second-class citizens who couldn't possibly be expected to exercise the same rights as white males'. -- Antaeus Feldspar 23:50, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
Look at that last line:
Stepin Fetchit converted to Islam in the 1960s.

I cannot think of any normal, thinking person who would be proud to have written that line. It is so out-of-touch with reality. It might show up in, maybe, the National Enquirer. Tell me: what it your problem with

Perry converted to Islam in the 1960s.

Is it like, you cannot keep track of all the different people on that page or something because it is just so confusing? OK, OK. It is wrong of me to be so sarcastic, but look at what we are talking about here. I realize that the guy dead and this does not mean squat to him or his descendents. Let us try this: Shirley Temple. Why does she get:

Mrs. Black received honorary doctorates...

Should that not be simply this?

Temple received honorary doctorates...

or maybe even

Shirley received honorary doctorates...

or maybe even

Shirley Temple received honorary doctorates...

Go change that, why don't you? I dare you to. Amorrow 01:31, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

"OK, OK. It is wrong of me to be so sarcastic ..." ... What, you only just started realizing there was anything inappropriate about your behavior? -- Antaeus Feldspar 03:48, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
Uh, what I did to some unexpecting grade school teachers might be consider "behavior". It was labeled as "Conduct" on my report card. You have only experienced me as I sit and type. You want to accuse me of a thought crime? Guilty as charged! I am sure there are those who, upon recognizing that we share the same air on this planet, find it offensive that I breathe at all. Too bad for them! They simply have not yet tried hard enough to find out what it is about me that they might find to be genuinely enjoyable. I noticed that you managed restrain yourself from applying the template of childhood stardom to Mrs. Black. Surely, everybody knows her for that more than anything else she has done. I am sure that she appreciates your restraint and good judgement on that matter.
Consider adding pov tag::

This is a nice article, but it clearly has a pro-Perry bias (e.g. 2nd sentence of intro, also "Perry was an actor in the truest sense of the word," etc.). It reads more like a retrospective on Perry's career than it does an encyclopedia article. Although it does present both sides of the argument, numerous times it asserts that one side (the pro-Perry side) is correct. Probably should get the pov tag or a re-write. --66.67.213.241 15:05, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Selected filmography

As per Wikipedia is not a collection of lists, I have again reverted the edits by anonymous vandal 24.15.217.4 (talk · contribs) (who never adds a summary to their edits), reduced the Filmography section to just the films that have Wiki articles, and renamed it to "Selected filmography" ... people can click the IMDb External link at the end of the article to see his full filmography with links to information about each of the films.

I have also used [[19xx in film|19xx]] tags for the years of the films, something that 24.15.217.4 does not appear to understand, since they seem to think that just linking [[19xx]] somehow has some encyclopedic value ... they have removed or reverted the "year in film" links in other articles as well.

Anonymous edits without comments may be revereted by anyone. --72.75.72.174 (talk · contribs) 15:16, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Stepin fetchit.jpg

Image:Stepin fetchit.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)