Talk:Steffan O'Sullivan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] Merger Discussion

This article should be merged with FUDGE as the subject fails notability guideline WP:BIO. --Gavin Collins 09:31, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

From WP:BIO:

*Creative professionals: scientists, academics, economists, professors, authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, engineers, and other creative professionals.

He is an established author, so let's proceed from there.

• • The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique.
  • The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, which has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.

Check out Fudge (role-playing game). Specifically, Fudge (role-playing game)#Printed Supplements for the Fudge System. I believe this discounts your notability argument. Turlo Lomon 12:37, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

I also want to add that Bunnies and Burrows is also notable, as proven in that article. This supports the second clause I copied above. Turlo Lomon 15:35, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

• As you know, notability is not inherited. This article is too short to demonstrate notability. If the concept, theory or technique was notable, its should follow that there would be a large body of work supporting the claim to notability. I see no evidence of this, although it is always possible that I am mistaken. However, I still propose merger. --Gavin Collins 09:34, 24 September 2007 (UTC)