Talk:Steel Dragon 2000

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject Roller Coasters, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Roller coasters. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale.
High	This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale.

Anything over 300 feet is "officially" a gigacoaster according to whom? It is an arbitrary designation. Morgan could call it a kiddie coaster and it still wouldn't mean anything.

[edit] About Criticism

Is this really needed? Very few people that have actually ridden the coaster in the Enthusiast Community have complained or even attempted to compare it to MF. Sounds like Cedar Point bias almost, the way it was written.

I agree, this is too biased. Calling the turnaround on Steel Dragon 2000 a simple helix is quite an understatement, and the support for another company (Intamin) certainly violates NPOV.

dj_ansi 07:06, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] This article is sadly neglected

This is the longest coaster in the world, and the tallest gigacoaster in the world (beating Millennium Force, and yet the article is tiny. I think the assessment is off too: I'd rate its class as Stub, and its importance as High. Comments? --Skylights76 (talk) 22:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

After taking another look at this, it's obvious that my first impression was correct, so I went ahead and changed the assessment to stub/high. --Skylights76 (talk) 04:14, 18 March 2008 (UTC)