Talk:Stealth-adapted virus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Viruses WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve and organize articles about biological viruses on Wikipedia. Please work to improve this article, or visit our project page to find other ways of helping. Thanks! | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
|||
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject on Alternative Medicine. Please visit the project page for more details, or ask questions on talk. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. |
Thrilling. Wikipedia has a stealth-adapted virus. JFW | T@lk 09:19, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] See also
I deleted the see also links to list of autism topics and vaccine controversy, as e.g. the autism issue is already referenced in the text. Andrew73 04:11, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] confirmation?
Has any other lab ever confirmed results reported in a publication by Martin? --JWSchmidt 21:05, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dubious
It seems like the current version of this article is just regurgitating Martin's theory, which seems to be backed by no research. Is the theory even notable? It seems like the article should at least be re-worded to make it clear what are the claims of Martin, and what are actual documented facts. Statements like "Stealth-adapted viruses have been recovered from the blood" are not facts, but are highly dubious claims made by Martin. Herd of Swine 15:53, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dr Martin Stripped of Licence?
According to the national CFIDS foundation [1] Martin was stripped of his licence to perform laboratory tests years ago, but continues to offer testing for the stealth virus on his website. There does not appear to be any acceptance of his theories by the scientific community. This article is greatly biased towards the assumption that his theories are proven and accepted, and that his treatment is effective. In fact, it appears to be illegal. --Moonflake 10:10, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
