User talk:Starstylers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Starstylers, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!


Contents

[edit] HB I

You will need to read carefully about language used in this article - this is an online encylopedia - some terminology used is not appropriate - a good read of WP:MOS would be well worth it - as well as the issue of citations - some assertions you make need citations otherwise someone will revert them as of dubious claims SatuSuro 14:50, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Prabowo Subianto

Yes, a lot of work needs to be done on that article. Very WP:POV language and no references. It might even be better to start again, using only strictly referenced material. --Merbabu 03:59, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sayogo Hendro Subroto

undefined A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Sayogo Hendro Subroto, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Davidelit 05:41, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Please dont react like you did its consider uncivil also we discuss the article not the person. In your response you mention associations with these people that could be percieved as conflict of interest. These are some of the etiquette policies theres also dont bite the newbies.
I going to remove the Prod notice but in doing so I will suggest that the article goes through [{WP:AFD]]. AFD is a forumn where article get discussed to help establish that the subject meets wikipedia's requirements during this time it recommend that you edit the article addressing any concerns that get raised. If at the end of the AfD the consensus is to delete then thats what will happen. Anyway if I can be of help please just drop a note on my talk page. Gnangarra 12:56, 8 October 2007 (UTC)



[edit] Mbak Tutut

Please don't remove "fact" tags without providing the reference. It won't be tolerated. Thanks. --Merbabu (talk) 12:12, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] "Indonesian Revolution of 1998"

I am happy to raise this issue of the article name with Indonesia editors - I agree, perhaps the name could be improved. Please wait and contribute to the discussions.

In the meantime, will you please improve your act by ensuring you write in a WP:NPOV tone, use reliable references for absolutely everything you add (fugly bali is not a reliable source - it makes wikipedia look stupid), and stop using unprofessional language (ie, "moral masturbation") on talk pages. thanks and kind regards. --Merbabu (talk) 12:31, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Please

Could you learn to sign - the four thingies up on the left hand side of your keyboard - it would be appreciated - thanks SatuSuro 13:05, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Starstylers. We need to sign out posts on user talk pages and on article talk pages, but, NOT on articles. To sign, all you need to do is to type four tildes " ~ " (ie, ~~~~) and when you click “save page” it will automatically convert to a time and date stamp with your user name. Alternatively, just press the sig button Image:Signature_icon.png above the edit box and this will give you the same result. If you want detailed info see WP:SIG. --Merbabu (talk) 22:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

PS, you don't need to sign edit summaries. Just talk pages like this one. --Merbabu (talk) 00:26, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

My apologies about not clarifying for talk items only - theres no big deal about it but after a while on talk pages - automated bots will perpetually follow you like a bad smell thats all :( SatuSuro 23:12, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Nafas enak - its ok now - :) SatuSuro 10:45, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Karanganyar Regency

Please don't reintroduce incorrect wikipedia formatting 1 day after it's already been removed. here Please reinstate the heading and section formatting per this change. It's really annoying seeing the same formatting errors and bad English re-entered only a day after it was cleaned up. --Merbabu (talk) 11:56, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Um

I hate to be so pedantic but the astana giribangun was looking like dogs breakfast

References never are located below category labels


  • & Please note order and location now:-
  • References
  • Further reading
  • External links
  • Category/stub indicator

Please help by keeping articles laid out correctly, thanks SatuSuro 23:06, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pak H...

The article is just too long and detailed. I will be working to reduce other sections further (the 'Health Crises' and 'purges' sections are good examples). That 'death' section was difficult to read with many details. Yes, possibly a separate article could be made. I'd suggest more info would be needed - could be quite nice. You put together some good info and references - why not use that as your start and add to it. I can review. The info i removed is still in the history. --Merbabu (talk) 14:40, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

++me++

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view#Neutrality_and_verifiability

[edit] Advertisements

Please do not tag the Featured Article of the Day as an advertisement. It is not an advertisement. It is a featured article about a business. There is a difference. DS (talk) 05:07, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tildes

Please do not use tildes (~~~~) in your edit summary. Tildes are only meant for talk pages, like what you're looking at right now. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters(Broken clamshellsOtter chirps) 05:16, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Elderly Instruments

Please quit saying that it "reeks of advertising". The article is written entirely from a neutral point of view and is very well sourced -- so well sourced in fact that it's today's featured article. There is no way that a featured article could be shot down as "advertising". Ten Pound Hammer and his otters(Broken clamshellsOtter chirps) 16:44, 21 May 2008 (UTC)