From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Carol Stapek. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. User:Zoe|(talk) 01:18, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Please do not make personal attacks on other people as you did at Admin Zoe. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Flakeloaf 01:23, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
I like you just fine, now that you are indefinitely blocked for creating Admin Zoe. How do you like me now? User:Zoe|(talk) 01:24, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.
personal attacks
You have not been autoblocked. However, you have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock|your_reason_here}} to your talk page. -- -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 23:26, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "The people who got me blocked were given no chance to act on the personal attack warning. After receiving the warning at 1:23, they were banned less than a minute later. For this reason and the ones I previously posted, I should be unblocked."
Decline reason: "Unfortunately, I don't buy your story -- your account was created, made a grand total of about 6 edits, by the looks of things, and then got blocked for disruption, all on the same day. If the account was compromised, it appears to have been breached from its very creation. Unless you had a more compelling explanation? -- Luna Santin 10:42, 15 January 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
((unblock|The people who got me blocked were given no chance to act on the personal attack warning. After receiving the warning at 1:23, they were banned less than a minute later. For this reason and the ones I previously posted, I should be unblocked.))
- To clarify, my posting the warning and Zoe's decision to block you were not related; administrators (which I am not) are free to block users without warning for behaviour which violates Wikipedia policy. If I can offer a suggestion, your best bet right now is to take this up with User talk:Zoe and try to talk your way out from underneath the block. Flakeloaf 10:09, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
