Talk:Star formation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Star Formation & Star formation
Star formation and Star Formation currently point to different articles. They should be merged or disambiguated in some way. -- BenRG 09:40, 7 Oct 2003 (UTC)
Ok. Now both point here. --AstroNomer 23:32, Oct 7, 2003 (UTC)
[edit] References to star formations
Hi all.
Could anyone add information about known current star formations? Also is there any current theory on the expected frequency of observable star formations?
-Sjalq
um....... just about every single nebula ever observed Ezkerraldean
- Have a look at the star cluster page, as well as galaxy. — RJH (talk) 14:53, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Additions
Wouldn't some coverage of the following information be appropriate for this page?
- Jeans Instability
- Bok globule
- Protoplanetary disk
- T Tauri star
- Herbig Ae/Be stars
- Herbig-Haro object
- Hayashi track
- Henyey track
- Brown dwarf
and the formation of binary star systems? Thanks. — RJH (talk) 14:52, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Star Formation Nav Box
This partially relates to RJH's comment above. Wikipedia has a range of articles on different aspects of the star formation process with many of them containing excellent material. However, I found from browsing that a lot of that material doesn't seem to be in the right place and that much of it describes the broader picture of star formation rather than the specific sub-object or process mentioned in the article title. It is my opinion that star formation articles need more of a general framework. To that end I've created a nav box for this astronomy subsection to try and give some sense to these articles as whole. I don't claim its perfect, but some sort of unify construct would help focus the topic. --Jason Kirk 15:11, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 10:04, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Removed irrelevant information from pathfinder objects
I have removed 2 dot points from the pathfinder objects as they are clearly not pathfinder objects. One point was a statement which did not have a appropriate reference and the other was an unreferenced irrelevant quote. Coffeeassured (talk) 13:45, 12 April 2008 (UTC)