Talk:Star Wars Technical Commentaries
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Addressed lack of NPOV and tightened up the language. Last paragraph and ICS aside were unnecessary for an article dealing with SWTC. Please correct any errors. --Rev Prez 06:07, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
- I'd have to admit you fused the first two paragraphs pretty well. However, I think the third paragraph is also important and its contents may be condensed, but not deleted. Because I don't have time to fix it all just yet, I'd just pull the old paragraph out. Maybe you can try to fuse it. Later, I hope to dramatically expand the page. As it is, the thing is at stub length. If we are going to have an article at all, let's have one that's full-sized.
-
- If we can substantiate the third paragraph and cite, then I'm all for keeping it. Also, should we consider collapsing SWTC into a larger Star Wars "fanon" article (or something else that exists)? I'm going to propose doing the same for SD.net. --Rev Prez 06:31, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-
-
- I'd find more specific examples later, but I just linked a thread that shows some of Saxton's enemies at TFN, and a second showing some of Paul Hidalgo's antics. When I expand the third paragraph into another "Criticisms" section in the AOTC vein, I'd try and find specific TFN threads involving each point. --Kazuaki Shimazaki 15:46, 1 June 2005 (UTC)
-