Talk:Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace article.

Article policies
Archives: 1, 2
Former featured article Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good article Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace has been listed as one of the Arts good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
Featured topic star Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace is part of the "Star Wars episodes" series (project page), a featured topic identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do.
Main Page trophy This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 1, 2007.
WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia The spoken word version of this article is part of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, an attempt to produce recordings of Wikipedia articles. To participate, visit the project page.
To-do list for Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace:
  • add more references to the plot section
  • add more references to the article, clear citation needed tags
  • copyedit, especially introduction
  • re-nominate for Featured Article status!


[edit] Cleanup

I've done some cleanup to the citation templates, and in the process saw some issues. First, there is no consistency in the use of templates. Styling should be consistent in the entire article. That means, if you got it from a DVD then use the Cite Video template, and remove any sections that are not applicable. I just removed 2kb of information that wasn't being used. I saw in the FAR that there was concern over the use of IMDb. I agree, it is abundantly in this article, and many times you can see where they were quoting another source. If they got it from another news organization then go find it in that organization's archives. The article probably needs a thorough copyedit as well.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 20:29, 13 April 2008 (UTC)