From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Stanley L. Klos is part of WikiProject Ohio, which collaborates on Ohio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to current discussions. |
??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
|
Suggested article edit guidelines:
- To help us prioritise our workload, and in readiness for Wikipedia:1.0, we need to assess our articles for Quality. If this article is Unassessed, please assess it. See the Article Classification for instructions. If you disagree with a rating, you can change it or discuss it at Article Classification.
- After assessing this article's quality, please make sure it to add it to the Lists at Article Classification, following the grading scheme detailed there.
|
This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard. |
[edit] Autobiography?
Is this article an autobiography?--BillFlis 13:52, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- No, but it is over the top. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.77.10.31 (talk) 02:23, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
-
- Actually, I think it really is! Almost all of the edits are by two users, Damslerset and Cedarkey1, whose edits in other articles all seem to be adding links to websites run by this guy (virtualology.com, famousamericans.net, and his book). Also, if you look at the actual text of this page (edit it), it uses weird formatting, like it was pulled directly from a MS-Word document or another webpage or something; it's not usual wikipedia format. Funny!--BillFlis (talk) 06:52, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- It has that appearance - consider also the tie-in links on other pages, which have become a nuisance. Tedickey (talk) 12:03, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
-
- Nuisance? Do you mean all the articles that link to here? There must be a couple hundred. Somebody's been very busy indeed! Does that bother you? I don't see why. In fact, I think it's a hoot. You go, guy! Glory, glory, hallelujah ...--BillFlis (talk) 01:33, 28 November 2007 (UTC)