Talk:Stanley Kubrick/to do

Establish SK’s cultural significance.
- Provide evidence that the films are ”considered classics of 20th century cinema”, i.e. cite polls by Sight & Sound and other respected film magazines, etc.
Streamline and improve the prose.
- I suggest we start at the top, and work downwards following SK’s life chronologically.
- Any new biographical morsels should be added to ”Trivia” (a temporary storehouse) instead of prying a place for them in the main text. If, on the other hand, you have substantial material to add, feel free to edit the content accordingly.
  - Keep anecdotal (happenings on film sets) and interpretive (theories about the films) comments to a minimum: the interested reader can always go to the relevant film page for more information (at least in the future).
Expand ”Tabloid rumors” so that the section discusses all aspects of the ”Kubrick myth”: the origins, propagation and debunking of the rumors, and so on.
Add a few more images: screen captures from the films, poster artwork, etc. Discuss your choices before adding them to the page.
Try to provide citations for the information presented in the article