Talk:Stalingrad (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
???
This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.

[edit] Extended version

Any info on the extended version? Like Das Boot, this film is a condensed version from the TV series. --Pelladon 08:17, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

The North American version has a 150 minute runtime. If the posted plot is of the 132 minute version, there isn't enough detail to spot the differences.--2ltben 15:45, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Objection to the opening paragraph

The statement that Platoon or Apocalypse Now are in any way realistic or even not romantic is nonsense. Apocalypse Now is just "Heart of Darkness" set in the Nam, while Platoon was just overwrought garbage. A better opening paragraph might be, "Stalingrad is bunch of fictionalized crap just like Apocalypse Now, Platoon, and Saving Private Ryan. Like those movies, it purports to be about real events, but is actually a wholly fake reflection of its creators biases and prejudices." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.63.86.153 (talk) 05:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

I agree that the comparison to those films is faulty and should be removed from the intro.139.48.25.61 (talk) 19:47, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Stalingrad film.jpg

Image:Stalingrad film.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:38, 6 June 2007 (UTC)