Stationary spacetime

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In general relativity, a spacetime is said to be stationary if it admits a global, nowhere zero timelike Killing vector field. In a stationary spacetime, the metric tensor components, gμν, may be chosen so that they are all independent of the time coordinate. The line element of a stationary spacetime has the form (i,j = 1,2,3)

ds2 = λ(dt − ωidyi)2 − λ − 1hijdyidyj,

where t is the time coordinate, yi are the three spatial coordinates and hij is the metric tensor of 3-dimensional space. In this coordinate system the Killing vector field ξμ has the components ξμ = (1,0,0,0). λ is a positive scalar representing the norm of the Killing vector, i.e., λ = gμνξμξν, and ωi is a 3-vector, called the twist vector, which vanishes when the Killing vector is hypersurface orthogonal. The latter arises as the spatial components of the twist 4-vector  \omega_{\mu} = e_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}\xi^{\nu}\nabla^{\rho}\xi^{\sigma}(see, for example, [1], p. 163) which is orthogonal to the Killing vector ξμ, i.e., satisfies ωμξμ = 0. The twist vector measures the extent to which the Killing vector fails to be orthogonal to a family of 3-surfaces. A non-zero twist indicates the presence of rotation in the spacetime geometry.

The coordinate representation described above has an interesting geometrical interpretation[2]. The time translation Killing vector generates a one-parameter group of motion G in the spacetime M. By identifying the spacetime points that lie on a particular trajectory (also called orbit) one gets a 3-dimensional space (the manifold of Killing trajectories) V = M / G, the quotient space. Each point of V represents a trajectory in the spacetime M. This identification, called a canonical projection,  \pi : M \rightarrow V is a mapping that sends each trajectory in M onto a point in V and induces a metric h = − λπ * g on V via pullback. The quantities λ, ωi and hij are all fields on V and are consequently independent of time. Thus, the geometry of a stationary spacetime does not change in time. In the special case ωi = 0 the spacetime is said to be static. By definition, every static spacetime is stationary, but the converse is not generally true, as the Kerr metric provides a counterexample.

In a stationary spacetime satisfying the vacuum Einstein equations Rμν = 0 outside the sources, the twist 4-vector ωμ is curl-free,

\nabla_{\mu}\omega_{\nu} - \nabla_{\nu}\omega_{\mu} = 0,

and is therefore locally the gradient of a scalar ω (called the twist scalar):

\omega_{\mu} = \nabla_{\mu}\omega.

Instead of the scalars λ and ω it is more convenient to use the two Hansen potentials, the mass and angular momentum potentials, ΦM and ΦJ, defined as[3]

\Phi_{M} = \frac{1}{4}\lambda^{-1}(\lambda^{2} + \omega^{2} -1),
\Phi_{J} = \frac{1}{2}\lambda^{-1}\omega.

In general relativity the mass potential ΦM plays the role of the Newtonian gravitational potential. A nontrivial angular momentum potential ΦJ arises for rotating sources due to the rotational kinetic energy which, because of mass-energy equivalence, can also act as the source of a gravitational field. The situation is analogous to a static electromagnetic field where one has two sets of potentials, electric and magnetic. In general relativity, rotating sources produce a gravitomagnetic field which has no Newtonian analog.

A stationary vacuum metric is thus expressible in terms of the Hansen potentials ΦA (A = M, J) and the 3-metric hij. In terms of these quantities the Einstein vacuum field equations can be put in the form[3]

(h^{ij}\nabla_{i}\nabla_{j} - 2R^{(3)})\Phi_{A} = 0,
R^{(3)}_{ij} = 2[\nabla_{i}\Phi_{A}\nabla_{j}\Phi_{A} - (1+ 4 \Phi^{2})^{-1}\nabla_{i}\Phi^{2}\nabla_{j}\Phi^{2}],

where \Phi^{2} = \Phi_{A}\Phi_{A} = (\Phi_{M}^{2} + \Phi_{J}^{2}), and R^{(3)}_{ij} is the Ricci tensor of the spatial metric and R^{(3)} = h^{ij}R^{(3)}_{ij} the corresponding Ricci scalar. These equations form the starting point for investigating exact stationary vacuum metrics.

[edit] References

  1. ^ Wald, R.M., (1984). General Relativity, (U. Chicago Press)
  2. ^ Geroch, R., (1971). J. Math. Phys. 12, 918
  3. ^ a b Hansen, R.O. (1974). J. Math. Phys. 15, 46.