Standards Board for England

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Standards Board for England, established following the Local Government Act 2000, is responsible for promoting high ethical standards in local democracy. It oversees the Code of Conduct, which covers members and co-opted members who serve on a range of authorities. The Standards Board maintains an overview of investigations in to allegations that members' conduct may have fallen short of the required standards as well as ensuring a robust and proportionate framework is in place in which the public can have confidence.

Those who are subject to such supervision are the following types of authority in England and the members of any of them:


Contents

[edit] Responsibility for Ethical Standards

Primary responsibility for ensuring ethical standards rests with the Councils themselves. Each local authority which is subject to the Code of Conduct must appoint a monitoring officer or local standards committee. The chief executive and legal officers of a council have a duty to advise members on ethical matters.

Under forthcoming changes, the standards committee of each council (which will have to be chaired by an independent member) will be responsible for receiving allegations and deciding whether any action needs to be taken. Standards committees will report periodically to the Standards Board for England.

[edit] Code of Conduct

The Code of Conduct was revised after an extensive consultation process and the new Code came into force on 3 May 2007. Revisions include the relaxing of the definition of 'personal interest' and extends the rights of councillors to speak in relation to matters in which they have a prejudicial interest. Where councillors have a prejudicial interest in a matter, they are now given the same rights as members of the public to speak at meetings where that matter is discussed.

A councillor is now only deemed to have a personal interest in a matter if it affects them to a greater extent than the majority of their constituents. This allows greater freedom for councillors to represent their constituents fairly and to act as community advocates.

[edit] Statistics of Complaints

According to the Board's 2007 Annual Review and Report[1], of all the complaints received in the year:

  • only 3% were referred fo adjudication, and 4% back to the local authority.
  • 93% were determined as No evidence of breach or No further action (38% and 55% respectively).

Of the No further action determinations:

  • 33% - evidence not decisive
  • 30% - remedy agreed or in place
  • 17% - mitigation or trivial
  • 11% - no longer councillor
  • 6% - whole council problem
  • 3% - public interest defence

Only 37 cases were referred to the Adjudication Panel. Of these:

  • 26% - no breach
  • 26% - no sanction
  • 21% - disqualified for up to a year
  • 11% - disqualified for 15 months to five years
  • 16% - suspended for a year

[edit] Issues

[edit] Predetermination

The issue of predetermination is often confused with the Code of Conduct. The judge-made, common law rules on bias and predetermination have to be taken into account by councillors, but these rules are not part of the Code of Conduct or the responsibility of the Standards Board for England.

[edit] See also

[edit] External links

 This England-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
 This article related to government in the United Kingdom or its constituent countries is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.