User talk:St.daniel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Maggies Farm Vandalsim
I didn't vandalise maggies farm I just corrected it, the lyrics to the placebo song Slave to the wage is BITCH only the radio edit features the word WITCH, listen to it yourself.
[edit] Vandalism?
Daniel, please explain to me why you nixed my contribution and characterized it as vandalism. I checked the page on vandalism and I'm sure that my entry does not fall into any of those categories. I'm new to wikipedia and I don't necessarily know how to do everything properly. For instance, I had a hard time figuring out how to reply to you. I would appreciate any constructive help, but I don't appreciate it if you are some kind of over-zealous, control freak wikinazi. I would like my valid addition to The Secret (film) to remain.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Herbanreleaf (talk • contribs) 20:52, 18 January 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Reply
No problem. It happens to me a lot too. Are you aware that your userpage is basically on my talk page? It's like a link or something.President George W. Bushcarrot 20:11, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
I think I got it off St.daniel
[edit] Ahem.
Hey, I never said Green Day sucked!! Someone else said that, and I edited it out!! Next time, look at the history before mouthing off!! Davi 16:10, 28 November 2006 (UTC) Alright, I just looked at my user page, here's the deal: User:Darktrax577 left a disparaging comment on the Green Day article. I removed it, and left him a warning. He then went to my user page and, without leaving a signature, pretty much repeated his disparaging comment. I have removed it. I am a Green Day fan. And I hope that idiot burns in hell...am I allowed to say that?? Davi 16:16, 28 November 2006 (UTC) It's all good. Davi 18:27, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Vandal Warnings
Hi, can you please use the vandalism warning templates found at WP:VAND. It makes it clearer for the admins and those being warned. ViridaeTalk 13:01, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks!
Thank you for the quick revert of the vandalism to my user page. I do appreciate it. --JFreeman (talk) 01:39, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Be Careful
Thanks for working on the vandalism problem, but be careful! You removed 1/3 of the article on James Monroe and re-inserted a bunch of earlier vandalism, when all you really needed to do was to remove one line! Cheers, Eleuther 23:52, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
Thank you for reverting my user page. First time that's happened; I feel all warm and fuzzy inside now. --Geniac 15:54, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] It's me again.
User:Darktrax577 is continuing to vandalise my personal page, and an anonymous user has started in on it. All because I cleaned up the Green Day article!! This is what I get for being a fan...anywho, any advice on how to handle this?? Thanks!! Davi 18:34, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Darktrax577 (talk · contribs)
Heh, alright. Not sure why he/she thought we wouldn't notice, but okie doke. Blocked for 31 hours. And thanks for the revert. ;) Luna Santin 21:50, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- The account is currently blocked indefinitely; the IP should be free to edit, unless there's an autoblock in place (those I can't control). Judging from the fact that the {{unblock-auto}} request was placed by the account (as opposed to someone else), and from a quick glance at Special:Contributions/209.66.192.143, I don't think we're missing much, either way. Luna Santin 23:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Tuskar Rock
I have replied to your WP:CSD request on the Talk:Tuskar Rock. I'd appreciate your removing the request. Frelke 23:55, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
Thank you very much for your kind message at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:82.45.248.177 . The trouble is that I have sort of been there, done that a bit - I have thousands of edits under an old username - and although I do love Wikipedia in many ways, I am also pretty clear about the fact that it would really be better for me to spend less time here, rather than more. That is, it's pretty much like an addiction and actually I don't think it really does me much good in the long term - I think I already spend too much time on here, even now, from this IP or from another semi-defunct username I still occasionally use for a small amount of editing. But I do very much appreciate the kind sentiment, and thanks for voicing it. Best wishes, 82.45.248.177 11:46, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Cheers! :) 82.45.248.177 13:58, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- And again re the New Year - you have a good one too. :) 82.45.248.177 17:51, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Magging
Why isn't the article on Magging legitimate?--Jalad.azadi 13:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] magging
this page was created and it was created legitimately. I will not delete tags, and i wish to place teh hangon tag to that article.
[edit] nEW mESSAGES
You have new messages at WP:AIV. — Nearly Headless Nick 13:12, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- He had already been warned at least 5 times and Had recieved a last warning. He had not been blocked since that last warning according to the block log and all the other warnings had been placed after the last warning. Correct me if I'm wrong but at that point don't you just go to WP:AIV? Since he has already recieved enough warning.--St.daniel 13:15, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Look, its good that you are reverting vandalism and reporting vandals to WP:AIV. However, in this very case, you did not warn the user a single time this day. The IP might be shared by other users, how would they know that what they are doing is wrong? We need to assume good faith with the vandals and not retaliate with the their kind of retribution. However, I cannot blame you. We have another administrator who blocked him. Reply here if you want to; or read what the top of my page says. ;) — Nearly Headless Nick 13:19, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Isn't it a legtimite reason to request someone who has recieved many warnings ,not by me but by other people, had gotten a last warning and is still vandalizing. Isn't that a valid reason for blocking or do I still have to leve a warning to his page like all the other editors. Can't I use the other users warnings and the fact that he continues to vandalize as reason to nominate for blocking. Isn't that a valid reason?--St.daniel 13:25, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Imagine, you are one of the persons using the anon IP. Your little brother tries Wikipedia. Its fun vandalising. He makes 6 vandalistic edits, gets the boilerplate templates slapped on his page and eventually gets blocked. You are new to Wikipedia too, you try vandalising and get blocked immediately. You never see the You have new messages message on the top of any page, you are clueless why you were blocked. In case the vandal was blanking pages and replacing them with small pieces of text, you could have put a {{bv}} template (also read WP:SUBST) on his talk page, and monitored his contributions. In case he vandalised again, you report him to WP:AIV. It's as simple as that. The last warning is the last warning before the block, after that its a clean slate, unless the user has a very long history of vandalism, which this user did not have. Also, please reply here, I am watching this page. Warm regards, — Nearly Headless Nick 13:32, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- First off I would like to say that I did not attempt to be overally cruel to this vandal or deal out harsh justice. I was just following procedure. I have been blocked because of vandals on my shared IP even though I was a registered user. It sucked but I realized that it was what needed to be done. Second I didn't know it was a shared IP. That was not at the top of the page at the time I nominated him for deletion. Second he had gotten a last warning already. It if he had been a vadnal it would not be my responsibility that he had been blocked. When you vandalize you have given up at least some of the trust wiki places in you people begin to watch you closely for another page blank or swear word. I believe in good faith but there are limits. And I would like to stress that the reason I did not place {{bv}} or test 4 or any other template on his page was because he had been warned 11 times before and had recieved a last warning. Heck I would have given him a test4 excecpt that I saw that someone had placed it already and so I nominated him for blocking. Obviousally it being a shared IP changes it but I didn't know he was on a shared IP before. That was added after the block. You can't believe that after getting about 11 warnings including one test4 he was not a prime canidate for blocking. You also mention something about trying vandalizing. I have no sympathy for people who try vandalizing. I don't think you should be blocked for it because that would be wayy to harsh but I don't have sympathy for them all the same. As for monitoring his contribs he had already recieved a last warning and was continuing to vandalize that is enough monitoring for me especially when I'm Rc'ing. I'm sorry if it seems rude but I have never had anyone who had a problem with blocking a vandal with 11 warnings and one last warning who was still vandalizing. please reply.--St.daniel 20:53, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- It appears that you seem to have made up your mind over this. Could you kindly take this to WT:VAND? Maybe more people talking will help you and me understanding the situation better. Best regards, — Nearly Headless Nick 12:12, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- First off I would like to say that I did not attempt to be overally cruel to this vandal or deal out harsh justice. I was just following procedure. I have been blocked because of vandals on my shared IP even though I was a registered user. It sucked but I realized that it was what needed to be done. Second I didn't know it was a shared IP. That was not at the top of the page at the time I nominated him for deletion. Second he had gotten a last warning already. It if he had been a vadnal it would not be my responsibility that he had been blocked. When you vandalize you have given up at least some of the trust wiki places in you people begin to watch you closely for another page blank or swear word. I believe in good faith but there are limits. And I would like to stress that the reason I did not place {{bv}} or test 4 or any other template on his page was because he had been warned 11 times before and had recieved a last warning. Heck I would have given him a test4 excecpt that I saw that someone had placed it already and so I nominated him for blocking. Obviousally it being a shared IP changes it but I didn't know he was on a shared IP before. That was added after the block. You can't believe that after getting about 11 warnings including one test4 he was not a prime canidate for blocking. You also mention something about trying vandalizing. I have no sympathy for people who try vandalizing. I don't think you should be blocked for it because that would be wayy to harsh but I don't have sympathy for them all the same. As for monitoring his contribs he had already recieved a last warning and was continuing to vandalize that is enough monitoring for me especially when I'm Rc'ing. I'm sorry if it seems rude but I have never had anyone who had a problem with blocking a vandal with 11 warnings and one last warning who was still vandalizing. please reply.--St.daniel 20:53, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Imagine, you are one of the persons using the anon IP. Your little brother tries Wikipedia. Its fun vandalising. He makes 6 vandalistic edits, gets the boilerplate templates slapped on his page and eventually gets blocked. You are new to Wikipedia too, you try vandalising and get blocked immediately. You never see the You have new messages message on the top of any page, you are clueless why you were blocked. In case the vandal was blanking pages and replacing them with small pieces of text, you could have put a {{bv}} template (also read WP:SUBST) on his talk page, and monitored his contributions. In case he vandalised again, you report him to WP:AIV. It's as simple as that. The last warning is the last warning before the block, after that its a clean slate, unless the user has a very long history of vandalism, which this user did not have. Also, please reply here, I am watching this page. Warm regards, — Nearly Headless Nick 13:32, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Isn't it a legtimite reason to request someone who has recieved many warnings ,not by me but by other people, had gotten a last warning and is still vandalizing. Isn't that a valid reason for blocking or do I still have to leve a warning to his page like all the other editors. Can't I use the other users warnings and the fact that he continues to vandalize as reason to nominate for blocking. Isn't that a valid reason?--St.daniel 13:25, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Look, its good that you are reverting vandalism and reporting vandals to WP:AIV. However, in this very case, you did not warn the user a single time this day. The IP might be shared by other users, how would they know that what they are doing is wrong? We need to assume good faith with the vandals and not retaliate with the their kind of retribution. However, I cannot blame you. We have another administrator who blocked him. Reply here if you want to; or read what the top of my page says. ;) — Nearly Headless Nick 13:19, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for the barnstar
"For saving my homepage in the face of vandals thanks."
[edit] Re: Can I ask a question?
Presuming that the warnings and vandalism have been recent or ongoing, I imagine I would probably place a block in such circumstances -- hard to be too specific without a specific example, of course. You needn't let someone know before reporting them to WP:AIV, but it's usually best if they've gotten (and continued vandalizing, following) {{test3}}, {{test4}}, or {{bv}}, following prior warnings as appropriate. Luna Santin 21:41, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] New message
Hangoverboy867 21:56, 18 January 2007 (UTC) Mr Supes lives lives in North Carolina and is visiting Plano, Texas. Visit 1600 post oak blvd. in Houston if you are intrested in meeting me in person at 3:45 AM central time tonight. Bye.
This was added to my userpage by HangoverBoy867 I removed it from the barnstar and placed it lower on the page
[edit] Too Quick for me
Nice work on your rv's of vandalism - beat me on both the rv and warning the user! Speeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedyyy !Pedro1999a | Talk
[edit] A Small Gesture
 |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| Your work against vandalism is great. Have a barnstar. You deserve it. Pedro1999a | Talk 21:39, 18 January 2007 (UTC) |
[edit] Why I blanked my talk page
I've done it before, and I did it to clean up the space. I'm done with those coversations. Am I not allowed to blank my own talk page?--Dil 22:57, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Well, sorry. I'm just making space for more immportant things. I was done with Yamla or whatevers converastion so I deleted it. No big deal.--Dil 23:05, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Cool new message link
Cool new message link :). It got my attention. Copycat989 10:47, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks!!!
Oh wow, but Nicole Richie deserved every bit of it. Cheers. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.102.186.239 (talk) 02:18, 28 January 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Userpage sprotected
Just FYI, I've sprotected your userpage, since whoever you upset the other day is still at it. If you'd rather I lift it, you need only let me know (userpages are generally protected/unprotected on request). My optimistic interpretation says userpage vandalism is frequently a sign of someone who gets in the way of those who would disrupt the project -- with that in mind, keep up the good work! Luna Santin 07:39, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Userbox
Hello St.daniel. I saw your idea on the Userbox ideas page and your note. I love Userboxes and thought I could rework it. Anyway is this any better:
User:Yuanchosaan/Userbox/User Mcain.
Hope you enjoy it. Happy editing! Yuanchosaan 09:47, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] a new message
x + 2 − 43x = 9x * 9x bet you cant solve that in 3.926546546582547512358 seconds —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.19.91.99 (talk) 19:31, 29 January 2007 (UTC).
[edit] What happened?
Hey, thanks for the heads up on my accidental vandalism to Jonas Brothers. Do you have any idea how that happened? I just did a revert, and I don't know anyone named Angela.nut-meg 02:28, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Just a question
Without looking into it in detail, I would believe that I deleted a page with spam, hence it does not show up on the contribution logs. You can check the deletion log for the period when I added the message if oyu are interested in it. -- Chris 73 | Talk 07:37, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reverting my edit
Why did you do it. I thought I was making it more orderly and answering some people's questions on where to sign. You know, being a Frend2All 22:12, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- Actually I didn't mind too much, I wish Frend would have asked. Unless if our Frend missed one I'm fine with it. —¡Randfan!Sign here? 22:21, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
Thanks! Thanks for cleaning up the vandalism to my user page. It was actually me blanking my draft page, but I forgot to log in. Sorry for confusion... and thanks for your vigilance. Christina Kaye 16:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Heyyyyy
Hey it's your buddy from the Super Bowl party! I won't mention any names because everyone can read this, but you already know who I am. Do you use email at all? Contact You-Know-Who (No, not Voldemort) if you want my email. Wow, I'm still freaking out about that whole "MC" thing. I honestly had no idea, but I'm going to tell... our friend... everything next time I talk to her. Anyway, I'm all for stopping vandalism on Wikipedia, just point me in the right direction! I have no clue where to start, but I'll pick it up quickly. See ya.
Mattfromspire 23:37, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] re:edits
I created a new entry with a proper "and" instead of an ampersand "&" I suppose a merge was a better option. Thanks for your quick sights. Cheers, eB —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Englishbloke27 (talk • contribs) 01:52, 6 February 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Toby Keith
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toby_Keith
"In 2007, Toby Keith will be filming a hit Comedy movie with physically disabled comedian Josh Blue in Country's Courtesy Kids. It will begin filming late 2007. Toby Keith has been very excited about this project. Josh Blue caught up with Keith to discuss the film at Toby Keith's Toby Keith's I Love This Bar & Grill in Bricktown, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma." Please remove. It's fake
Joe —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.14.14.26 (talk) 19:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC).
[edit] WikiProject Rock music invitation
Hello WikiProject Alternative music member.
WikiProject Alternative music, in my eyes, has proved to be successful "improving the encyclopaedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock", and improving their quality as well. One specific example I have witnessed is The Smashing Pumpkins article. The page has gone from a mediocre work, to GA status, to FA nomination. Only appropriate, as the Pumpkins are undeniably one of the most influential alternative rock bands on the 1990's and beyond.
This is the stuff I wish to achieve with the somewhat recently ressurected WikiProject Rock music. I hope to also attract attention to rock music articles of all sorts, and hopefully change some to GA or FA status. I invite you to come join us, and not only be a member of alternative Wikipedians, but the rockin' ones as well.
Rock on.
-- Reaper X 03:07, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Editor review
I reviewed you. YechielMan 16:57, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sorry
I'm the person who sometimes edits MegaStructures. You just sent me a warning that I might be blocked off. Well, I'll tell you about why I edit it. Usually, I find new info and add it onto the page. And sometimes, I find out that some episodes have alternate titles so I put those in as well. I didn't know I was vandalising. Sorry about that. Can you explain to me how I'm vandalising the MegaStructures page?
A message from 202.95.200.3.
OK. I won't remove warnings next time.
A message from 202.95.200.3.--202.95.200.3 13:36, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
I wouldn't want you lonely. Thanks for the revert. Prodego talk 00:09, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Whoever that is has been, take a look at my userpage history. It is not a real problem for me though. Prodego talk 00:12, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Muhammad images
I just received your message as to why I deleted the picture of the prophet.
First off, before I go any further I would just like to clarify that it was my brother who deleted the picture(s). He is a very devoted Muslim and he goes on Wikipedia daily to read any article pertaining to Islam. He's not here right now to defend his actions, so I will.
The subject of depiction of any life form is debatable among many Muslims, but one topic that is certainly not debatable is the fact that the prophet Muhammad should under no circumstances be depicted in picture. Yes, I understand that depictions do exist and the pictures were posted on Wikipedia for newcomers, possibly to better understand the religion. However, these pictures defeat the purpose of allowing one to understand the religion.
I doubt anyone can forget the controversy surrounding the Danish cartoon. While most of it relied on the fact that the prophet was compared to a terrorist, there was the fact that it was still a depiction.
Finally, the deletion of the pictures was not an intended act of vandalism. It was simply done out of devotion and the hope of better education. It was not done to insult anybody or ruffle any feathers.
I hope that clarifies.
- Sally Hassanks 05:14, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Alternative music and sources
As part of the Alternative music WikiProject, we're gathering a list of sources on this page. Could you take a look and perhaps add any written references you have access to? Thanks! CloudNine 09:57, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] On the moral dimensions of kicking people while they're down
[Imported from my discussion page.]
I understand your anger but please don't beat the people while they are blocked --St.daniel 17:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- It was less of a beating and more of a jovial poking with a sharp stick. Beatings actually cause injury, while goadings can often be funny and even productive. There's no better way to encourage a healthy disdain for vandals amongst the other students at that school, who will find themselves pre-emptively blocked ("What the hell is wrong with Wikipedia?! Teacher!") for the rest of the school year, than pointing out the common inability of many vandalizers to spell even simple curse words.
- Well ... of course there are "better" ways, but few so likely to evoke a didactic chuckle. To show I'm not a completely heartless comedian, I've added the shared-school-IP template to the talk and user pages for that IP address. --Dynaflow 20:59, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre
The article will be added to in the coming days to make it more encyclopedic, a few of the pages I marked for research have gone offline so I have to find new ones. It will be expanded. Vidioman 12:21, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] re: Alfonsina Molinari
Hi There, the link you added to the article seems to be a dead end. I went to Allexperts.com and tried the name in their search and it came up 'no results found.' Is there an alternate spelling? --killing sparrows 16:09, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- It seems as though the page was removed which is strange as it was up there yesterday.--St.daniel talk 12:11, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Addition
No problemo. Good on ya dude. Rock on. -- Reaper X 05:11, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WP:ROCK
Hey...i'm only new, so i dunno wat to do, and I'm kinda scared of breaking something. So yeah...let me do some reading and I'll get back to you. THANKS FOR YOUR HELP....you're one of the nicer ones here....--Missy C and The Moozik Choosers 06:10, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Alternative music WikiProject newsletter
 Issue 1 - April 2007 |
|
|
Swidden, CattleGirl, UncleMontezuma, Dark Devil, RedHotRageSlave, Kudasai, Sjones23, Triviumchick1990 and Mr Richardson joined the alternative music ranks during April.
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
|
Delivered by CloudNine 14:15, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Things are not as they appear:
The user vandalised the block review. I've since reverted it. She never said that. HalfShadow 23:56, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- His entire page is almost entirely vandalism by him. She just didn't revert back enough. HalfShadow 00:00, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] No problem
Anytime! Natalie 21:46, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD's
Hello, when nominating articles for deletion, please remember when transcluding the discussion on to the main AfD page, remember to add them to the bottom so the oldest are on top and newest are at the bottom. Thank you and happy editing! The Sunshine Man 16:43, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
-
- Thanks for the quick reply, I'd been on the AfD page a little while earlier and had not seen them there and they had appeared on the top so I checked the times to make sure I didnt get mixed up. Happy editing! The Sunshine Man 11:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hola!!
Hey thanks for the help...fantastic. I'm so sorry I haven't got around to it, i've been busy out of my brain....
This probably sounds like dumb question....but how do I get one of those cool little "i enjoy rock music" things? also...have had name change...too much c*r*a*p on the other name. I'm known as Esmerelda Querida now... --Missy C and The Moozik Choosers 05:50, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
HOLA! YOU HAVE FOUND ME ON MY NEW NAME! --Esmerelda Querida 05:53, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Userbox deleted
One of your userboxes on your userpage, User:Yuanchosaan/Userbox/User Mcain was deleted for attack, please remove it from your userpage, thanks! WooyiTalk to me? 22:34, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- Please look at this and this. Thank you. YuanchosaanSalutations! 09:02, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Sorry for my misunderstanding of your userbox that I thought it was expressing hatred to Senator McCain (who, ironically, is one of the only good Republicans). Regards. WooyiTalk to me? 21:55, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- What, he sold out on torture? Himself was tortured during the Vietnam War. WooyiTalk to me? 01:18, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 209.42.61.114
This user vandalized Belen Jesuit again. Callelinea 21:29, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] My RfA
[edit] My Rfa
Hello, Daniel. Thank you so much for your kind support on my recent Rfa, it succeeded! Feel free to yell at me if you ever see me mess up. Oh, and please don't feel lonely, dear, pop by my page anytime you wish, I would love to talk to you. Have a wonderful day! Yours, PeaceNT 07:20, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Newbie's love help
Hola! Thanks for your help with the user boxes...it is nice to deal with some one friendly and willing to help when you're a newbie. Thanks again...you deserve some kind of award! Adios. --Esmerelda Querida 01:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Alternative music WikiProject newsletter
|
Issue 2 - May 2007 |
|
|
Burnedthru, TommyStardust, Grovermj, KamrynMatika, Merzbow and Cbing01 all joined the alternative music fold during May.
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
|
Delivered by CloudNine 11:21, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] My RFA
 |
You supported my candidacy in my recently completed request for adminship. The debated ended 40/4/1 and I'm now an administrator. I'd just like to say thanks for taking the time to consider me, and thanks for the confidence in me. I hope your confidence in me proves to be justified.
Regards, WilyD |
[edit] FPC Nominee
OK, everything's fine as far as I can see. The creator of the photograph is fr:Utilisateur:Yogi. By the way, you don't have to load anything from Commons to make the nomination, just do the same thing you would do with an image on Wikipedia.--Pharos 19:02, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] D&D wiki project consensus
A call to all members of the D&D wiki project. We are currently having a major dispute that needs to be settled by all members of the D&D wiki project. The dispute is as follows. 1. Should we put disambiguation tags on D&D articles preemptively or should we wait until there is an article conflict with some other Wikipedia article. Vote on preemptive or wait.
2. What should we label these tags? Example "child's play (module)", or "child's play (adventure)" and at this point we are taking all suggestions.
email me at Dm2ortiz@aol.com or post on the D&D wiki project talk page Dm2ortiz 13:43, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Alternative music June 2007 Newsletter
|
Issue 3 - June 2007 |
|
|
Riana, Kyjb70 and Scarps joined the alternative music fold during June.
|
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 00:45, 1 July 2007 (UTC) .
[edit] AfD Help
Hi, six of my articles have put up by AfD by the same person and are being voted on all by the same persons.. I was wondering if you could look the articles over and the things written on the discussion pages and give me your honest answer as to should they be up for vote or am I being paranoid? The articles are:
- Miguel Luis Tamargo-Bautista
- Vinagre Portillo
- Alonso J. del Portillo-Tamargo
- Alonso R. del Portillo
- Alonso del Portillo-Marcano
- Alonso del Portillo-del Junco
Last week I lost one of my articles and I thought it was a good faith AfD but now with six more up for vote this week I think there is more behind these AfD then good faith. Callelinea 13:27, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Alternative music July 2007 Newsletter
|
Issue 4 - July 2007 |
|
|
Killereditors, Xihix, M2Ys4U and Lostvalley joined the alternative music fold during July.
|
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 21:36, 2 August 2007 (UTC) .
[edit] WikiProject Alternative music August 2007 Newsletter
|
Issue 5 - August 2007 |
|
|
Freaky4jesus32, Razorblade666, and Grim-Gym joined the alternative music fold during August.
|
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 00:52, 3 September 2007 (UTC) .
WikiProject Alternative music September 2007 Newsletter
|
Issue 6 - September 2007 |
|
|
User:Dihydrogen Monoxide and User:Connorhalsell joined the alternative music fold during September.
|
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated Xihix 23:11, 6 October 2007 (UTC) .
WikiProject Alternative music October 2007 Newsletter
|
Issue 7 - October 2007 |
|
|
Sorchah and Tarc joined the alternative music fold during October.
|
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated xihix(talk) 23:09, 8 November 2007 (UTC) .
WikiProject Alternative music November 2007 Newsletter
|
Issue 8 - November 2007 |
|
|
Cambrant, Chickpeaface, Atlantik and Thelastfetusdying joined the alternative music fold during November.
|
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated xihix(talk) 00:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Alternative music December 2007 Newsletter
|
Issue 9 - December 2007 |
|
|
Pjoef, WeBuriedOurSecretsInTheGarden, Argezas, Pbroks13 and Paper Back Writer 23 joined the alternative music fold during December.
|
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated xihix(talk) 05:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC) .
[edit] Happy Birthday
| Happy Birthday | from the Birthday Committee | |
|---|---|---|
  Wishing St.daniel a very happy birthday on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Don't forget to save us all a piece of cake! |
||
-- Idontknow610 (WANNA SIGN??) 12:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] More birthday greetings
[edit] WikiProject Alternative music January 2008 Newsletter
|
Issue 10 - January 2008 |
|
|
Skeeker, Dethzone, Sceptre, IN THE EFFIGY, Crislee 88, Grrrlriot and Indopug joined the alternative music fold during January.
|
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated xihix(talk) 00:13, 2 February 2008 (UTC) .
[edit] WikiProject Alternative music Newsletters
|
Issue 12 - March 2008 |
|
|
NewMarqueeDayMoonRising, Thundermaster, and SuperNeek joined the alternative music fold during March.
|
If you missed last the previous newsletter, you can find it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative music/Newsletter/February 2008.
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated Giggabot (talk) 09:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism
Thank you for providing those helpful links. :) Oore (talk) 01:43, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Alternative music Newsletter
|
Issue 13 - April 2008 |
|
|
Arleach, Panic!out, N0tverycreative, and Gallagher2x2 joined the alternative music fold during April.
|
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated Giggabot (talk) 09:24, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Hows it goin?
Came by your page from a fellow user and I have noticed your not very active recently but i saw the message on your user page and i just couldn't resist to give a fellow wikipedian a hello. I know sometimes how you feel and i always appreciate it when people get in touch with me for whatever reason. The Wikipedian community is so big that you really are a small tadpole in the ocean if you know what i mean. But dont think we all take your contributions for granted, you keep doing what you do and i hope you can join us more often in helping this project get better. You really have to look at the big picture sometimes and that really puts it in perspective. Thanks and all the best my fellow wikipedian! Roadrunnerz45 (talk 2 me) 11:55, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Alternative music newsletter
|
Issue 14 - May 2008 |
|
|
Seraphim Whipp, Guitardude3600, Lunar Jesters, Kristmace, Freedom (song), TwentiethApril1986, JD554, Thom, and Sethward joined the alternative music fold during May.
|
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated Giggabot (stop!) 07:44, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
