Stéphane Dion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hon. Stéphane Maurice Dion  PC, MP, Ph.D.
Dion at the 2006 Liberal Party leadership convention
Leader of Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition
Incumbent
Assumed office  December 6, 2006
Preceded by	Bill Graham (interim)
11th Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada
Incumbent
Assumed office  December 2, 2006
Preceded by	Bill Graham (interim)
MP for Saint-Laurent–Cartierville
Incumbent
Assumed office  March 25, 1996
Preceded by	Shirley Maheu
Minister of the Environment
In office July 20, 2004 – February 6, 2006
Preceded by	David Anderson
Succeeded by	Rona Ambrose
President of the Canadian Privy Council
In office March 25, 1996 – December 11, 2003
Preceded by	Marcel Massé
Succeeded by	Denis Coderre
Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs
In office March 25, 1996 – December 11, 2003
Preceded by	Marcel Massé
Succeeded by	Pierre Pettigrew
Born	September 28, 1955 (1955-09-28) (age 52) Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
Political party	Liberal Party of Canada
Spouse	Janine Krieber
Children	Jeanne
Alma mater	Université Laval
Profession	Author professor of political science
Religion	Roman Catholic (Secular)
Website	Liberal.ca

Stéphane Maurice Dion, PC, MP (born September 28, 1955, in Quebec City, Quebec) is the leader of the Liberal Party of Canada and Leader of Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition in the Canadian House of Commons. Since 1996, he has been the Member of Parliament for the riding of Saint-Laurent–Cartierville in Montreal.

Dion is a former academic who served as a cabinet minister under Jean Chrétien and Paul Martin. Like all former Cabinet ministers, he is a member of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada, and has the right to the style "The Honourable" and the postnominal "PC" for life.^[1]

Contents 1 Life before politics 2 Early political life 3 Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs (January 1996 - December 2003) 3.1 Clarity of referendum question 3.2 Supreme Court reference re Secession of Quebec 3.3 The three letters 3.4 First International Conference on Federalism 3.5 Clarity Act 3.6 Reactions to Clarity Act 3.7 Views on federalism 4 Gomery Inquiry and 2004 election (January 2004–July 2004) 5 Minister of the Environment (July 2004–February 2006) 6 Liberal Leadership candidate (April 2006-December 2006) 7 As Leader of Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition (December 2006–present) 7.1 Parliamentary Opposition 7.2 Internal discord 8 Miscellaneous 9 Notes and references 10 External links

Life before politics

Stéphane Dion is the second of five children born to Quebec academic Léon Dion, a noted federalist, and to Denyse Dion, a real-estate agent born in Paris, France. Dion was raised in a modest home on Liegeois Boulevard in the Sillery district of Quebec City. While growing up, he remembers being taunted for his family's secularism in a society which was then predominantly Catholic.^[2]

He studied political science at Université Laval in the department co-founded by his father.^[3], and this was also where he met his future wife, Janine Krieber, a fellow-student in the same program. He obtained BA and MA degrees in 1977 and 1979 respectively (his master's thesis presented an analysis of the evolution of Parti Québécois electoral strategies^[4]), after which he and Janine departed together for France.

Dion was involved with the sovereignty movement, first as a teenager attending a Jesuit college in Quebec City,^[5], and later as a university student campaigning for Parti Québécois candidate Louise Beaudoin in the 1976 election.^[6] Mr. Dion described his experience as follows:

"Because the party was there... I wanted to challenge my dad... the way to become an adult sometimes is to say the contrary to your father. Each evening, I would try out a new argument I had heard on the separatist network and my father was demolishing it... My father very quietly and very respectfully was refuting me, without insulting me."^[5]

Dion has said that his involvement as "an activist for the separatist cause" ended during a five-hour, rum-and-coke fuelled discussion with a federalist household while he was going door-to-door for the PQ, but he did not openly commit to federalism until much later. At the time of the 1980 referendum, his sentiments were neutral. In his own words, the 'no' victory left him "neither moved nor outraged. To tell the truth, I sensed no particular feeling." ("Moi, je ne me sentais ni ému ni révolté. À vrai dire, je n'éprouvais aucun sentiment particulier.")^[7]

Dion spent four years in Paris, living with Janine in the Montmartre district and studying public administration under the tutelage of noted sociologist Michel Crozier. Professor Denis St. Martin, a former colleague at the Université de Montréal, later remarked: "... his vision of Canada was very influenced by his views on the politics and society of France – very Cartesian, very much about clarity...." .^[8], After receiving a doctorate (doctorat d'état) in sociology from the Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris (commonly known as Sciences Po), Dr. Dion worked briefly as a teaching assistant at the Université de Moncton in 1984 before moving on to the Université de Montréal to assume an assistant professor position. Dion taught at the Université de Montréal from 1984 to January 1996, specializing in the study of public administration and organizational analysis and theory, and was a guest scholar at the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C. during a 1990–91 sabbatical leave.^[9]

After the failure of the Meech Lake Accord in 1990, Dion directed his intellectual inquiry towards an analysis of Quebec nationalism. His decisive conversion to federalism, as he later recounted to journalist Michel Vastel, occurred as he was preparing for a presentation in Washington:

"I was seated before my computer at 11 o'clock, and, at noon, I had a text that was so interesting that the Americans wanted to publish it. It was that day that I realized I was truly a federalist." (« Je me suis assis devant mon ordinateur à 11 h et, à midi, j'avais un texte tellement intéressant que les Américains ont voulu le publier. C'est ce jour-là que je me suis rendu compte que j'étais vraiment fédéraliste. »)^[7]

In this period, the sovereignty movement had begun to promote the idea that federalism was inefficient for Quebec due to the duplication and overlap between the two levels of government. An expert in public administration, Dion emerged as a key figure in publicly criticizing this line of argument. His appearances on Le Point, a Télévision de Radio-Canada current affairs program, brought him to the attention of Aline Chrétien, who in the days following the close referendum defeat urged her husband, Prime Minister Jean Chrétien, to recruit him.^[5]

Between 1987 and 1995, Dion published a number of books and articles on political science, public administration and management.^[10]. A collection of Dion's speeches and writings on Canadian unity was published under the title Straight Talk (Le pari de la franchise) in 1999.^[11]) Dion was also a guest scholar at the Laboratoire d'économie publique de Paris from 1994 to 1995, a Co-editor of the Canadian Journal of Political Science from 1990 to 1993, and a research fellow at the Canadian Centre for Management Development (now part of the Canada School of Public Service) from 1990 to 1991.^[9]

In April 1986, Stéphane Dion married Janine Krieber, and later the same year, they adopted their only child, Jeanne.^[8] Janine Krieber, an "expert in strategic studies and counterterrorism issues,"^[2] now teaches political science and sociology at Royal Military College's ASU Saint-Jean campus in Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu.

Early political life

In anticipation of by-elections in early 1996, Jean Chrétien appointed two new "star candidates" from Quebec – Stéphane Dion and Pierre Pettigrew – to Cabinet. On January 25, 1996, Dion was named Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs, Pettigrew was named Minister for International Cooperation, and both were sworn into the Queen's Privy Council for Canada.

Chrétien felt safe in appointing Dion to Cabinet because Dion was slated to run in Saint-Laurent–Cartierville, the second-safest Liberal riding in Quebec. In the March 25 by-election, he was easily elected. This was not without precedent; in 1941, Mackenzie King had appointed Louis St. Laurent to Cabinet after nominating him to run in a safe Quebec riding. Dion won a full term in the general election of 1997, and was reelected again in the 2000, 2004, and 2006 elections.

Dion continued to serve as Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs until the end of Jean Chrétien's ministry on December 12, 2003.

Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs (January 1996 - December 2003)

Clarity of referendum question

In his responsibilities as Intergovernmental Affairs minister in the Jean Chrétien government, Dion was tasked with challenging the arguments of the Quebec sovereignty movement much more vigorously than in the pre-referendum period. The people of Quebec voted against the sovereignty option by a razor-thin margin (50.58% to 49.42%). Many federalists in Ottawa were caught off-guard by the results and believed that the referendum results would have no legal standing under Canadian law. The strongest complaints were on the presumed ambiguity of the 1995 question and the fact that Quebec had passed a law reserving the right for the National Assembly to declare independence unilaterally if constitutional negotiations with the Government of Canada failed.

Supreme Court reference re Secession of Quebec

On September 30, 1996, Dion submitted three questions to the Supreme Court of Canada constituting the Supreme Court Reference re Secession of Quebec:

1. Under the Constitution of Canada, can the National Assembly, legislature, or government of Quebec effect the secession of Quebec from Canada unilaterally?
2. Does international law give the National Assembly, legislature, or government of Quebec the right to effect the secession of Quebec from Canada unilaterally? In this regard, is there a right to self-determination under international law that would give the National Assembly, legislature or government of Quebec the right to effect the secession of Quebec from Canada unilaterally?
3. In the event of a conflict between domestic and international law on the right of the National Assembly, legislature, or government of Quebec to effect the secession of Quebec from Canada unilaterally, which would take precedence in Canada?

As soon as these questions were made public, both parties of the National Assembly, the Bloc Québécois and numerous federalists denounced Ottawa's gesture. An Act respecting the exercise of the fundamental rights and prerogatives of the Québec people and the Québec State was passed in the National Assembly of Quebec by the Parti Québécois government two days after the Clarity Act had been introduced in the Canadian House of Commons.

On August 20, 1998, the Supreme Court answered, concluding that Quebec does not have the right to secede unilaterally under Canadian or international law. However, the federal government would have to enter into negotiations with the Quebec government if Quebeckers expressed a clear will to secede. It confirmed that the Canadian Parliament had the power to determine whether or not a referendum question was clear enough to trigger such negotiations. The Canadian constitution would remain in effect until terms of secession were agreed to by all parties involved, and these terms would have to respect principles of democracy, minority and individual rights as outlined in the Canadian constitution.^[12]

Both the government of Quebec and the government of Canada publicly stated that they were very pleased with the opinion of the Supreme Court, which stated both that Quebec could not legally separate unilaterally from Canada and that the Canadian Parliament would have a 'political obligation' to enter into separation negotiations with Quebec in the event that a clear majority of its populace were to vote in favor of independence.

The three letters

The Supreme Court reference launched a public debate between Dion and members of the Parti Québécois government in open letters published in the press.^[13].^[14][15] Following Lucien Bouchard's open letter to the Premier of New Brunswick, Frank McKenna, in 1997 defending the legality of a unilateral secession, Dion wrote the first of three open letters to leaders in the sovereignty movement. Dion challenged three assertions that Bouchard had made: that a unilateral declaration of independence is supported by international law; that a majority of "50% plus one" was a sufficient threshold for secession; and that international law would protect the territorial integrity of Quebec following a secession. Against the first assertion, Dion argued that the vast majority of international law experts "believe that the right to declare secession unilaterally does not belong to constituent entities of a democratic country such as Canada."^[13] In regard to the simple majority argument, Dion argued that due to the momentous changes to Quebecers' lives that would result from secession, a simple majority that could disappear in the face of difficulties would be insufficient to ensure the political legitimacy of the sovereignist project. In regard to the territorial integrity of Quebec, Dion retorts that "there is neither a paragraph nor a line in international law that protects Quebec's territory but not Canada's. International experience demonstrates that the borders of the entity seeking independence can be called into question, sometimes for reasons based on democracy."^[13]

Dion's second open letter, to Quebec's intergovernmental affairs minister Jacques Brassard, came on November 19, 1997. Dion expanded upon his earlier arguments against the territorial integrity of Quebec following secession by highlighting the inconsistency in the argument that Canada is divisible but Quebec is not. Secondly, Dion underscored that without recognition by the Government of Canada and when opposed by a strong minority of citizens, a unilateral declaration of independence faces much difficulty in gaining international recognition.^[14].

In Dion's third open letter to Premier Lucien Bouchard came on August 25, 1998, shortly after the Supreme Court ruling on Secession had been handed down. He criticized the Quebec premier for accepting some aspects of the ruling (such as the political obligation for the Government of Canada to negotiate secession following a clear expression of will from the people of Quebec) and not other sections of the ruling (such as the need for a clear majority on a clear question and the unconstitutionality of a unilateral declaration of independence). In regard to the ruling, Dion makes three claims: that the federal government has a role in the selection of the question and the level of support required for it to pass, that secession can only be achieved through negotiation rather than a "unilateral declaration of independence", and that the terms of negotiation could not be decided solely by the Government of Quebec.^[15]

First International Conference on Federalism

Dion organized and hosted the First International Conference on Federalism in Mont Tremblant in October 1999 to foster international support for the cause of federalism in Canada. Quebec sovereignist leaders were granted a prominent role in the conference and used their floor time to denounce Canadian federalism to an international audience to the great annoyance of their federalist host. But Dion's views got a big boost during the closing speech by United States President Bill Clinton. Clinton appeared to echo the Supreme Court Reference, warning that "when a people thinks it should be independent in order to have a meaningful political existence, serious questions should be asked.... Are minority rights as well as majority rights respected? How are we going to co-operate with our neighbours?". Clinton argued that federalism allows peoples seeking recognition of their identity a way to do so without isolating themselves in a nation-state. The speech laid to rest any doubts about the U.S. position on the legality and desirability of unilateral secession in Quebec.^[16]

Clarity Act

The Supreme Court reference and three letters formed the basis for the Clarity Act (Bill C-20) presented by Dion to the House of Commons on December 13, 1999.^[17] The legislation established the conditions under which the Government of Canada would enter into negotiations that might lead to secession following a vote by one of the provinces. It stipulated that in order to lead to separation negotiations, a referendum on independence in a given province would have to have "clearly" (according to the judgment of the Canadian House of Commons) framed its question to voters in terms of independence, and that the result would have to be a "clear majority" in favour, rather than a "50% plus one" majority. It was passed by the House on March 15, 2000

Reactions to Clarity Act

The Clarity Act was supported by the Liberals and Reform Party in Parliament. Most in the NDP supported it too, but leader Jack Layton was opposed. Progressive Conservative Party, led by Joe Clark, also opposed the Act. The Act was more bitterly denounced by all provincial parties in the Quebec National Assembly, the Bloc Québécois, and many Quebec federalists. Following its adoption by Parliament, an open letter supporting Quebec's right to self-determination was published and signed by numerous intellectuals from Quebec and other parts of Canada. William Johnson, leader of Quebec's largest anglophone rights group, Alliance Quebec said the Act would prevent misinformation by sovereignists on the topic of secession.^[18]

Dion's vigorous opposition to Quebec sovereignist claims appears to have had the desired effect: Support for Sovereignty-Association plummeted to 24% in October 1999 after the Supreme Court reference.^[19] Jean Chrétien cites the act as one of his greatest achievements as Prime Minister. Attacks on the Act also were aimed at Dion personally in French-speaking Quebec under the perception that he had undermined fundamental democratic rights to self-determination. Serge Chapleau, the caricaturist for La Presse, began portraying Dion as a rat, while Parti Québécois leader Bernard Landry called Dion "the most hated politician in the history of Quebec" ("le politicien le plus détesté de l'histoire du Québec").^[20].

Views on federalism

Dion has often been described in Quebec as a Trudeau centralist due to his strong defense of Canadian federalism and forceful arguments against Quebec sovereignists. However, his position on federalism is far more nuanced. It would be most accurate to describe him as a federal autonomist. While Dion supports cooperation, flexibility, and interdependence in the Canadian federation, he unequivocally argues against jurisdictional intrusion by stating that "the Constitution must be respected. We must do away with the all-too-convenient excuse that a given governmental initiative responds to a need that is too urgent to be stymied by issues of 'jurisdiction.' Infringement of jurisdiction creates confusion which damages the quality of public policy." Dion's position on provincial rights is not only the result of respect for the Constitution of Canada, but also a strategy to prevent the "joint decision trap" in which the capacity of a government's ability to act is restricted by the need for approval from the other constituent governments.

Dion has contested the political concentration on the division of powers between the federal and provincial governments, arguing that:

"... [I]dentity, rather than the division of powers, that is at the source of our unity problem. Francophone Quebecers want the assurance that their language and culture can flourish with the support of other Canadians. They want to feel that their language and culture are seen by other Canadians as an important asset, rather than a burden. They want the assurance that they can be both Quebecers and Canadians, and that they don't have to choose between Quebec and Canada."^[21]

In the same vein, Dion was the planner of the 1999 social union agreement, which, according to rabble.ca journalist Duncan Cameron, limited the national spending jurisdiction. [1]

Gomery Inquiry and 2004 election (January 2004–July 2004)

Dion had a prominent role within the Chrétien administration at the time of the sponsorship scandal, and his position as "National Unity" minister (an unofficial term for the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs) made him a figure of particular interest to the subsequent Commission of Inquiry into the Sponsorship Program and Advertising Activities (the Gomery Commission). He stated before the Gomery Commission that although in mid-2001 he was aware of the disproportionately large percentage of sponsorship funds going to Quebec, he was never directly involved in the administration of the program.^[22] Indeed, Dion had been critical of the program while in cabinet, and openly doubted that it would do much to sway Quebecers from sovereignty.^[23]Along with most of the other ministers in the Chrétien cabinet, Dion was exonerated of all responsibility in the affair in the Phase I report of the Gomery Commission:

"On the evidence there is no basis for attributing blame or responsibility to any other Minister of the Chrétien Cabinet [excepting Jean Chrétien and Alfonso Gagliano], since they, like all members of Parliament, were not informed of the initiatives being authorized by Mr. [Jean] Pelletier and their funding from the Unity Reserve."^[24]

In early 2007, after winning the Liberal Party leadership, Dion suggested that Marc-Yvan Côté's lifetime ban against rejoining the party may have been an excessive punishment for Côté's involvement in the scandal. He later clarified his remarks, saying that he would not take any steps to reinstate Côté's party membership and that such reinstatement would probably not occur. Dion has also defended Jean Pelletier, saying that the former Mayor of Quebec City had "served the country well for decades."^[25][26]

After Paul Martin's assumption of the office of Prime Minister, Dion was dropped from Cabinet as part of a general effort to dissociate the new Liberal government from the outgoing Chrétien administration. He was also criticized by Jean Lapierre, Martin's new Quebec Lieutenant. Lapierre was a Quebec nationalist and founder of the Bloc Québécois and his views on intergovernmental relations differed significantly from Dion's. At one stage in the buildup to the 2004 election, Lapierre described Dion's Clarity Act as "useless", and although Manitoba Premier Gary Doer said the legislation was "extremely popular" in Western Canada, Martin defended Lapierre by saying that the Act would make little difference under his administration. An unconfirmed CTV report in 2004 claimed that Martin's organizers were planning a nomination challenge in Dion's riding.^[27]

At the time of the June 2004 federal election, Liberal support had dropped significantly, especially in Quebec where various members of the party had been implicated in the Sponsorship scandal. The Liberal campaign rebounded somewhat in its final days, but the Liberals were still reduced to a minority government due in part to their defeat in Quebec at the hands of the Bloc Québécois.^[27].

With Quebec MPs in short supply, Paul Martin brought Dion in from the cold, returning him to the front benches on July 20, 2004 as Minister of the Environment.^[28]

Minister of the Environment (July 2004–February 2006)

Shortly after his appointment, a Globe and Mail article described Dion as being "bent on transforming the environment dossier from the traditional tree-hugger's last stand into a forward-thinking economic portfolio."^[29] Dion championed a "new industrial revolution" focussed on "environmentally-sustainable technologies and products",^[30] and he sought to nurture a collaborative relationship with big business rather than a confrontational one.^[31] His maiden speech before the Calgary Chamber of Commerce illustrates just how accommodating he was ready to be: "Calgary is one of Canada's most impressive economic engines.... Alberta could soon be the second-largest oil-exporting jurisdiction on Earth, behind Saudi Arabia. This is tremendous blessing for Canada."^[30] In October 2005, Dion nominated oil and gas executive Allan Amey to head up the government's $1-billion Clean Fund, the largest single element in Dion's Kyoto implementation strategy.^[32]

Dion's ministry declined to protect Sakinaw and Cultus sockeye salmon under the Species at Risk Act because it "could cost the sockeye fishing industry $125 million in lost revenue by 2008,"^[33]. This led to some criticism from environmentalists.^[34]

Dion earned high praise for his work chairing the U.N. Climate Change summit (COP 11/MOP 1) in Montreal in 2005.^[35] Later, when Dion's record as environment minister was under scrutiny in the closing days of the Liberal leadership campaign, former Sierra Club of Canada director and current leader of the Green Party of Canada Elizabeth May came to his defence, calling him a "very very good environment minister."^[36]

The government did not make significant progress towards reducing Canada's greenhouse gas emissions during Dion's brief tenure in office.^[37] In April 2005, Dion unveiled his "Project Green" to combat climate change, but the program was immediately criticized by some environmental groups for being too timid and for lacking in meaningful regulations.^[38] Johanne Gélinas, Canada's environment commissioner, criticized the government's stewardship of marine areas and national parks, as well as its efforts to ensure the safety of drinking water.^{[39][40][41][42]}

In February 2006, after the Liberals had been defeated and the Conservatives had taken over the reins of government, Dion said that Canada would very likely not be able to reach its Kyoto targets. Nevertheless, he argued that this was missing the point:

"Everyone is saying target, target. But ... it is to be more than to reach a target. It's to change the economy. It's to have resource productivity, energy efficiency when we know that energy will be the next crisis for the economy of the world.... All my ministries will be green. Maybe I'll make one department of industry and the environment -- a department of sustainability. That's not a commitment, but if you want to change the mind, you have to change structure...."^[43]

Liberal Leadership candidate (April 2006-December 2006)

See also: Liberal Party of Canada leadership convention, 2006

See also: 2006 Liberal leadership bid by Stéphane Dion

Stéphane Dion announced his candidacy on April 7, the day of the official beginning of the Liberal leadership race.^[44] His leadership campaign was referred to as the three-pillar approach. This approach focused on social justice, economic prosperity, and environmental sustainability, and a claim that a combination of these pillars would bring Canada into the 21st century.^[45]He said that his campaign would focus on sustainable development of the economy and creating a "hyper-educated" Canadian workforce in order to compete with China.^[46]

Dion was a lower-key figure during most of the leadership race, with much of the media and political attention being centered on the race's two most high-profile candidates, Michael Ignatieff and former Ontario New Democratic Party premier Bob Rae. Federal NDP leader Jack Layton described Dion as "A man of principle and conviction and therefore almost certain not to be elected leader of the Liberal party."^[47] For much of the campaign, front-runner Ignatieff had the strongest support in Dion's home province of Quebec. Dion's level of support was similar to that of former Ontario cabinet minister Gerard Kennedy, both candidates being in a distant third/fourth place, though still significantly higher than the other four leadership contestants.

On December 2, 2006 at the Liberal Party leadership convention, Dion finished third after the first ballot, garnering 17.8% of the delegates. After the second ballot, Gerard Kennedy threw his support behind Dion. Earlier, the two leadership contenders had allegedly struck a pact in which the first off the ballot would throw his support to the other. Pundits said that this surprise move had caught the Ignatieff and Rae strategists off guard. [2] When the totals of the third ballot were released, Dion held a narrow lead with 37%, followed closely by Michael Ignatieff with 34.5%. Bob Rae, with only 28.5%, freed his delegates, many of whom backed Dion, as did former leadership candidates Ken Dryden and Joe Volpe. On the fourth ballot, Dion captured 54.7% of votes cast and was declared the 11th leader of the Liberal Party of Canada.

As Leader of Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition (December 2006–present)

After Stéphane Dion was elected as the leader, the Liberal Party experienced a sudden surge in their poll numbers. The Conservatives regained their lead shortly thereafter, although the parties were again tied for support in the summer of 2007. (for polling specifics, see the "Opinion polls" section of the 40th Canadian federal election article).

As rumours circulated of a possible election in early 2007, Dion bolstered the image of a Liberal Party renewed and healed of its internal divisions by appointing many of his former leadership rivals to key campaign positions. Michael Ignatieff was named deputy leader, Bob Rae and Scott Brison became platform development co-chairs, Gerard Kennedy was named special adviser for election readiness and renewal, Martha Hall Findlay was charged with platform outreach, and Ken Dryden, who received special acknowledgement from Dion for being "the heart of our party", was tasked "to be everywhere".^[48]

In early January 2007, Dion made a leadership decision in regards to Wajid Khan, a Liberal MP who was serving as a Middle-East advisor to the Prime Minister. Dion thought it was inappropriate for a member of the Official Opposition to be serving the government so he told Khan to give up the position. Dion was confident that Khan would stay with the caucus and give up advising the Prime Minister,^[49] but Khan chose to cross the floor, and join the Conservative caucus instead.^[50]

On January 18, 2007, Dion unveiled the remainder of the Liberal opposition's shadow cabinet (see Official Opposition Shadow Cabinet (Canada) for a complete list of appointments).^[51] Shortly after Dion lead the Liberal caucus in its rejection of the 2007 Conservative budget, arguing that it failed Canadians on economic prosperity, social justice and environmental sustainability.^[52]

In response, the Conservatives would launch a series of attack ads aimed directly at Dion, attacking his leadership abilities and record as Environment Minister^[53] Similar ads attacking Dion would appear in November over statements that Dion would prefer new spending on health care and social programs to cuts to the Goods and Services Tax introduced by the Conservatives.^[54]

Parliamentary Opposition

The neutrality of this section is disputed. Please see the discussion on the talk page.(February 2008) Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved.

On February 1, Dion tabled a motion challenging the Conservatives to reaffirm Canada's commitment to the Kyoto Protocol, attempting to capitalized on a 2002 letter in which Prime Minister Harper described the Accord as a "socialist scheme" that is based on "tentative and contradictory scientific evidence" and designed to suck money out of rich countries.^[55] Tory environment minister John Baird responded by blaming the Liberals for what he described as a "shameful record over 13 years of inaction on the environment,"^[55] while Stephen Harper said that his government would "stabilize emissions."^[56] Dion's non-binding motion passed on February 5.^[57]

On February 27, Dion's Liberals, together with Bloc Québécois and NDP members of Parliament, voted down a Harper government proposal to extend two controversial provisions of the Anti-Terrorism Act for another three years. Dion argued that the measures – which allowed police to arrest and detain terror suspects for three days without a warrant and which allowed judges to force witnesses to testify in terror cases – "have done nothing to fight against terrorism" and "have not been helpful and have continued to create some risk for civil liberties."^[58]

Facing taunts from the Prime Minister over perceived policy reversals^[59] regarding Afghanistan, carbon taxes, and anti-terror measures,^{[60][opinion needs balancing]} diminished Liberal support in polls (see "Opinion polls" section of 40th Canadian federal election article), and an apparent waning of enthusiasm for his leadership,^{[61][opinion needs balancing]} Dion initiated a 2+¹⁄₂ week cross-country tour on March 2, starting off with a speech delivered in Dartmouth, Nova Scotia. The tour sought to refocus public attention on the broader "three pillars" (economic growth, social justice, environmental sustainability) of his political programme,^[62] and included a series of speeches highlighting Liberal platform positions on social programs, finance, crime prevention, and First Nations' issues. It culminated in the unveiling of a new environmental policy endorsing the implementation of "hard caps" on greenhouse gas emissions for companies in high-polluting sectors. Companies would be forced to pay into a green accounts when they exceeded absolute emissions targets, and make withdrawals for new green projects. Dion criticized Harper government policies of "intensity-based" cuts which allowed polluters to increase their absolute emissions. NDP Leader Jack Layton criticized Dion, as he had supported "intensity based" cuts in the past^[63]

On April 12, 2007, Dion announced that the Liberals would not run a candidate against Green Party leader Elizabeth May in the Nova Scotia riding of Central Nova (currently represented by Conservative Peter MacKay) in return for the Green Party leader's agreement not to run a Green candidate in Dion's riding of Saint-Laurent—Cartierville.^[64] The deal was criticized by the Conservatives and the NDP (Jack Layton had rejected earlier attempts by May to cut a "backroom" deal with his party^[65][66]), and also by some within the Liberal Party.^[67] Dion later gave reassurance that the controversial deal was "an exceptional circumstance where Liberal voters are invited to help her [May] to win against Peter MacKay."^[68]

On November 8, 2007, Dion released a policy plan, that he compared to the United Kingdom's Labour Party under former Prime Minister Tony Blair. Dion mentioned that his party will tackle poverty in Canada in order to create a "greener", "richer" and "fairer" Canada. He set up targets to reduce general poverty by 30 percent and child poverty by 50 percent as well as helping working families with work rewards as well as increasing the Canada Child Tax benefit, increasing guaranteed revenues for seniors.^[69] In an editorial in the National Post, economist Alex MacMillan notes that the poverty targets Dion has set are based on a Statistics Canada measure that the statistical agency has stated is not a poverty measure (LICO), and that by using what is in effect a relative income measure rather than an absolute poverty measure, Dion is essentially aiming to flatten the income distribution of Canadians.^{[70][opinion needs balancing]}

In 2008, as part of a measure for cutting greenhouse emissions, Dion called for a carbon price but did not called it a tax. He also praised a similar measure introduced and approved by the British Columbia government in the 2008 provincial budget as well as the province of Quebec that introduced a carbon-based tax which revenues will be used for green technologies. ^[71] Critics from other parties as well as some Liberal MPs said that the plan "is too confusing, expensive and politically risky". ^[72] Environmontal Minister John Baird told that the plan was "made on Bay Street" and is actually supported by big business and polluters". The plan received support from David Suzuki who've added that on CTV's Question Period that: "To oppose (the carbon tax plan), its just nonsense. It's certainly the way we got to go". ^[73]

Internal discord

The first federal by-elections contested by the Liberals under Dion's leadership took place on September 18, 2007 in three Quebec ridings: Roberval—Lac-Saint-Jean, Outremont and Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot. The party's candidates were defeated by large margins in all three races. The Outremont by-election was deemed a crucial test for Dion's leadership by some pundits, as it had been held by the Liberals almost uninterruptedly since 1935.^[74] Others said it was a "poor measure of where the parties really stand."^[75].Dion's handpicked candidate Jocelyn Coulon was defeated by the NDP's Thomas Mulcair. A Dion aide blamed the Outremont by-election on several factors, including poor organization, lack of communications, and lack of a clear policy on Quebec, while former MP Jean Lapierre suggested that it was due to Dion's 14% approval rating in the province. [3] In addition, the Halifax Chronicle-Herald reported that unidentified "Dion loyalists" were accusing Michael Ignatieff supporters of undermining by-election efforts. Though Ignatieff phoned up Dion to deny the allegations, the Globe and Mail suggested that the report had a negative impact on the Liberals' morale, citing the NDP's widening lead after the article's release. [4] [5] [6] Undaunted, Dion declared: "From this defeat, we can learn something and work together as a united party.."^[76]

On September 23, 2007, Liberal Party national director Jamie Carroll sparked controversy when, during discussions about whether francophone Quebecers should be hired in order to appeal to francophone voters, he commented: "Do we also have to hire people from the Chinese community to represent the Chinese community?" Carroll argued that the comment was taken out of context, but it nevertheless raised the hackles of many Liberals in Quebec, prompting calls from MPs Pablo Rodriguez and Liza Frulla for Carroll to be fired. Stéphane Dion affirmed Carroll's version of events and rejected calls for Carroll's dismissal.^[77] On October 10, a Liberal press release announced Carroll's resignation and commended him for his "loyalty to our leader and to our party".^[78]

Marcel Proulx resigned as Dion's Quebec lieutenant hours before the Harper government's throne speech, taking the fall for the three by-election losses. Dion first approached Montreal MPs Denis Coderre and Pablo Rodriguez to succeed Proulx, but they declined. That evening he named Senator Céline Hervieux-Payette to the vacant post.[7] While the Party was divided on whether or not the government should be toppled on a confidence vote regarding the Throne Speech, Dion mentioned in a statement in the House of Commons on October 17 that the Liberals will support the Throne Speech but with major amendments including the Kyoto Protocol and the end of mission in Afghanistan by 2009 and had criticized the government on several aspects including the economy, seniors and child poverty, the crime policy, the Senate reform. The latter amendment proposal was rejected by the New Democratic Party who are favoring an immediate end to the mission. Dion explained the decision as that the Canadians are not willing to have a third election in just over three years.^[79]. All Liberal members abstained from voting on the Throne Speech on October 24, 2007 which passed 126–79.^[80]

Marc Garneau initially stated that he was not part of Dion's vision after being passed over for a riding nomination. Since then, Dion and Garneau have reconciled, and Garneau will run to succeed outgoing longtime MP Lucienne Robillard in Westmount-Ville-Marie.[8][9]

The Liberal Party won three of four by-elections held on March 17, 2008, as Dion's former leadership rivals Bob Rae and Martha Hall Findlay won convincing victories in Toronto Centre and Willowdale and Joyce Murray was narrowly returned for Vancouver Quadra. The Conservatives won a fourth contest in the northern Saskatchewan riding of Desnethé—Missinippi—Churchill River, which the Liberals had narrowly taken in the previous election. Dion declared the results a victory for his party, while also noting that some Liberal support was siphoned off to the Green Party.^[81]. Some journalists described the outcome as a mixed result for both the Liberal Party and Dion's leadership.^[82][83]

Miscellaneous

• Dion's family has a husky named "Kyoto" which they purchased "to cheer themselves up after the Liberals lost the last [2006] election."^[84] However, Dion was not the first environment minister or Liberal to have a dog by that name. David Anderson also has a schnauzer named Kyoto which he purchased one week after Canada's ratification of the Kyoto Accord.^[85]

• In May 1999, Dion was the object of a pie-in-the-face gag orchestrated by the Montreal group, les Entartistes. The group's stated focus is to "deflate" influential political figures, and they have successfully pied several Canadian federal and provincial politicians, with past targets including Jean Chrétien and Ralph Klein. Dion was not amused and pressed charges, resulting in convictions of assault against two members of the pie-throwing group.^[86] They were given suspended sentences.

• Dion holds dual citizenship through his mother, who was born in France.^[87] Other MPs holding dual citizenship include Conservative Minister of Health Tony Clement, Conservative MP Myron Thompson, and NDP caucus members Libby Davies and Olivia Chow.

Notes and references

External links

• Stéphane Dion's Campaign Site
• How'd They Vote?: Stéphane Dion's voting history and quotes
• List of federal political experience from the Library of Parliament
• Stéphane Dion Interview

Parliament of Canada
Preceded by Shirley Maheu, Liberal	Member of Parliament from Saint-Laurent—Cartierville 1996 – present	Incumbent
27th Ministry - Government of Paul Martin
Cabinet Posts (1)
Predecessor	Office	Successor
David Anderson	Minister of the Environment (2004–2006)	Rona Ambrose
26th Ministry - Government of Jean Chrétien
Cabinet Posts (2)
Predecessor	Office	Successor
Marcel Massé	Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs (1996–2003)	Pierre Pettigrew
Marcel Massé	President of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada (1996–2003)	Denis Coderre
Political offices
Preceded by Bill Graham	Leader of the Opposition in the Canadian House of Commons 2006 – present	Incumbent
Preceded by Bill Graham Interim	Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada 2006 – present	Incumbent

v • d • e Leaders of the Liberal Party of Canada Brown · Mackenzie · Blake · Laurier · King · St. Laurent · Pearson · Trudeau · Turner · Chrétien · Martin · Dion

v • d • e Ministers of the Environment Ministers of the Environment (1971-1976)1 Davis · Sauvé · LeBlanc (acting) · J. Marchand · LeBlanc (acting) Minister of Fisheries and the Environment (1976-1979) LeBlanc Minister of State (Environment) (1977-1979) L. Marchand Ministers of the Environment (1979-) L. Marchand · Fraser · Roberts · Caccia · Blais-Grenier · McMillan · Bouchard · Oberle (acting) · de Cotret · Charest · Vincent · Copps · Marchi · Stewart · Anderson · Dion · Ambrose · Baird 1From 1971 to 1976 the Minister of the Environment was also the Minister of Fisheries.

v • d • e Presidents of the Privy Council Blair · Howe · Kenny · Tupper · O'Connor · McDonald · Huntington · Cauchon · Blake · O'Connor · Masson · Mousseau · McLelan · Macdonald · Colby · Abbott · Ives · Bowell · Angers · Laurier · Borden · Rowell · Calder · Normand · King · Meighen · King · Bennett · King · St-Laurent · Chevrier · Dorion · Diefenbaker · Lamontagne · McIlraith · Favreau · Gordon · Trudeau (acting) · MacEachen (acting) · D. Macdonald · MacEachen · Sharp · MacEachen · Baker · Pinard · Ouellet · Nielsen · Hnatyshyn · Mazankowski · Clark · Blais · Massé · Dion · Coderre · Robillard · Chong · Van Loan · Ambrose