User talk:Srose/archive
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Kalevipoeg
Hey you!
Thanks for your cleanups on the Kalevipoeg article, it reads so much nicer now. If I ever get round to writing the synopses for Kalevala I hope you'll do the same there :)
--Hellahulla 21:49, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
No problem! =) I'm on a mission to clean up all Estonia-related pages. Srose 22:26, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
VanessaLuver4EvEr: Hey I didnt write the article on Vanessa Hudgens I just edited some things on the page and added her personal life well you can visit http://www.vanessa-online.com/ the #1 source. Well I don't kow how to chat with people so sorry I'm typing here.
- Hi, Vanessa - I think you meant to comment on my boyfriend's talk page. You can access it by going to his userpage here, and clicking the "Talk" link. You've got the rest pretty much down pat. :) I'll also post this on your talkpage just in case you don't check here. Srose 01:05, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
SoRRy. I'm John. Not Vanessa. Nice to meet you.
[edit] BOO!
BOO! I love you! I can't wait to see you tommorow! Yanksox 01:09, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- That was a surprise!!! :) A nice one though. Hope you don't mind I'm replying here; your talk page is so damn full. =) Check the special page. Srose 01:10, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
I have a bot that automatically archives my talk, I might increase the time, there is alot. I love you! Yanksox 01:13, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
SABLE! I Love you! Yanksox 15:14, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism revert
No problem. If you or your boyfriend need me, I'm always willing to help. :-) The King of Kings 22:08, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wow
Sabes, you're very good at making things look better (especially me ;)) I was wondering if you could use your fix 'em up powers on This article. Thanks! You are the best! Yanksox 22:45, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm disapearing right now. I'll call you. I love you! Yanksox 22:56, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
That's awesome! I love you. :) So, how is your day coming up? Yanksox 16:52, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Why? Yanksox 18:47, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Nicholas Tidemann
I think a speedy may be over the top. Dweller 12:35, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] E-mail
I sent you a couple of replys. Yanksox (talk) 16:29, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] User talk:Srose/Love
Hi there! I was wondering if you would consider deleting User talk:Srose/Love from your userspace. Please see this for the reasoning for my request. Thanks! hoopydinkConas tá tú? 12:33, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- Hi again. The actual user page (User:Srose/Love) is included in my request, if it wasn't clear (i.e. not just the talk page). Thanks again! hoopydinkConas tá tú? 12:37, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- I replied to your question on my talk page, but in case you're not watching the page, here's my message as posted on my talk page:
- Hi! Thanks for responding so quickly! The issue with the page is that it violates Wikipedia policy of what one cannot have in their userspace. Again, I'll refer you to this, which will outline what is and what isn't appropriate content to have in userspace. Wikipedia is not a blog, nor is it a proper forum for two users to carry on professing their love for one another. Though endearing, it has no place in an encyclopedia. When you check out the link I provided, please be sure to take a look at the bulletpoints. I felt it might be in your best interests to approach you directly rather than proposing the page for MfD or the like, as the content is personal and you and the other primary contributor might not want the community scrutinizing the content to determine whether it should or shouldn't be hosted by Wikipedia. Might I suggest using the telephone, or if long distance charges are a problem, Skype (which is free voice chat) or AOL Instant Messenger (free text chat). Cheers! hoopydinkConas tá tú? 17:35, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- Hi again! I replied to your recent comments left on my talk page. Since the pages were deleted, I assume the matter is closed. I thanked you on my talk page, but thanks again! hoopydinkConas tá tú? 02:46, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Hi! Thanks for responding so quickly! The issue with the page is that it violates Wikipedia policy of what one cannot have in their userspace. Again, I'll refer you to this, which will outline what is and what isn't appropriate content to have in userspace. Wikipedia is not a blog, nor is it a proper forum for two users to carry on professing their love for one another. Though endearing, it has no place in an encyclopedia. When you check out the link I provided, please be sure to take a look at the bulletpoints. I felt it might be in your best interests to approach you directly rather than proposing the page for MfD or the like, as the content is personal and you and the other primary contributor might not want the community scrutinizing the content to determine whether it should or shouldn't be hosted by Wikipedia. Might I suggest using the telephone, or if long distance charges are a problem, Skype (which is free voice chat) or AOL Instant Messenger (free text chat). Cheers! hoopydinkConas tá tú? 17:35, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- I replied to your question on my talk page, but in case you're not watching the page, here's my message as posted on my talk page:
-
[edit] Sable
I wicked did e-mail you. Yanksox (talk) 13:49, 19 June 2006 (UTC) Not yet. Yanksox (talk)
[edit] Deletion
- Ah, so sorry for the confusion. I did agree to delete the user page, but I saw no trouble with the talk page - which was deleted without my consent. Whoops! I guess I should have indicated that. Srose 15:51, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- OK, now I am confused. Should I keep it deleted - or should I reverse the deletion? - CrazyRussian talk/email 15:55, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
OK, so I will keep it deleted until you tell me unambiguously what want to do with it. - CrazyRussian talk/email 17:16, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] You're the best!
You are the best. Well, I'm off to see if I'm physically fit enough to run after small children that induce great amounts of stress. I love you. :) Yanksox (talk) 17:49, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Name Calling
Wow. I've actually recieved a few harsher comments. I hope everything is ok. My feet feel really sore. :P I love you. Yanksox 21:25, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- I think he and I both got past that misunderstanding. How was your day? Yanksox 21:29, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- I feel like a bad person, though I swore I didn't get an e-mail. I did reply to the last one. Yanksox 21:44, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you!
Hello, thank you very much for your reversion of vandalism to mine and DVokes' userpages the other day, the vandal in question is proving a huge pain at the moment (we two users are being personally targeted) and its great to have some help! Jdcooper 15:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks!
Yep. Vandalized 10 times... Thanks for reverting :) --Nick123 (t/c) 21:25, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] What template is that?
Hey there. I saw the welcome template you left at User talk:Wikitaun. I don't think I'm familiar with that particular template, and it doesn't have an <!--invisible note--> like some do so other users will know what they are even when they're substed. It looks like a good template that I might want to use some time, so I'd appreciate it if you could tell me what its name is! Thanks! --Icarus 20:21, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Barnstar Time!
 |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
| IT SPINS! Seriously though, Sable, you have contributed a great deal of Estonian articles and done major and useful copyedits in a short time. You are a very productive user and deserve recognition. Yanksox 21:13, 7 July 2006 (UTC) |
- I was asking myself if I was bias in giving it, and I may be slightly, but I was looking through your contribs, and once you got a hang of Wiki code, you did really well. Your edits in creating new articles, welcoming users, reverting vandalism, and quality copyedits garnered yourself some recognition. Yanksox 21:19, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks: --Issabella1610 19:50, 8 July 2006 (UTC)Issabella1610
[edit] Dwee
I'm there, and keeping an eye on it. Yanksox 14:36, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Viva Italia!
What a great game! Yanksox 21:43, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- It's expected for some vandalism to happen. It will die down eventually, The Sox are winning now, so it looks like a good day. :P Yanksox 21:47, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks...
Thank you for reverting my user page. Much appreciated. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 14:39, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Just so you know, your name has been mentioned over here: Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/Litch-Sarah Ewart. :) Sarah Ewart (Talk) 17:08, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- ...which is why I'm dropping by :-). Please swing by my talk page or catch me on IRC so I can hear things from your angle. Cheers and thanks! CQJ 17:53, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Thanks for the quick response. I have no clue what Litch is intending to accomplish, but I'll let you know if I need anything else. Have a nice day! CQJ 18:10, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] Work
Apparently, I'm not doing sports this week, and now I am will little kids. I'm having a grand 'ole time using these MACs. Anything fun happening in your wikilife? Yanksox 19:19, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- It's a request for meditition, don't worry about it. It will be fine. I think every side will come out of it feeling well. Yanksox 19:22, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 20:48, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] My User Page
Thank you... - Adolphus79 22:48, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Gmail
I swore, I e-mailed ya, Sabes. Hmmmm. I'll check again. Yanksox 17:39, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks!
Thank you for protecting my talk page User:Rewinn by reverting edits from anonymous. Ironically that anonymous was me, forgetting to log in; ha! my laziness led to the discovey that there are nice people in the world who will help out a stranger! Plus I copy'd a couple of your ub's so: Thanks again! rewinn 15:21, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Lookit - you have a fanclub!
Check out Srosie (talk • contribs). Probably an accidental similarity... - CrazyRussian talk/email 05:31, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
Thank you for reverting vandalism to my user page :) Mushroom (Talk) 23:45, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage, that vandal will pay... huntersquid 19:26, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Smile!
Yay! Thanks that made my wikiday. Now, I have a class and 105 degree weather to look forward to! :P Yanksox 21:13, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 68.69.160.219
That is not my IP, as mine 99/100 times starts with 64.228 as its first two octets...
now, he may go by Gays Suck2 on AIM....or as Godduquesne12....or Bpgoalie24....
User:Raccoon Fox • Talk 21:18, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Kudos for Komments!
Just wanted to let you know that your comment over on AfD StarCraft etc was an excellent one. I'm still very new to WP, but it seems like most discussions are either very obvious or very polarized. And many of the polarized ones seem to quickly fall to the level of a 1st grader: "Cruft...but Foo has these articles...NN...how can a TypeofFoo which sold Blee units be NN?...*sigh*" But your comment about chess and its larger impact to society in an excellent one. It is totally universal and (should) be easily understood by all. If anyone tips their head to the side and gives you the dumb puppy stare after being exposed to this comment, they can just go. Now. :) -- MrDolomite | Talk 22:32, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Userpage Protection
I don't know how to protect or semi-protect my user pages and sub-pages....and how to keep homophobic AOL/AIM users from contacting me... is there a way for me to make my userpages on the site unviewable to those not registered or logged in?
User:Raccoon Fox • Talk 16:26, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for July 24th
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 30 | 24 July 2006 | |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. --Michael Snow 04:42, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Argh, so it was. I apologise for that lack of caution on my part. Diagonalfish 15:32, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] my RfA
Cheers! - CheNuevara 17:30, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Mr Wiseacre
The annoying thing with wikipedia is that you meet from time to time a non-productive wisenheimer like Srose ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.154.2.63 (talk • contribs)
- Hi! First off, please don't think I'm watching your every move! I have your talk page on my watchlist and saw that an unregistered user made an edit and I was curious. A bit of advice; deleting a huge edit withough explanation is bad form. Also, your comments (Wikipedia is not a travel guide. Please do not add tourist information to articles, like you did to Bavaria.) were a bit harsh. I feel that the pictures are amazing and add a lot to the article. At the very least, it was a great effort on the part of the IP user to make a phenomenal addition to Wikipedia. It was definitely not tourist information. I'd advise restoring the pictures or explaining on the talk page how it violates policies. Having said that, any type of personal attack is inappropriate and totally undeserved on your part. hoopydinkConas tá tú? 02:07, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- I feel obliged to tell visitors to my user page that I included several smiling emoticons in my discussion with the anonymous user, 84.154.2.63, despite the omission of these from the above quotation, which I am quite sure was completely accidental. To hoopydink: I replied on your talk page. I merely want to clear the air slightly on my own. Srose (talk) 20:13, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Sure, I'd be happy to elaborate. My only issue was that the Bavaria edits were the user's first and only two edits. As such, being reverted without any real explanation other than his work being called unwanted due to its potentially touristy nature is discouraging. I'm aware that the message you left was probably a template or widely-used message, but sometimes a more human touch is needed. If you thought the edits inappropriate, I feel that a better explanation was necessary. The edits probably took a significant amount of time in terms of formatting and collecting the information. In addition, the edits could've been viewed with the benefit of the doubt as adding culture, history, and color to the article (rather than tourism information). Also, if you thought the pictures a bit much, you could've pointed the user to the Commons so others could enjoy his work. I've been quick to revert anonymous IP's before, as I'm sure most Wikipedians have at one time or another, so it's an easy "mistake" to make (if that's the label we're using). The mistake, however, could be potentially damaging to the new user and perhaps discourage him/her from editing again. The frustration of the new user is understandable but his insult to you on your talk page was not (which was what led me to look at his edits in the first place). "Harsh" was probably bad diction on my part, and I apologise. My intention was to convey that his edits were a bit overlooked or not treated the same as an edit by an established editor perhaps. To put it in perspective, would you have reverted the edits if Yanksox, Crzrussian, or another established editor made them? Again, being quick on the draw, so to speak is something everyone has done (myself included). The only reason I mentioned the incident to you is that it could've lost us an editor. Also, to clear things up, I'm not an administrator and seniority isn't really that big a deal, which is kind of the point I was trying to make. Each edit should be taken at face value, regardless of whether it is made by an administrator, a registered user, or an unregistered user using an IP. hoopydinkConas tá tú? 02:59, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Before I say anything else, let me say that I find it extremely offensive that you apparently do not think this is a mistake I made in good faith. (See your comment: "so it's an easy "mistake" to make".)
- To continue, I must disagree with the majority of your comments. First of all, the message I left was not a template. I never use templates (other than welcome templates, which I personalize) unless I absolutely must or they fit the situation to a letter. I feel they're impersonal, kind of like an answering machine, so I only use them in cases of obvious vandalism. Second of all, yes, I may have reverted such edits by an established user. They are beautiful pictures, but they do not add encyclopedic material to the article. They are only labeled as what they are, with no explanation. I am not very familiar with the Commons because as my computer has a low bandwith and little memory, I cannot view more than perhaps a dozen pictures per page. I also must assure you that I do not jump the gun on anonymous edits. If you were to look at my contributions, you'd see that most of my edits are not vandal fighting at all, but wikification, copyediting, and XfD discussions. My computer just is not fast enough for vandal fighting, with so many talented vandal fighters (and their more capable computers, although fortunately I'll have a new computer and Firefox by the end of August).
- I take pride in never biting the newcomers. That is why I rarely use a warning template; I personalize my messages and assume the very best intentions. About two months ago when I was a newcomer, I certainly felt bitten by a certain editor, and so make a point of being extremely kind. I also try to take notice of others' hard work by leaving messages on their talk pages, because it seems to me that it is very difficult to be noticed on Wikipedia unless you are in a certain clique or do something wrong. Srose (talk) 15:08, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Hi there! I apologise if you thought I assumed that you were not acting in good faith. I thought I made that apparent in that I mentioned that it's a very common thing to do (something I've done in the past). I guess we have different views on the whole thing (mine is apparently wrong); first, I thought you were just a bit quick to jump the gun as your message, as the pictures were very hard work and there was no explanation of reverting (except for dismissing the edits as a travel guide while citing WP:NOT on user's talk page), you used javascripts (where slipping is easy to do as reverting is quick and easy), the edit was a user's first, you mentioned that some of the pictures should indeed be kept on the Bavaria talk page, the editor hasn't edited since with that IP, etcetera, etcetera. As far as I can surmise, you feel that it was simply a straight-up case of a content issue. This is fine and I apologise for assuming otherwise. This being the case, any large removal of content is usually discussed on the talk page and travel guide information seems to be an inappropriate label (to me, at least). I was unaware that you were unfamiliar with the Commons and I apologise for assuming that (again!). For future reference, it's nice to point the user in that direction if you feel a picture or gallery is not needed. I apologise once more that you're a bit jaded with Wikipedia and feel that there's a cliquey nature. I agree that a lot of good work goes unnoticed, however, and we should all probably take some time out to recognise all the good works and the many hours of Wikipedians valuable time that are being volunteered by some great people (you're one of them, of course!) To be clear, my only intention to ensure that the IP editor did not leave Wikipedia because of the encounter (he apparently has left, which is too bad). It was never my intention nor my will to chastise you or somehow point out what I believed to be an error on your part; it was simply an issue of the new user. For what it's worth, I think you're a talented editor and if you think that you were bitten by me two months ago, I'll refer you to Yanksox, Crzrussian, or any other user you think has a handle on policy and they'll explain that there was no biting going on ;) I do hope that there is no animosity between us and I have a lot of respect for some of your favourite Wikipedians, so I hope that we too, could form a Wiki-relationship, as well! Cheers! hoopydinkConas tá tú? 01:39, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- I certainly concede your point that perhaps it was wrong of me to use JS. I am sorry that the user has apparently left, but I am not convinced that it was because of me. Many users edit once or twice and then leave. In any case, I'm planning on leaving a message on the user's page to apologize. As far as your biting goes...I still believe the userpage policy is a little vague, and when there are people with 20-odd subpages, I don't see what a small sub-talk page is going to hurt. For the record, Yanksox is my (very) long-time (real life) boyfriend and we've talked about it several times. Without disclosing it, I believe I know his opinion on the matter quite well. In any case, I have dropped the issue, but I would like to make the point that while you accuse me of scaring off a newcomer (by applying a policy), you have done the same thing with a different result: I remained at Wikipedia, largely because I'm not easily discouraged.
- All that aside, I would value your Wikifriendship very much as I consider you an experienced, knowledgeable, reasonable and intelligent person. In short, I apologize if you think my motives were less than honorable. I would appreciate your friendship greatly and hope that I can secure it. Srose (talk) 15:03, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- Hey again! Sure, I never meant to pigeonhole you and say that your actions were directly what caused the user to leave. You're right about users sometimes making a few edits and leaving and of course ultimately one is in complete control of one's actions (especially so on a web site). To make things clear, I felt that the WP:NOT policy you used to explain the revert didn't apply in the IP user's case (which is fine on on both our parts, as consensus is usually used to determine if policy applies and we were the only two debating it so of course there could be no consensus). In regards to the old user page, this is the policy and bulletpoints 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 applied (rather specifically so). Feel free to ask an administrator who can view the deleted page for another opinion if you want. If you still feel that Wikipedia policy permits the page, definitely feel free to recreate it if you want (I won't say or do anything and I will probably never notice it). Again, I assure you there was no biting on my part; feel free to check out the e-mail exchange between your boyfriend and I if he's willing and if he still has it in his box (that is, you won't be invading my privacy or anything like that). I think you'll see that my intentions were of a good sort and actually had nothing to do with you as a person. The issue was with a concern I had and what I thought was an obvious policy issue (there was a reason I asked you privately on your talk page rather than just throwing it up for MfD, ya know!). With that, I hope all of our previous issues are in the past and are really no big deal (that's how I feel). I truly appreciate your comments and willingness to be friends. It means a lot! To use an oft-said phrase of mine, cheers mate!
- Hi there! I apologise if you thought I assumed that you were not acting in good faith. I thought I made that apparent in that I mentioned that it's a very common thing to do (something I've done in the past). I guess we have different views on the whole thing (mine is apparently wrong); first, I thought you were just a bit quick to jump the gun as your message, as the pictures were very hard work and there was no explanation of reverting (except for dismissing the edits as a travel guide while citing WP:NOT on user's talk page), you used javascripts (where slipping is easy to do as reverting is quick and easy), the edit was a user's first, you mentioned that some of the pictures should indeed be kept on the Bavaria talk page, the editor hasn't edited since with that IP, etcetera, etcetera. As far as I can surmise, you feel that it was simply a straight-up case of a content issue. This is fine and I apologise for assuming otherwise. This being the case, any large removal of content is usually discussed on the talk page and travel guide information seems to be an inappropriate label (to me, at least). I was unaware that you were unfamiliar with the Commons and I apologise for assuming that (again!). For future reference, it's nice to point the user in that direction if you feel a picture or gallery is not needed. I apologise once more that you're a bit jaded with Wikipedia and feel that there's a cliquey nature. I agree that a lot of good work goes unnoticed, however, and we should all probably take some time out to recognise all the good works and the many hours of Wikipedians valuable time that are being volunteered by some great people (you're one of them, of course!) To be clear, my only intention to ensure that the IP editor did not leave Wikipedia because of the encounter (he apparently has left, which is too bad). It was never my intention nor my will to chastise you or somehow point out what I believed to be an error on your part; it was simply an issue of the new user. For what it's worth, I think you're a talented editor and if you think that you were bitten by me two months ago, I'll refer you to Yanksox, Crzrussian, or any other user you think has a handle on policy and they'll explain that there was no biting going on ;) I do hope that there is no animosity between us and I have a lot of respect for some of your favourite Wikipedians, so I hope that we too, could form a Wiki-relationship, as well! Cheers! hoopydinkConas tá tú? 01:39, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- I feel obliged to tell visitors to my user page that I included several smiling emoticons in my discussion with the anonymous user, 84.154.2.63, despite the omission of these from the above quotation, which I am quite sure was completely accidental. To hoopydink: I replied on your talk page. I merely want to clear the air slightly on my own. Srose (talk) 20:13, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- I decided that we shouldn't indent any further; we'll soon be writing in a column! :P Anyway, I reviewed the conversation quite some time ago, and I agree with some points, but disagree on some others. The policy simply isn't upheld on a whole and to be honest, I'm not sure I agree with it - there should be a limit on the number of subpages one should be able to have, although even that isn't quite fair, because some users simply have extremely lengthy userpages. Additionally, (I hope this isn't offensive!) I certainly know Yanksox better than anyone here (25 months will do that to you) and have discussed the matter with him at further length than anyone else. Anyway, as I say, I have dropped the matter entirely for several reasons (among them that visits have recently become more frequent than once weekly and that I must admit that I hope to one day be an admin myself) and merely brought it up to make an example.
- On an unrelated matter, if I may ask, what precisely is a "wiseacre"? I know what the anonymous user's second "w" word means, but I thought wiseacre was made up.
- I do hope that we can put all of this behind us, because you certainly seem like the type of friend I'd be honored to have. Srose (talk) 16:29, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- Ah, definitely a good call on the indent! :) Also, thank you so much for the smile (it's my first Wiki-smile)! I still feel that I was correct discussing that policy with you, but I completely respect and admire your relationship, so it goes without saying that whatever you two have discussed and decided upon is both private and cool with me with whatever you want to do. In as far as your discussions go, I hope you understand what my intentions were. I understand you bringing up the example and respect your differing opinion, as it was well thought out and presented with class. I'm glad this is all behind us and we can continue to help make Wikipedia a better place and become friends. Um, about the wiseacre thing, it wasn't my header, so I can't say for sure, however as far as I know it's a phrase that old people throw about when referring to the younger set. It's actually rather funny as it's such a dated phrase. Hrm, anyways, just a website, do what you want, cool with me, glad we're friends, good stuff! hoopydinkConas tá tú? 17:09, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Vandaliser Won't Quit Making Vandal Edits
Currently on the mama's family page, I have made an edit that keeps getting erased by DtownG. He keeps referring to mama as proactive. This is a word that doesn't describe Mama whatsoever. I have watched all 135 episodes umpteen times and I know this. I even tried to discuss this matter very civilly with him and argue my points, and after few responses he just decided he was going to continually keep changing it to proactive just to avoid being deferential. This is a battle to him, not an attempt to use the right word. Could you please look at our discussion on the talk page of mama's family and see what I have said to argue my points. After he saw this and saw that it made sense, he said oh well, I will just keep putting my word down regardless if it makes sense. That is what his behavior is like.
Maybe I won't need your help after all. He seems to be willing to talk this out now
Yea, srose, I take that back. we're going to have a problem with this fellow. He is being unreasonable and I need your help. thank you
Hello, Srose! This is a real complimentary for me to be noticed cince i saw the messages here change so often!
I understood you are interested in Estonia and estonians!!! it is a real complimentary for us, estonians! i also started wondering... since you have noticed me in english wiki for estonian language (sorry about my bad english) then excactly in which part you would like to help me: a) in teaching estonian or b) in writing articles about estonians? it just left me wondering. please be so kind and answer in my "User talk" because i'm a little drunk right now and i know my english is even worse right now and.... oh. bla, bla, bla... Avjoska 20:58, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for July 31st
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 31 | 31 July 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:27, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Andres
I know User:Andres is a busy man but i think you could ask him to join project:Estonia. he is a very good admin in Estonian Wiki. Avjoska 17:28, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikiproject Estonia
Andres has informed everyone in estonian wiki about this project in this community portal. so we can wait for a big help! :) Avjoska 06:09, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re:Ooops!
Hi, no problem. That happens to everyone who reverts vandalism, especially on articles that get 30 edits in 20 minutes for some reason. - Bobet 13:03, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] That was cool!
Wow, what a coincidence! Earlier I voted for Yanksox for admin, and you being his significant other are editing Phaedriel’s nomination same time I am. That was cool. Please say hello to Yanksox for me. I know he must be very busy. Cheers! JungleCat talk/contrib 17:18, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Confusion
I was out painting my house for a couple of hours, I'm leaving for work right now. I'll call you when I get home. Yanksox 15:47, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for August 7th
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 32 | 7 August 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:06, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for August 7th
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 32 | 7 August 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:06, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome to EA!
Welcome to Esperanza Srose! Hope you enjoy your time with Us! Æon Insane Ward 20:07, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Article editing
What articles are you currently editing? I'll help you on some if you help me out on some!! Thanks for the message on my talk page!
TheM62Manchester has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
--TheM62Manchester 21:05, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks!
Thanks for the message.... want to help me get an article to featured status?? You find an article, let me know and we can work on it! --TheM62Manchester 21:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Estonia
Sure, I'll join! Oh, and as for the 'quick on my keyboard' comment; well, I'm a computer technician by trade! thanks for the message! --TheM62Manchester 21:24, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for your thoughtful comments
I'm temporarily emerging from wikibreak to comment on your post, which was not only encouraging but also constructive. It's something I can mull over while I'm away, and will help me to learn from this incident and become a better editor. Much appreciated. Itsmejudith 22:19, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] A smile for you...
Michael has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
Michael 04:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, thanks for the cookies! Michael 20:26, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] I love a good semisquabble
Did he give you the diamond I gave him for ya? - CrazyRussian talk/email 00:38, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Smile!
Thank you very much for the smile you left on my talk page it - it was really refreshing to be some warmly thanked for such a small thing. :) Thanks again, and I hope you see you around more in the future. Wikipedia can always benefit from the presence of more users like you. RandyWang (chat me up/fix me up) 01:56, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Well, thanks again for the smile - it really made my day, especially since I'd just completed my school maths exam by the time I was able to see it. ;) Happy editing in the future, and I look forward to seeing you around in the future! Maybe I'll even smile back. :P RandyWang (chat me up/fix me up) 02:45, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for support
Thanks for clearing up my opinion on the Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:The "9/11 Truth Movement" WikiProject, I couldn't put it well into words to back myself up. Canadian-Bacon 17:34, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Smile!
Æon Insane Ward has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
Æon Insane Ward 20:10, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you
I appreciate it :) --Striver 20:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Jack the Ripper
You asked: Hi... just wondering, what was so POV about what the previous editors had placed in the article? It's a sourced statement... Srose (talk) 00:25, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
What sourced statement? I did not remove a sourced statement. The previous editor claims that Jack the Ripper's identity has not been determined. This is just his opinion. There are any number of people who think his identity has been determined (of course they don;t agree on what that identity is), and one of them may actually be right. Saying that it has not been determined is saying that they are all wrong, which violates the WP:NPOV policy. This has been thoroughly explained on the talk page of the article in question. 172.144.107.206 00:29, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Furthermore, if you do not understand an edit, you shouldn't just revert it instantly... That's what talk page discussion is for. 172.144.107.206 00:33, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- I believe the statement implies that since one suspect has not been agreed upon, the killer has not been identified and probably never will be. The statement does not mean that no killer has ever been identified. I believe that your advice can also apply to you: If you don't agree with something, discuss it on the talk page. Perhaps the two statements can be merged, but neither should be completely removed wihtout a good reason. Please also make sure to be civil in your edit summaries (for example, don't call other editors names). Additionally, I did not "immediately revert". I read the article and its accompanying talk page before making a change. Happy editing! Srose (talk) 12:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
Hi,
Thank you for the welcome message!
I am thinking of a contribution on the description of a fusion based nuclear reactor. Any suggestions you would have would be greatly appreciated.
ClaudeSB 18:25, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] mfd
Srose, may i ask why previous mfd are relevant? I have learnt from then and the misstakes that existed in that project does not exist in this one. Am i baned from making projects since i did bad projects before? Why not judge this project on its own merit and see if i have learnt from previous misstakes? --Striver 22:52, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your welcome message
{{Welcomesrose}} is nice, but it wasn't appropriate for template-space as-was, being customized for you. I changed it to include a user variable; now, type:
{{subst:Welcomesrose|me=Srose}}
You also might want to move it to a less personal name (e.g., Template:Welcomecookie) and change it to use {{<includeonly>SUBST:</includeonly>PAGENAME}} instead of {{PAGENAME}}. Thanks! Λυδαcιτγ 00:06, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- You're welcome! The one change I didn't make is to the {{PAGENAME}} variable. Using this variable can produce unwanted results:
- The welcomed user will see the {{PAGENAME}} code if he clicks "edit this page"
- If the welcome is archived, the {{PAGENAME}} variable won't make sense, since it will change to reflect the name of the archived page.
- For these reasons, you should consider substituting the {{PAGENAME}}, by using {{<includeonly>SUBST:</includeonly>PAGENAME}} instead of {{PAGENAME}}. If you do this, the following series of events will occur when you substitute the template onto someone's talk page:
- {{PAGENAME}} finds the name of the user (e.g., "Jimbo Wales"). See m:Help:Magic words for more info. However, it does not make a permanent copy of this finding - it stays as a variable. If you look at the source code of the page at this point, you would see {{PAGENAME}}, not Jimbo Wales.
- To fix this, SUBST: takes the found username, and converts it from a variable into normal text. See Wikipedia:Template substitution for how this works. Now, the source code shows Jimbo Wales.
- However, the problem is that SUBST: doesn't know that you only want it to run when you put it on a talk page. In fact, it would run as soon as you made the change to the template, and result in something like Template:Welcome on the template itself. Then the {{PAGENAME}} variable would be gone, and the template wouldn't work right. To fix this, put <includeonly> and </includeonly> around the SUBST:. Now, the SUBST: runs only when you use it on a different page - the user's talk page. Caution: this only works for substituted templates! For more info about <includeonly>, see Wikipedia:Variable#Substitution.
- If you want to make this change to your templates but are confused by this complicated explanation I'd be happy to do it; just contact me at my talk page. Also, you can take a look at {{User:Audacity/Welcome}} or {{User:GeorgeMoney/welcome}} for examples. Thanks, Λυδαcιτγ 16:34, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi Srose, Thnx for your message! I'm a fully newbie in Wikipedia [and in English]. Therefore, I will be more active on the Dutch-Wikipedia pages. But also a bit on the Englishversion! So sorry if I make mistakes. Greetings, Raween
[edit] Thanks!
Oh, ta very much for all the comments and suggestions. I am trying *sigh* to reduce my activity here during the next week or so, but after that I'll be back and will be jumping into things with a vengeance. And then there'll be no stopping me... :) Thanks for the nice smile too, by the way. I brought cupcakes. Hope to see you around, — riana_dzasta • t • c • e • ER • 23:43, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yep, it's night, which is why I'm feeling slightly less guilty about editing right now :) Damn, that sounds like a lot of work. I hope you don't have a hard time with it all! Good to hear from you again. Cheers, — riana_dzasta • t • c • e • ER • 13:15, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RfA thanks
 |
Thanks so much for voting, Srose!
Thanks so much for your support vote on my request for adminship! With a final vote count of (82/5/0), it succeeded, and I'm now an administrator! I am thrilled with the overwhelming positive support from the community, and sincerely thank you once again for taking your time to voice your opinion. Feel free to contact me with any comments/suggestions in the future!—Mets501 (talk) 03:52, 13 August 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] Brian Dennehy
Right. Yes, it's a mix-up. Well, I'll just cut and paste myself out of here. Thanks for the response. Fwend 23:21, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikispaces
Did you have any thoughts on my response to your comments about flagging other wiki hosting service pages for deletion? I think it would be pretty shady for me to do it but it's obviously frustrating if the Wikispaces entry is going to be removed and others aren't. Adamfrey 21:50, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks. Everyone on this list is probably a good start:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_wiki_farms
Adamfrey 19:16, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Why would you say Wetpaint qualifies for deletion but the others don't? Adamfrey 18:00, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
First, those four criteria (first, unique, membership numbers, language) are not mentioned in WP:WEB. Second, Wikispaces qualifies under at least a couple of those criteria certainly more than several of the others do. We have several unique characteristics and we're certainly of a size to be notable.
Seems to me there are two real objections to the Wikispaces entry.
1) It's "advertising". That's valid to an extent. I think the appropriate response is to rewrite the entry so that it's informative rather than advertising.
2) It's not "notable". We're clearly as notable or more than most of those other entries. It's going to take a long time for me to convince anyone of that in this forum but it's true. It's certainly reasonable that plenty of people haven't heard of us but that doesn't mean we're not notable in the eyes of many people.
Thoughts?
Adamfrey 00:15, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Sounds good. Here are a few "non-trivial" references to Wikispaces itself:
http://www.developerpipeline.com/blog/archives/2005/10/wikis_versus_bl.html
http://news.com.com/How+wikis+are+changing+our+view+of+the+world/2009-1025_3-5944453.html
http://personalweb.about.com/od/wikihostingandsoftware/a/511wiki.htm
http://www.nyteknik.se/art/44655 (In swedish but it's basically a review of wiki hosting services)
http://www.wamu.org/programs/kn/06/02/21.php#10383
http://www.techsoup.org/learningcenter/webbuilding/page4563.cfm?CFID=20736346&CFTOKEN=75527754
Thanks, Adam
[edit] Thanks!
...for the really nice message, support, and cake. Something about the texture is just...amazing. It's making me ridiculously hungry. Coincidentally, I've been meaning to comment in your editor review, but I'm holding off on participating in any ER/RfA/XfD type situations until my own RfA is complete. So yeah, thanks so much! Have a great evening, alphaChimp laudare 02:37, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hi .. i have some question ,
''''hi sir how are u..
sir i want to know sth about generator construction.
and i am studying about electrition and i want some help from u and i want some notes of electrical.''''
- Hi there!! I'm actually a girl, but don't worry about that - it's hard to tell online! Hmmm...I'm not too knowledgable about electricity. Maybe if you went to the following articles, they would help:
Also see the Reference Desk, where someone who knows more may be able to assist you. Srose (talk) 16:23, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] August Esperanza Newsletter
|
|
|
[edit] Your edit count
Heya, I've updated your edit count using Flcelloguy's tool, since you asked so nicely. :) You might be able to do it yourself, though, using something like Interiot's Tool 2 - it uses Javascript, so it should run just fine in your web browser. Unfortunately, it can be very slow: my 1.33Ghz G4 laptop takes around ten seconds to run through ~2700 edits, so if your computer is much slower than that, it might not be feasible at all. RandyWang (chat me up/fix me up) 23:18, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Essjay's tool is pretty nifty. Yanksox 23:21, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- I'll second that: I tried it for the first time ever, just then, and it's much faster than Interiot's Tool 2. It also looks prettier. :) RandyWang (chat me up/fix me up) 23:25, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Phew! Your machine sounds like a monster. I'd offer you an iMac (of which I have more than a few just lying around - the Australian National University sold hundreds off a while ago), but the postage might be just a tad on the expensive side. ;) RandyWang (chat me up/fix me up) 02:03, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
Hi thank you for the star :) --Ali doostzadeh 01:50, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Check your e-mail
Please? I have a few minutes... Yanksox 02:20, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for August 14th
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 33 | 14 August 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:19, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Shark copyediting
Hi, If you copyedit (which is a good thing, thanks) any more of the shark articles can you leave the between the values and units on the measurements as this prevents linebreaks between them. Thanks Yomanganitalk 19:59, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re. November 28
Sorry about that, it's VandalProof I use, and so it was automatic! --Alex talk here 23:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks!
Oh, ta very much for all the comments and suggestions. I am trying *sigh* to reduce my activity here during the next week or so, but after that I'll be back and will be jumping into things with a vengeance. And then there'll be no stopping me... :) Thanks for the nice smile too, by the way. I brought cupcakes. Hope to see you around, — riana_dzasta • t • c • e • ER • 23:43, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yep, it's night, which is why I'm feeling slightly less guilty about editing right now :) Damn, that sounds like a lot of work. I hope you don't have a hard time with it all! Good to hear from you again. Cheers, — riana_dzasta • t • c • e • ER • 13:15, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RfA thanks
|
Thanks so much for voting, Srose!
Thanks so much for your support vote on my request for adminship! With a final vote count of (82/5/0), it succeeded, and I'm now an administrator! I am thrilled with the overwhelming positive support from the community, and sincerely thank you once again for taking your time to voice your opinion. Feel free to contact me with any comments/suggestions in the future!—Mets501 (talk) 03:52, 13 August 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] Brian Dennehy
Right. Yes, it's a mix-up. Well, I'll just cut and paste myself out of here. Thanks for the response. Fwend 23:21, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikispaces
Did you have any thoughts on my response to your comments about flagging other wiki hosting service pages for deletion? I think it would be pretty shady for me to do it but it's obviously frustrating if the Wikispaces entry is going to be removed and others aren't. Adamfrey 21:50, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks. Everyone on this list is probably a good start:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_wiki_farms
Adamfrey 19:16, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Why would you say Wetpaint qualifies for deletion but the others don't? Adamfrey 18:00, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
First, those four criteria (first, unique, membership numbers, language) are not mentioned in WP:WEB. Second, Wikispaces qualifies under at least a couple of those criteria certainly more than several of the others do. We have several unique characteristics and we're certainly of a size to be notable.
Seems to me there are two real objections to the Wikispaces entry.
1) It's "advertising". That's valid to an extent. I think the appropriate response is to rewrite the entry so that it's informative rather than advertising.
2) It's not "notable". We're clearly as notable or more than most of those other entries. It's going to take a long time for me to convince anyone of that in this forum but it's true. It's certainly reasonable that plenty of people haven't heard of us but that doesn't mean we're not notable in the eyes of many people.
Thoughts?
Adamfrey 00:15, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Sounds good. Here are a few "non-trivial" references to Wikispaces itself:
http://www.developerpipeline.com/blog/archives/2005/10/wikis_versus_bl.html
http://news.com.com/How+wikis+are+changing+our+view+of+the+world/2009-1025_3-5944453.html
http://personalweb.about.com/od/wikihostingandsoftware/a/511wiki.htm
http://www.nyteknik.se/art/44655 (In swedish but it's basically a review of wiki hosting services)
http://www.wamu.org/programs/kn/06/02/21.php#10383
http://www.techsoup.org/learningcenter/webbuilding/page4563.cfm?CFID=20736346&CFTOKEN=75527754
Thanks, Adam
[edit] Thanks!
...for the really nice message, support, and cake. Something about the texture is just...amazing. It's making me ridiculously hungry. Coincidentally, I've been meaning to comment in your editor review, but I'm holding off on participating in any ER/RfA/XfD type situations until my own RfA is complete. So yeah, thanks so much! Have a great evening, alphaChimp laudare 02:37, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hi .. i have some question ,
''''hi sir how are u..
sir i want to know sth about generator construction.
and i am studying about electrition and i want some help from u and i want some notes of electrical.''''
- Hi there!! I'm actually a girl, but don't worry about that - it's hard to tell online! Hmmm...I'm not too knowledgable about electricity. Maybe if you went to the following articles, they would help:
Also see the Reference Desk, where someone who knows more may be able to assist you. Srose (talk) 16:23, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] August Esperanza Newsletter
|
|
|
[edit] Your edit count
Heya, I've updated your edit count using Flcelloguy's tool, since you asked so nicely. :) You might be able to do it yourself, though, using something like Interiot's Tool 2 - it uses Javascript, so it should run just fine in your web browser. Unfortunately, it can be very slow: my 1.33Ghz G4 laptop takes around ten seconds to run through ~2700 edits, so if your computer is much slower than that, it might not be feasible at all. RandyWang (chat me up/fix me up) 23:18, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Essjay's tool is pretty nifty. Yanksox 23:21, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- I'll second that: I tried it for the first time ever, just then, and it's much faster than Interiot's Tool 2. It also looks prettier. :) RandyWang (chat me up/fix me up) 23:25, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Phew! Your machine sounds like a monster. I'd offer you an iMac (of which I have more than a few just lying around - the Australian National University sold hundreds off a while ago), but the postage might be just a tad on the expensive side. ;) RandyWang (chat me up/fix me up) 02:03, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
Hi thank you for the star :) --Ali doostzadeh 01:50, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Check your e-mail
Please? I have a few minutes... Yanksox 02:20, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for August 14th
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 33 | 14 August 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:19, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Shark copyediting
Hi, If you copyedit (which is a good thing, thanks) any more of the shark articles can you leave the between the values and units on the measurements as this prevents linebreaks between them. Thanks Yomanganitalk 19:59, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re. November 28
Sorry about that, it's VandalProof I use, and so it was automatic! --Alex talk here 23:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Helllo!
Howdy! I see you've been quite active lately, how is the project coming out?
- Yanksox 22:07, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] thanks!
I sure appreciate your comment on Talk:Benier_Koranache; I was really encouraged by your words. --Grahamtalk/mail/e 20:43, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- Just wanted to commend you on the conversation in Talk:Benier_Koranache. It's an outstanding example of how to handle difficult interactions. Waitak 00:35, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RfA and not needing tools
Srose, let me begin by saying I'm not here to dispute your weak oppose of Stevie's RFA. I was curious, however, about a position I see frequently. RFA participants often say that someone shouldn't be made an admin b/c they don't need the tools, even though they won't abuse them, that all of the tasks they are working on can be accomplished without the bit. I've never understood it, though I may well have missed something. What's the rationale behind it? You can reply here. Thanks.--Kchase T 19:07, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Essentially, my rationale is that the community doesn't need to hand out tools to folks who are high quality contributors (much like Stevie - please see my excessively lengthy message on his talk page) when others who actually do admin-like jobs would like them and be more deserving of them. We already have too many admins that do not regularly use the tools. Adminship isn't an elevated status. Admins are merely a group of users who do extremely behind-the-scenes work: closing XfDs (see WP:AfD and its backlog - if it still has one; it changes by the hour), warning and blocking vandals (Wikipedia:Blocking policy), reverting vandalism (administrators have a tool to revert that is much faster than any of those available to non-admins), answering newcomers' questions, deleting non-controversial pages (see WP:CSD), protecting pages that are receiving high amounts of vandalism (like Elephant, after that infamous Colbert Report), and negotiating compromises for users in conflicts. As Stevie rarely does some of these things (and never does the rest), I just don't think he needs the mop and flamethrower. Adminship isn't a reward for particularly good editors: it's an added list of duties for those who have experience in admin areas (XfD, WP:3O, WP:MEDCAB, vandalism) and are trusted enough by the community to have the ability to block users, delete articles, close XfDs and protect articles. Srose (talk) 19:23, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- There's also JS-assisted non-admin rollback. I've been using it for a while now. Anyway, I should have been more specific, but I think it's just because we disagree. To me, it seems like an inefficient use of community time to evaluate a candidate and then not give them the tools because they will rarely use them, even though they will not abuse them. Perhaps the reason for such voting is more global: to discourage RFAs from good editors who don't need the tools and thereby encourage RFAs from folks who are more keen to help with our backlogs?--Kchase T 20:00, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- That last sentence is exactly it, boiled down to a drop. I guess I went on a bit long, huh? Well, in any case, I imagine Stevie's RfA will succeed, just looking at the pattern thus far, and I wish him all the best of luck. I would like to see more candidates who are intent on helping behind the scenes with backlogs, etc., because essentially, that's the entire difference between an admin and a regular, registered user. Srose (talk) 20:05, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, I think Stevie's going to get the flamethrower. Thanks for the dialogue, Srose.--Kchase T 20:11, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Ack, I was just about to add a PS, and it appears we edit-conflicted. Anyway, the PS was: I use JS rollbacks too, but the admin version compresses several of the steps, so it's faster and easier. Nice chatting with you, too. If you ever need anything, my door's open! :) Srose (talk) 20:13, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, I think Stevie's going to get the flamethrower. Thanks for the dialogue, Srose.--Kchase T 20:11, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- That last sentence is exactly it, boiled down to a drop. I guess I went on a bit long, huh? Well, in any case, I imagine Stevie's RfA will succeed, just looking at the pattern thus far, and I wish him all the best of luck. I would like to see more candidates who are intent on helping behind the scenes with backlogs, etc., because essentially, that's the entire difference between an admin and a regular, registered user. Srose (talk) 20:05, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- There's also JS-assisted non-admin rollback. I've been using it for a while now. Anyway, I should have been more specific, but I think it's just because we disagree. To me, it seems like an inefficient use of community time to evaluate a candidate and then not give them the tools because they will rarely use them, even though they will not abuse them. Perhaps the reason for such voting is more global: to discourage RFAs from good editors who don't need the tools and thereby encourage RFAs from folks who are more keen to help with our backlogs?--Kchase T 20:00, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Yay!
Thanks for the brownies. Even though I'm on a "diet", I find that eating a picture of brownies on my computer screen doesn't add too many calories. :) Let me know if I can do any admin-ish thing for you! --Aguerriero (talk) 19:12, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks very much
Thank you very much for the comment as well as the explanation on the Calvary Church article. I am amazed at how quickly things get done on wikipedia! One question, does wikipedia have any kind of spell check feature (I know that I am going to need it). Thebigaster 22:13, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
