User talk:Sriram sh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello Sriram sh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, some of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a great page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Big Smooth 14:55, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Hypocrisy. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Shadowlynk 18:31, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Srikanth

Hi, may I ask what you are doing nominating Srikanth (actor) for speedy deletion? There is no way in which the text currently in that article could be characterized as "patent nonsense", and no way is the CSD G1 criterion met. If you think the article has problems, then please edit the article. Srikanth is clearly a notable actor, he has been in major films. --- Deville (Talk) 19:53, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] STOP

Can you refrain from editing the Srikanth article. You seem to be constantly vandalizing it. STOP IT Thamizhan 12:48, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi Thamizhan..I know that I have been making modifications in the aforesaid article but please note that the language and the content is beyond redemption. I tried, with good intent, to correct some of the language and style adopted but, at the current state, the article is beyond repair. Please suggest constructive means to set-right the article rather than trying to suggest that I am a mere vandal which I am not, however hard you may drive home the point.Sriram sh 16:26, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

You seem to be blanking. That is considered vandalism. Could you please explain what you were doing? -- Ganeshk (talk) 20:14, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi Ganesh, I am blanking the article not because I got a grudge against your idol. But please take a moment to bring the article to its proper from rather than crusading against me. I think you can devote your energies that way rather than proving a point to me. Am I clear?Sriram sh 10:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] March 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Sachin Tendulkar. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gnanapiti 06:33, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Tendulkar

Hi, Can you get that article from Wisden as a reference? We can add that view too. This here tells a different story about Tendulkar's last world cupGnanapiti 01:37, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Spam in Apligraf(R)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Apligraf(R), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Apligraf(R) is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Apligraf(R), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:55, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Irrelevant point

Hi, I am kinda stumped to know that my article is considered 'blatant advertising' when all I did was post information which I thought would be interesting and revealing to people interested in the field of regenerative medicine. And hey, to set the matter straight I am, in no way affiliated to this organization alluded to. As for the quality of the article, well the debate could go on forever. I can only plead guilty on that count, however I would be most happy if someone could offer constructive criticism rather than 'destroying' the article per se. Thanks. Sriram sh 16:00, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Creationwiki

A tag has been placed on Creationwiki, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Creationwiki. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. DarkSaber2k 10:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Genetic anthropology

Genetic anthropology, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Genetic anthropology satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genetic anthropology and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Genetic anthropology during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Cruftbane 12:24, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
Your continued joking at George W. Bush is disruptive and considered vandalism. You will be blocked from editing Wikipedia if you continue. richi 22:08, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to George W. Bush. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. richi 12:54, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Shahrukh Khan, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. richi 11:42, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content of marginal relevance (unnecessary trivia) to articles, as you did to India, is not considered productive. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. richi 11:43, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are unusual or difficult to understand in articles, as you did to gPhone. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Thank you. Please don't change capitalization so as to make the article's style inconsistent. Your edits also broke one or more ref URLs ... richi 11:49, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm trying very hard to educate you about the types of content that are unacceptable in Wikipedia. Please take a look at the links above, to policies and other articles that should help clarify. However, if you continue to behave in a way that this community sees as unacceptable, you risk being blocked ... richi 12:33, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Kendle

A tag has been placed on Kendle, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion G12.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.richi 12:37, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Kendle, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. As a copyright violation, Kendle appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Kendle has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Kendle and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Kendle with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Kendle.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia.

I think I already answered your question above, particularly the final sentence ... richi 19:12, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] SMO

Useful addition to the disamiguation page; thanks for your contribution. A couple of notes:

Please try to use the same styles as in the other bullets.
A disambiguation page should link to articles that describe the thing more fully. You could therefore start an article called Site management organization.

... richi 19:23, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of ICON Plc. (company)

A tag has been placed on ICON Plc. (company), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A7.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. richi 23:12, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Please stop. If you continue to use ~~disruptive or hard to read~~ inconsistent formatting, as you did to Spock (disambiguation), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. richi 23:18, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

In reply to your questions:

No, that's not the only edit you made, if it were, there'd be no problem. You also changed the punctuation so that it was inconsistent with all the other bullets. See diff ... richi 11:34, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
If you don't understand the deletion rationale, please review the links in the notice I posted to your talk page. If it's still not clear, feel free to let me know which part you don't understand and I'll be happy to advise ... richi 11:38, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Please take care: your edit to Halo broke a wikilink ... richi 20:04, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive or hard to read formatting, as you did to Ctep, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. When editing dab pages, please use consistent formatting. Also, CTEP is not the correct acronym for Cholesteryl ester transfer protein. And you spelled cholesteryl ester wrong ... richi 13:14, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jesus The Man

In reply to your question, please see Wikipedia:Your first article ... richi 00:14, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jesus the Man (book)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jesus the Man (book), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Phgao 06:40, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

I've edited this quite a bit. I couldn't find anything about a "Peshto Technique", but I did find another WP article that mentions a Pesher Technique. Please take care not to introduce errors into articles. See this diff ... richi 12:07, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Leonardo da Vinci

I observed that you were trying to add some info to the Leonardo article, but it didn't work, so you deleted it. Wise move! sometimes things just stuff up if you don't format a reference quite right!

About the information:-

Every day, almost, new papers are written about Leonardo coming up with amazing ideas, like the notion that there is music encoded in the "Last Supper". Thousands and thousands of words have been written about that painting alone. There simply isn't room for every new idea within that article. The article is already much longer than is recommended and it still doesn't discuss all the important paintings, and doesn't talk about Leonardo's architectural designs at all.

So there is simply no room for an unproven theory of that nature within that brief discussion of the painting, which, you will notice, doesn't even name the disciples, because it isn't an in depth study.

So several other pages have been set up:

...and a collection of monographs on the individual works. Perhaps the info could be added to the page on the painting itself. If you go back to the Leonardo page, you will find the right link.

Happy editting!

Amandajm 11:02, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re musical notation in painting

My comment would be that it is merely someone's theory. It shows a great deal of cleverness in the person who conceived the idea, but doesn't teach us anything about Leornardo, unless it can be proven to have been his intention.

Despite the fact that Leonardo wrote backwards (he was left-handed so it was physically easier to manage a pen in that way) he did not normally do things in an obscure manner. The notion of hidden and encoded messages is a very Dan-Brownish sort of idea. The "Last Supper" is not about hidden meanings. It is about telling us the viewer a narrative as if we were watching actors on a stage. Leonardo spent his life making obscure things clear, rather than the other way around.

Amandajm 11:30, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Christ

Once again, I must warn you to please take care not to introduce errors. See this edit ... richi 17:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Burning Bush

In a recent edit to the page Burning Bush, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. If you have any queries about all this, just ask anyone on Wikipedia and they will help you. Thank you. richi (talk) 01:06, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from all of Wikipedia. richi (talk) 01:12, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Formatting errors can be fixed, and we all have to learn, often from our mistakes, but it's not acceptable to post spam links on Wikipedia. In this case, you linked to a site run by the Ion Channel Media Group. Take a look at my edits to see a much better link to the paper. Not only is this unpolluted by advertising, but it is the full text, not just an abstract. Please also take note of the English spelling policy.

I'm sorry you find the warning templates confrontational. I didn't write them. By my count, you've received more than 15 warnings of various types over the past year. Editors have been indefinitely banned for less ... richi (talk) 12:54, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your article, ‎Tubectomy

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Tommosimmo (talk) 04:19, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Further to the above: is Tubectomy the same procedure (or set of procedures) as Tubal ligation? If so, it would seem sensible to merge the former to the latter, which has references. --Tom Tresser (talk) 12:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)