User talk:SriMesh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  • Please add comments to the bottom of this Current talk page.
  • This talk page has archival pages for its history as it was getting too long.
  • Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

View User Page

Contents

[edit] Thanks

Gifting you a Ganesha for good luck.
Gifting you a Ganesha for good luck.

For Barnstar and GA review. I would like have your comments about Matrikas. I am currently expanding the article. I am also GA reviewing an article for the first time. I will contact you if i need help in the review.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 04:55, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

You need not peek in now. I will leave a note on your talk after the expansion of Matrikas.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 05:05, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] wikiquote:British Columbia

Sri, I appreciate the work you have been doing, but there is still a lot of concern (not just from me) about the British Columbia page. The main concern is that most of the quotes on the page seem to have nothing to do with British Columbia, or to not be particularly about British Columbia. Are you under the impression that any notable quote by a notable British Columbian belongs on this page? If so, that's not the way things work at Wikiquote. I understand that you have a portal that you would like to maintain, and are trying to put the quotations in Wikiquote, which is fine and good, but the way to do it would be to set up separate pages from separate topics, and then cross-reference them from your portal. For instance, you could certainly have a page on Emily Carr, who is notable and whose quotes are notable. You could probably have a page about British Columbia too, but you would need to keep to topic on it (that is, only notable quotes clearly about British Columbia.

Going through the quotes on the page, here are my comments:

  • Cedars are terribly sensitive...
    • Appears to be about cedars, which grow everywhere
  • Come to the edge of the barn...
    • Not apparently about BC.
  • Downstream ever further...
    • If I had to guess, I'd say this is about salmon. I can see where it might be about BC, but I'd need some context.
  • It is wonderful to feel the grandness of Canada...
    • Seems to be about Canada. Yes, I know she lived in BC, but if she meant BC why did she say Canada? Much of what she says is true about other parts of Canada.
  • Life's an awfully lonesome affair.
    • This is about life. I don't see the connection to BC
  • Most of the Games..
    • First, this is about the games, not about BC (even though the games will be there). Second, it's not a very interesting quote from a quotability standpoint -- it's just marketing propaganda.
  • owls in the beardusky woods
    • About owls? We have them too.
  • Stand with Baillie-Grohman in 1882...
    • I don't know where most of those places are, but I'm prepared to believe this one is about BC.
  • The flavour is its own reward...
    • Have no idea why this is about BC.
  • There is something bigger than fact...
    • Again, if she's talking about BC we need some context.
  • You always feel when you look it straight...
    • Isn't this about art?
  • The coast of British Columbia was one of the three chief centers of aboriginal America.
    • About BC, but of no interest as a quote. It's just a fact.

If some of these (other than the one i mention) are really about BC, you need to explain why. The standard wikiquote format, which you haven't used, would be useful here. Here's an example:

  • The hush of the forest in the still of the mountains.
    • explaining what he finds unique about British Columbia
    • John Doe, My Life, Erehwon Publishers, 2007

But the source had better bear out the fact that the person really is talking about some experience or quality unique to BC, not just an impression he happened to have just because he happened to be in BC or because he was born there. Do you understand what I mean? --ubiquity (talk) 15:53, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your copyedit request

On April 12, 2007, you made a request to the League of Copyeditors for a copyedit on Geography of Saskatchewan. Due to a heavy backlog and a shortage of copyeditors, we have been unable to act on your request in a timely manner, for which we aplogize. Since your request, this article has been subject to significant editing, and may no longer be a good candidate for copyediting by the League. If you still wish the League to copyedit this article, please review this article against our new criteria and follow the instructions on the Requests page. This will include your request in our new system, where it should receive more prompt attention. SlackerMom (talk) 17:33, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your copyedit request

On 11 August 2007, you made a request to the League of Copyeditors for a copyedit on Agriculture in Canada. Because of a heavy backlog and a shortage of copyeditors, we have been unable to act on your request in a timely manner, for which we aplogize. Since your request, this article has been subject to significant editing and may no longer be a good candidate for copyediting by the League. If you still wish the League to copyedit this article, please review this article against our new criteria and follow the instructions on the Requests page. This will include your request in our new system, where it should receive more prompt attention. Finetooth (talk) 18:41, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] In Ayyavazhi article

Thanks for the good works. And the citations, 108 and 109 were moved to another URL and now I've placed the current URL to the article. And the page cited in 'citation 75' was missing and I don't find it through search engines. So I removed it from the article. Please refer to the article and it's talk page. Once again thanks very much for your good suggestions and works. - PAUL RAJ 20:27, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

User:SriMesh, Thanks very much, beyond words for all your kind helps and works. - PAUL RAJ 20:58, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

have you or haven't you passed the article as WP:GAC says it is still on hold.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 05:50, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I have removed the article from GAC list.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 04:47, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sask Quotes

Hi SriMesh, how are you? It was nice to hear from you. I checked out the Saskatchewan page. Looks good. I have started a discussion on its Talk page. Talk to you soon! Moisejp (talk) 02:30, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi SriMesh, how are you doing? All is well here. I just wanted to make sure I got the Sask stuff I sent you a few weeks or so ago. That was my first time to e-mail anything through Wikipedia, so just wanted to make sure. Have a good day! Moisejp (talk) 08:02, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi SriMesh. How's it going? I'm well. Wow, you sure added lots to Saskatchewan! I have the DVD for The Muppet Movie, so I will find the exact quote Kermit uses in "Movin' Right Along" about Saskatchewan. Also, when I was doing research for the old SIPC page, I came across this webpage: http://www.saskatoonlibrary.ca/html/LHistorysong.html but it was right before the SIPC article was going to be deleted so I didn't have a chance to check out many of the quotes. I will try to check a few of them out in the next few days. Bye for now! Moisejp (talk) 01:56, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Added the Muppets quote, fixed up some punctuation, and left a note on the discussion page. Check it out! Moisejp (talk) 23:52, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ayyavazhi article to FAC

Hai User:SriMesh, I am thinking of nominating Ayyavazhi for the Featured article. What is your opinion? Do you think that the article was fit in all ways to be so? If not i need you kind suggestions and helps. Thanks - PAUL RAJ 13:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I am trying to move forward; Thanks very much for your valuable suggestions. - PAUL RAJ 08:57, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
User:SriMesh, Thanks very much for voting in the Ayyavazhi article FAC. - PAUL RAJ 16:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
User:Amarrg has made some comments in the FA nomination page of Ayyavazhi. Can you please try solving the issue? I'll also. - PAUL RAJ 05:32, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Friend, With high respect for your suggestion, I request you that can you please explain with other words; I mean with examples from the articles itself? Sorry for the inconvenience. - PAUL RAJ 17:28, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
I've made corrections with the article as per your suggestions. Please take a look. Thanks for you kind helps. - PAUL RAJ 14:14, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Transportation in Saskatchewan

Updated DYK query On 24 January 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Transportation in Saskatchewan, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 12:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Roads invitation

The invite says it's for the roads project, but when I click on the link it takes me to the Saskatchewan project. Might wanna fix that, eh? (*grin*) Bearcat (talk) 22:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Portal Alberta

Thanks for the kind words about the photos. I will offer some more to the Alberta Portal as I get additional ones of comparable quality.Cszmurlo (talk) 04:04, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ayyavazhi GAC Reassessed

User:SriMesh, User:Ncmvocalist had reassesed the Ayyavazhi article and had still clamed that the article lacks Good prose, MOS guidelines, Fair Use rationales, the article is not in focus, ect. He had also made suggestions. Can you please help in maintaining it.

Leave the reference section, i will prove its relaiability and hence the article's NPOV. But I need help in the above issues. Thanks - PAUL RAJ 09:02, 5 February 2008 (UTC)


Thanks very much for you help. I kindly request you that keep an eye on the MOS of the article, since I can't do anything better than you, Thanks. - PAUL RAJ 07:35, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Ayyavazhi

I'm sure there are other articles that have managed to find a way of 'getting around' issues like the one that you have mentioned. However, if it is indeed impossible to make the prose both well written, and clear throughout the article (even with respect to these names), then the article is destined to staying at a B grade as it does not come up to the required standard of other articles that are at a higher grade.

So, instead of making a separate sentence for explaining that the name has changed, incorporate it into the previous sentence in which the name was used. So in effect, you should be tightening the expression of the article so that every sentence is focused on the heading under which you've written it, rather than having indirectly relevent sentences floating around. Eg; Instead of having "Ayyavazhi began to be noticed initially by the large number of people gathering to worship Vaikundar (birth name 'Mudisoodum Perumal' )[28] (1809 C.E – 1851 C.E)[29] at Poovandanthoppe. Poovandanthoppe is the name of a village now called Swamithoppe. The Thuvayal thavasu..." -> try "Ayyavazhi began to be noticed initially by the large number of people gathering at the village, Poovandanthoppe to worship Vaikundar...." So a reader can click on Poovandanthoppe and after being redirected to the Swamithoppe article, the first sentence states that Swamithoppe was previously known as Poovandanthoppe. Similarly, the fact that there is no article on Vaikundar is another major concern. Anyway, good luck! Ncmvocalist (talk) 04:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Saskatchewan, etc.

Hi SriMesh. How are you doing? Sorry I haven't been too helpful lately. I have been quite busy and haven't put in a lot of Wikipedia time in recently. Actually, I have another project (i.e. article) or two that I hope to work on before I would be able to find time to get back to the Saskatchewan quotes stuff. Did you end up finding the file you saved from the old SiPC article? If you are eager to do more work on the Sask quotes and want me to send you what I saved from the old SiPC article I could. But I don't want it to seem like I'm dumping extra work on you when I said that I was going to help you. I know you would probably appreciate someone else to jump in there and help you along. But I will try to get back to the quotes thing sooner or later. Bye for now, and take care! Moisejp (talk) 02:51, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Saskatchewan Spotlight Award

Many thanks for the Saskatchewan Spotlight Award... nice to know my contributions are appreciated. Here's to continued success of WikiProject Saskatchewan! Drm310 (talk) 18:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] importance vs class

You recently assessed a series of articles, but they have importance mixed up with class (so they show up as un-assessed and unknown importance). Could you please fix the remaining ones at Category:Unknown-importance Canada-related articles. Thank you. --Qyd (talk) 21:25, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Proposal Of A New Section Of The Newsletter

Long time no chat. I got an idea after seeing it on another newsletter I get. A section of articles for deletion. Current, kept, and deleted would be the sections and each month we could update the list. Mr. C.C. (talk) 00:53, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

I try to do stuff on Wikipedia as I can. I saw the idea on the WikiProject Professional Wrestling newsletter. Mr. C.C. (talk) 04:41, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Don't link to the actual article. Link to the deletion discussion. Mr. C.C. (talk) 04:50, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Assesment Banner For WikiProject: Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods

I gave a textual assesment for the Kinoosao, Saskatchewan article and the issue of an assesment banner of for WP:SKCN is something I keep thinking about. I know that the current WP:SKCN banner is working on being changed. I am wondering if we can put our heads together and get it done. Mr. C.C. (talk) 19:02, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Spotlight Award Question

Does the Spotlight Award cover the WP:SKCN and WP:SKRD? I am just wondering. Mr. C.C. (talk) 19:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Award

Thank you for the award! Reggie Perrin (talk) 22:43, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you for the award!

Hi, SriMesh. Thank you very much for the Saskatchewan Spotlight award, AND the I Love Saskatchewan award! Shanemcd (talk) 04:05, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you too for the award!

Hi, SriMesh. Thank you very much for the I Love Saskatchewan award! It motivetes me to continue contribuiting. Gypaetus (talk) 20:17, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hidden Page

Image:Fooled-you2.jpg This user has been fooled by Destructo_087.






[edit] Referencing The Prince Albert, Saskatchewan Article

I left some discussion on this on WP:SKCN talk page. It needs a lot of work as far as references go. I have added some, but it needs a lot more to be considered for good article status in the least. I know you will do what you can. Mr. C.C. (talk) 02:51, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] St. Lina Aerodrome

Well it appears that St. Lina is in Alberta, so it looks like an error. However, I'm at home right now and don't have access to the manual. I'll double check it later when I get to work. By the way the next one I created right after that was Estevan (Blue Sky) Aerodrome so St. Lina is probably not near Estevan. THanks for seeing it. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 08:44, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Yep it was Alberta. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 14:48, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for the invitation to Saskatchewan Project

I'm flattered. I'm not a Canadian, but I do have relatives in Grimshaw, Alberta, so I have an idea of prairie culture. The only person from Saskatchewan that I actually know is Michael Rieder, the pediatrician that got baby walkers banned in Canada. I'd be happy to act as a neutral referee from south of the border (54-40). Pustelnik (talk) 22:31, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your note

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button Image:Signature_icon.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! GreenJoe 02:04, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Friends of Fiddlers Green

See reply on my page. Pustelnik (talk) 21:24, 24 March 2008 (UTC) Thank you for your help, I always thought they were notable. Pustelnik (talk) 23:14, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Notability

Just so you know, I've removed some from that list which either have had sufficient references added, have already been redirected or should never have been listed in the first place (registered political parties, numbered provincial highways, etc.) Bearcat (talk) 22:42, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

I completely agree in the case of Holy Trinity — although the idea that high schools are encyclopedically notable still personally makes me itch, the article does contain independent references and the education project does generally regard high schools as notable. Bearcat (talk) 22:58, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Spotlight Award

Here is the Spotlight Award nominated by yours truly.

Saskatchewan Spotlight Award

Mr. C.C. (talk) 05:27, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Template:PartofWPSASKATCHEWAN

I created the following template: Template:PartofWPSASKATCHEWAN after seeing one for the Canada WikiProject. This template overrides the Canada one and there has to be a way to use both. Mr. C.C. (talk) 18:21, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Portal:R&B and Soul Music

I'm just surprised that lots of Beyonce related articles are being posted on Portal:R&B and Soul Music/Selected article, especially Irreplaceable on Portal:R&B and Soul Music/Selected article/8. Thanks for choosing them, but my concern is there is no template or proper acknowledgment posted in every article's respective discussion pages that these articles got featured in the portal. Thank you. --Efe (talk) 05:57, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

replied at Efe's talk page.
Hello Srimesh. Good Morning (in Philippine time). Thanks for the prompt reply. For the non-free images, I was really thinking yesterday that the idea of posting them in the portal is against the policy. Most portals and even the main page do not post non-free images. When a song-related article is featured, they do not use the single's cover; instead, they use available free image used in the article—of course, nice images. I'm really interesting to be part of the project Wikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, and I believe the portal is part of it. However, the project is dying, almost. You can count on me for further improvements. --Efe (talk) 00:28, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
I've replied to most of your queries and good work for the template. --Efe (talk) 00:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
I've removed some also. Is there a newsletter for the project? --Efe (talk) 00:47, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the link. Just wondering why my talk page is categorized to GA-Class R&B and Soul Music articles. --Efe (talk) 01:20, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Its fine. Thanks for fixing. --Efe (talk) 02:26, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Portal:R&B and Soul Music

{{helpme}} The thing most frustrating with the portal is that the images which are fair use for the articles, are not remaining on the portal which refers to the articles. Would like to know how to proceed...not use fair use images for a portal, do a fair use explanation for each image used on the portal or what have you. Kind Regards. SriMesh | talk 17:59, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes, not using questionable fair use images would be the best, see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Fair_use, however opinions differ. Mion (talk) 18:45, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Nice portal btw. Mion (talk) 18:51, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Template R&B and Soul Music Selected article

Hey, I deleted this as you seemed to accidentially create it in the article space, and there is already one at Template:R&B and Soul Music Selected article, meaning moving it would be pointless. J Milburn (talk) 22:09, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

If you want a page you've accidentially created to be deleted, you can tag it with {{db-author}}. J Milburn (talk) 22:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Quebec Hip Hop Rap

Hi, I have a few questions for you on my talk page after your edit. Fgenolini (talk) 23:17, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: SK 16/SK 58

No problem. Just the thing is, GAs don't usually pass w/o pictures. And that 16 has the best chance of passing compared to the other two. Mitch32contribs 22:44, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

I gave it a lookover, as did several others. I'm on the edge of failing it because its screwed up with MoS. If you want some opinions, the #wikipedia-en-roads IRC channel is where I am as well. SK 16 is a big mess, no history should be in the route description, etc. Please, if you want help, ask in the IRC channel.Mitch32contribs 23:36, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
The article still has problems. 1) MoS and puncutation issues throughout, 2) infobox needs to be expaned, 3) no need for the RM box, 4) split apart the images (they're too bunched up), 5) Jct list should only be kilometres. This is from others. Mitch32contribs 22:10, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
How about the words "Look now" - -I just fixed half your problems. :) Mitch32contribs 22:45, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Being a little nitpicky but: 6) Use either SK or Hwy throughout the article, 7) What is twinning? 8) Section 2.6 needs cleanup, 9) Ghost town section needs a notability mention, or it should be removed, 10) Section 2.5 - How can a highway be "graveled"? - These need fixing.Mitch32contribs 23:49, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Saskatchewan Highway 16

I am trying to tweak this article to make it a GA it is on hold. I have placename sizes via the latests census, but always re-stating that the date of the population was 2006 and the cite source is making a hard to read prosy article is there a better way of citing the facts to not get a fact tag, but still say the size of the village or hamlet? Thank you.SriMesh | talk 19:42, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I don't quite understand. Could you rephrase your question? Thanks. Microchip 08 20:44, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
You can use <cite name="foo"/> if the item named 'foo' was already used before your use of it. So you can do something like <cite name="foo"> blah</cite> and later on in the article do <cite name="foo"/> and basically reuse the prior citation.. PS I'm going to remove the helpme tag, re-add it when and if you need clarification. —— nixeagle 20:55, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Hey! ok, that is basic wikimarkup... I'm not sure if there is a way round that. However you do have a few options here. First you can continue as you are doing now, putting that tag after each number. Or you can place the tag after each paragraph, and simply place a {{citationneeded}} tag after those that you don't have a citation for. —— nixeagle 21:28, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Saskatchewan highway shields

Hey. I fixed the Saskatchewan shield template in {{Infobox road}} to use a variation of Pomte's shield template on all articles. You can see it in action on Saskatchewan Highway 58. I'm also in the process of developing a Saskatchewan junction template (that, with some tricky code, could probably be expanded for any Canadian province) that will simplify the amount of code required to generate a junction table. Regards, TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 15:52, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Naming of Government Departments MoS

((help me)) Don't know how to name the Department of Highways and Transportation (Saskatchewan) / Ministry of Highway and Infrastructure (Saskatchewan) / Highways and Infrastructure (Saskatchewan) / Saskatchewan Highways and Infrastructure / Saskatchewan Department of Highways and Transportation / Saskatchewan Ministry of Highway and Infrastructure OR... Highways and Transportation (Saskatchewan) wikipedia article. Naming conventions discussion started here. Thank you. SriMesh | talk 02:12, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Saskatchewan Highway 1

No problem; I'll get to it in the morning. An en-dash is the first dash next to "Insert:" at the bottom of the editing page. It refers to a dash that has the width of a standard "n". Another way to insert an en-dash is to write out &ndashplus-a-semicolon. —Rob (talk) 04:03, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] SK newsletter

Give me a day, I can think about it. Thanks!Mitch32contribs 00:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for supporting my nomination (Interstate 70 in Utah) at FAC. Dave (talk) 03:05, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

In case you are no longer following the discussion, this is one last response to your comment:
The external link I found is here:[1]. Although, this is not complete, missing the truck speed limits (40MPH) placed on the hilly areas. I'll keep looking, and if I can't find a better one, use this as an external link. The page is actually very good, but with a URL of members.aol.com would certainly be challenged as a self published source.Dave (talk) 02:42, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Age of Empires

Hi, I've replied to your comments. Thanks for taking the time to review. Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 12:03, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] re:May Newsletter

The notice looks good as it is. I'll start working on some next week when I'm done writing exams too. -Royalguard11(T·R!) 02:35, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

Updated DYK query Did you know? was updated. On 23 April 2008, a fact from the article Carlyle Clare Agar, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cheers, Bobet 12:41, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

Updated DYK query On 23 April 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ministry of Highways and Infrastructure (Saskatchewan), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cheers, Bobet 12:41, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit]

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 2, Issue 5 - May 2008

New condensed format delivered by: ENewsBot. Thank you!

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 11:20, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Twillingate, Newfoundland and Labrador

Hi,

You said that the article Twillingate, Newfoundland and Labrador needed improvements before being passed for the good article nominations, though I can't find in the talk page the improvements you requested. I'm one of the main contributors to the article and I'd appreciate if you provided the information as to what you would like to see improved. Thank you. NeonFire (talk) 20:30, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

I've responded and fixed most of the things you mentioned during the review, though there were a few things I found unclear. Could you provide an update as to what else (more specifically) should be improved before pass/fail? Thanks! NeonFire (talk) 11:44, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
I've responded again. NeonFire (talk) 19:30, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Ignore those comments. I didn't notice you responded above the section you split. This is my new response: "Sorry, I didn't see the comments above before. I added to the lead, added captions to the images attributing the authors of those images and added some of the notable people back into the bottom of the history section as well as the new Government and politics section. Being a town of only 2400 people, there isn't much to say about government." NeonFire (talk) 19:58, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
I've responded again. NeonFire (talk) 22:33, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Indian Head and Qu'Appelle photos

How wonderful that you were able to add photos to these articles. Did you happen to get any current streetscapes as well? Masalai (talk) 15:58, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh, terrific! Do put them up -- and please let me know when you do. I'm sure I can figure out what the buildings are.Masalai (talk) 06:12, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Twillingate, Newfoundland and Labrador

You passed this article yesterday. Unfortunately, I have found several issues with the GA criteria that need to be addressed, so I think your passing it was a little premature. The article will be delisted from WP:GA in one week unless the issues are resolved.

Also, when passing GAs, please do not start a new main section for 'successful good article nomination'. Please keep the article pass in the same main section as the review. This will make things much easier when reviews are archived at a later point. Dr. Cash (talk) 22:24, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

As an additional note, one thing that might help out, especially in the area of 'completeness/broadness' with city articles is to become somewhat familiar with the city article guidelines at WP:USCITY and WP:UKCITIES. If the article is missing a several main sections from those guidelines, it fails the completeness criterion. Also, keep an eye out for sections with very little content (2-4 sentences), which indicates some completeness issues. Even a major section like history should have more than two paragraphs. The history section should tell the story of the development of the city, from ancient times (if the city's that old) to modern day. One thing I am seeing with a lot of recent articles is that they do a good job with history, but really skimp on recent history, cutting off largely around world war II, which leaves off about sixty years or so. Dr. Cash (talk) 01:55, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Scarborough, Ontario

There are also issues with this article, and it will be delisted from WP:GA within one week if they are not addressed. Dr. Cash (talk) 22:50, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] St. Bernard School, Saskatoon

St. Bernard School, Saskatoon marked with a general notability guideline Please see User:Eusebeus/School Notability. There are other sources which regard schools as generally notable as wellSriMesh | talk 20:10, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

It wasn't me who added the template, it was User:Epbr123. Jake the Editor Man (talk) 20:13, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mount Royal, Saskatoon

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mount Royal, Saskatoon, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Mount Royal, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:34, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Saskatoon John G. Diefenbaker International Airport

Thanks. I added an image to the box and put some in a gallery. I also went to Transport Canada and using the first box (Mark) I was able to identify some of the aircraft and updated the Commons pictures. Just use the last four letters off the aircraft and it will tell you what they are and the owner. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 07:43, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Just some of your images:
  • Saskatoon 084 is a 1966 Piper PA-28-160 Cherokee
  • Saskatoon 085 is a 1976 Piper PA-28R-200 Cherokee Arrow
  • Saskatoon 086, 087, 088, 089 and 092 are all Fokker F-28-1000s of Canadian Regional Airlines.
  • Saskatoon 090 is a 1976 Piper PA-28-151 Cherokee
  • Saskatonn 091 is a Cessna of some kind.MilborneOne (talk) 17:47, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
I can't actually recognise a lot of aircraft as we tend to get the same ones all the time so I had to use the call signs to ID them. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 15:41, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Central Business District, Saskatoon

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Central Business District, Saskatoon, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Central Business District, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:33, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pleasant Hill, Saskatoon

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pleasant Hill, Saskatoon, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Pleasant Hill, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:53, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sasaktoon neighbourhoods

I have responded to most of the comments you entered. Hopefully they will be useful to those interested in the neighbourhood articles. Drm310 (talk) 19:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] I award you with...

The R&B and Soul Music Award
I, Eduemonitalk, award the R&B and Soul Music Award to SriMesh for for your comprehensive work on the Soul and R&B WikiPortal, wikipedia is really improved by users like you, regards!!!

[edit] Forestry Farm Park and Zoo

Thanks for the photos of the airport, it adds to the page. Would you have any in your collection that would be a good fit for the Forestry Farm Park and Zoo. (M@sk (talk) 03:48, 21 May 2008 (UTC))

Thanks for the photos, I will try to integrate more of them as I expand the article. --M@sk (talk) 03:52, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Sports facilities

Hi, SriMesh. I am attempting to revive WP:WikiProject Sports facilities and noticed that you were the creator of {{WikiProject Sports facilities}}. I want to invite you stop back by the project and participate in getting things going, again. Best wishes. --Gwguffey (talk) 04:46, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] PEI project

Thanks for the invitation. My knowledge is limited and in any event I would have to pass as my time to contribute may shortly become limited. Jonathan Logan (talk) 13:12, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Commons project

Hi. Thanks for the invitation and I wish you the best but I'm going to decline to participate, at least for a while. I feel a great deal of annoyance with the administration of the Commons project and deal as little as possible with it. Cheers! DoubleBlue (Talk) 02:29, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit]

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 2, Issue 6 - June 2008

New condensed format delivered by: ENewsBot. Thank you!

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 11:28, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Commons wikiproject got moved

The page at the Commons got moved which means that all the links to it no longer work. The correct link is now Commons:Commons:WikiProject Canada. I fixed the link at Meta and added it at Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board#Commons wikiprojects but I wan't sure where else it was linked from. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 15:33, 5 June 2008 (UTC)