Talk:Srinagarindra
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please consult Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (Thailand-related articles)#Cast votes
Arrigo has been moving this article even though the naming issue was solved by Violetriga. Arrigo please stop your unwarranted moves on other articles without waiting for the end of a discussion, you are in violation of Wikipedia rules. thank you. Gryffindor
It was suggested that this article should be renamed Sangwal Mahidol. The vote is shown below: royal titles are not included in article titles
- oppose of course they are - at33 17:40, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
There is something deeply disturbing in the alleged closing of the vote, actually unsigned abovew. This diff [1] shows interestingly that besides closing a vote, the closer (violetriga) had also somehow produced the two opinions there presented. 217.140.193.123 20:56, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose, keep her at the simple location. There's no consensus in the Thai manual of style, yet the short name fits the manual of style of western royals. andy 21:28, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose per simple location (agree with Andy). Keep her at Srinagarindra rather than put any titles nor territorial designations to the heading. Srinagarindra is a unique given name, never belonged to anyone else than this lady - thus no disambiguation is needed. This simplicity is endorsed by a clear majority in polling these questions for MoS Thailand. Arrigo 16:10, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. Dragons flight 01:54, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] old misc
Bwahaha. It seems that Antares is not capable of writing an article about a royal woman without stating repetitively that Her Royal Highness the Princess did whatever... same fullness of titulary probably if her royal highness the princess went to toilet :)) 217.140.193.123 21:24, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] copyright problem?
Am I correct in having an impression that the text is taken from the subject's dynasty website, copyright held by someone there??? 217.140.193.123 21:24, 10 July 2005 (UTC)