Talk:Srija

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 2008-03-25. The result of the discussion was keep (merge to Chiranjeevi suggested).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

[edit] Rfd??

This article is of no encyclopedic use. I wonder why this was created and even attempts were made to expand it. Any second opinions? Regards Mspraveen 14:55, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Srija clearly passes WP:BIO and WP:N.[1]A search in google draws more than 200000 hits.Enough for a person to establish notabality for an article.Pharaoh of the Wizards 15:18, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Srija is known only for one event and you might notice why I said this article is not for encyclopedic use. No offense meant but, I don't see how this article contributes other than being a page 3 news article. Regards, Mspraveen 19:45, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
I was hoping to see a reply to my observations. Since, I don't see any reply to this till date, I guess, I'd have to ask for an admin to arbitrate on this. Regards, Mspraveen (talk) 14:01, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
sorry for the delayed response.I had not marked this page on my watchlist.Very Sorry.I feel it should it stay as it significant hits for a individual.She is chiranjeeve's daughter and very well known in Andhra in particular.she is a household name even before the marriage episode.she was able to meet the President just a few months ago.she has all along been in the news more so after the marriage.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:53, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
I suggest you merge this article in the Chiranjeevi article page. I feel that a new article for 'Srija' is not a judicious decision especially since this article has trivial content and no real hope of any further expansion. It shall just be forgotten as one event article. A google search for any name like Rajesh or Mahesh will yield you equal or higher number of results on Google. Citing 200000 hits is a very poor argument (see Non valid general criteria in WP:BIO#Additional_criteria). Next up, you may read WP:NOTINHERITED. After reading this, tell me if the article is of any encyclopedic use. There might be many people who must have ran away and gotten married. Given that Wikipedia is open source, probably it is not a good idea to use valuable server space for articles which lack encyclopedic use. Do you agree? I shall wait for your reply in the next two weeks. Either, you or I can put up a merge tag. If you still think otherwise, I'll have to put this article for discussion and I hope you do realize that some editors/admins are the least bit lenient and might not even entertain your poor arguments. This might even warrant a deletion. Regards, Mspraveen (talk) 11:10, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Please feel free to take it to an AFD if you want.[2].There are over 60000 hits relating specifically to her.Feel this enough for an article about her.She is chiranjeeve's daughter and well known in Andhra even before the marriage.If the consenus is to delete.I will accept it.Further she is celebraty in Andhra and a well known figure there even before the marriagePharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:05, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

No offense meant here. You have probably gotten me wrong. I'm trying to resolve this mutually. Afd cases are extreme and I don't want to go that far. Instead, in the best interest of the community I was hoping that you agree to have this merged with the Chiranjeevi article. And, it seems that you have not observed what I mentioned -
  1. Non valid general criteria in WP:BIO#Additional_criteria doesn't warrant the hits of the person to prove notability.
  2. WP:NOTINHERITED does mean that someone related to a celebrity cannot inherit notability/importance.
I don't see an appropriate response to this, and hence I will be looking to take further steps in the next few days. With best regards, Mspraveen (talk) 05:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
  1. Msprvaeen I feel we take it to the community to decide on it.The notablity whether it should be there or not.she is all Andhra celebraty.even all over India.I do agree but if it is not entirely WP:NOTINHERITED.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:26, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
  • this article must be rewritten than to be deleted nor merged , but due to its current state it may be merged , but its sure that this person is notable , Chiranjeevi is quite popular all through south and not only an Andhra fame . --Pearll's sun (talk) 12:38, 25 March 2008 (UTC)


Google hits over 40000 exclusively about her.[3]and in Yahoo [4] She is a household name in Andhra Pradesh and known in India.feel enough notablity for a person clearly passes WP:BIO and WP:N for an individual


For people who do not know about chiranjeevi, please let me explain. Chiranjevi is THE MOST SUCCESSFUL TELUGU FILM STAR and POSSIBLY the NEXT MAJOR POLITICAL LEADER. The charitable trust that is run by his numerous fans associations has the LARGEST BLOOD BANK IN INDIA. "Chiranjeevi" has 423,000 hits on google. You may argue that there could be many links unrelated to the person. So "MEGASTAR CHIRANJEEVI" has 63800 hits on google. You might want to check his trust site [5]. This shows that he is extremely popular. Srija is his daughter who eloped to marry her boyfriend. It created a sensation for a week. Try searching for articles on her after 2007. I am sure there aren't any, because it was a short lived sensation. What lives on is the legend and social work of chirajeevi. PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS ARTICLE. GIVEN SOME TIME, I WILL PERSONALLY COLLECT DATA ABOUT HIM AND UPDATE THE ENTIRE ARTICLE--Sandeep346 (talk) 17:44, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Separate Article

Google hits over 40000 exclusively about her.[6]and in Yahoo [7] She is a household name in Andhra Pradesh and known in India.feel enough notablity for a person clearly passes WP:BIO and WP:N for an individual.she is notable enough to have a separate article.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:43, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

She's notable now, it's "crystalballery" to say she won't be at some point.She is a household name further merging 2 people articles is akin to deleting Srija article.I would not have objected had to say wanted merging of anmusic album with the composer or TV character with Serial article.But 2 people into one.Means deleting one person's article particurly after it survived WP:AFD Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:42, 19 April 2008 (UTC)