Talk:SR Class Q
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] GA review (pass)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
I spell checked it (please try to do this before nomination!) and made a couple of minor grammar changes, but now I feel it's suitable for GA. The Rambling Man 17:04, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Categories: Wikipedia good articles | Wikipedia CD Selection-GAs | GA-Class Good articles | Engineering and technology good articles | GA-Class rail transport articles | Low-importance rail transport articles | GA-Class UK Railways articles | Low-importance UK Railways articles | Locomotives task force articles | To do, trains