User talk:Squirminator2k

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1 vandalism of Fried (webcomic)
2 Wipeout
3 Fair use rationale for Image:Boxart adpin.jpg
4 Fair use rationale for Image:MK2-amiga.png
5 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Boxart ab2.jpg
6 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Boxart ab3d.jpg
7 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Boxart ab3d2.jpg
8 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Boxart abta.jpg
9 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Boxart arcadepool.jpg
10 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Boxart arcadepool2.jpg
11 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Boxart qwak.jpg
12 Worms Battle Rally

[edit] vandalism of Fried (webcomic)

Please do not vandalize this article if you disagree with the fact that it may be put up for deletion you are welcome to vote against the article being deleted if it's nominated, vandalism solves nothing and will just be reverted. Jtkiefer ^{T | @ | C} ----- 22:26, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

A bit silly really, considering it's my webcomic, but there we go. --Squirminator2k 22:30, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

Quite frankly I don't care and neither does the community as a whole, just because the article George W. Bush is about George W. Bush doesn't mean Bush can dictate what's on the article, the article belongs to the whole community and you have no greater ownership or rights than any other user. With all due respect. Jtkiefer ^{T | @ | C} ----- 22:32, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

But, of course, you do. --Squirminator2k 22:34, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

Not especially, to me your just another person who belives just because they are the subject of an article or just because they have a personal attachement to an article that they automatically own the article and control what happens to it, well your wrong. Also could you please post links if you have them to the previous AFD noms of this page so that I know what's going on, normally the closing admin should (if there is no consensus or the consensus is to keep) leave a note on the talk page of the article so people can review previous discussions but it appears the closing admin forgot to do that. Jtkiefer ^{T | @ | C} ----- 22:39, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

Nobody has nominated Fried (webcomic) for deletion. Yet. But Hahnchen will, at some point. He has a personal vendetta against webcomics that aren't Penny Arcade or CTRL+ALT+DEL. He went for and successfully deleted two webcomic entries Rooms (webcomic) and Built for Comfort - the latter had rather a few Keep votes, but Hen's decision was to ignore them and delete it anyway. He has also admitted that he is "not a fan" of webcomics. He bases virtually his entire argument on the Alexa system (a system that has been proven to be about as reliable as a plumber's estimate). How long before he goes for Fried?

Rooms is part of a triumvirate - the Psycheverse - consisting of Rooms, Fried and Apathy. And if you declare war on one of us, as Hahnchen has done, then you declare war on all of us. This is why I "vandalised" the article (if you can really call it that) - I did not want to give Hahnchen the satisfaction of the NfD process which he is happy to begin but not quite so happy to follow by the book. --Squirminator2k 22:45, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Wipeout

"F-Zero... (the game Psygnosis stated they originally drew most of their inspiration from)." [1]
Where did you get that information from? Lord Falcon 06:28, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

I believe it was an issue of Edge (magazine), although I forget which. I'll have a look when I get home, I'm at work at the moment. Squirminator2k 08:21, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Still waiting. Can you at least find it online? FullMetal Falcon 22:57, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Boxart adpin.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Boxart adpin.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Freedomeagle 03:57, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:MK2-amiga.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:MK2-amiga.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Boxart ab2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Boxart ab2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:53, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Boxart ab3d.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Boxart ab3d.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Boxart ab3d2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Boxart ab3d2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Boxart abta.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Boxart abta.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Boxart arcadepool.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Boxart arcadepool.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Boxart arcadepool2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Boxart arcadepool2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Boxart qwak.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Boxart qwak.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Worms Battle Rally

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Worms Battle Rally, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 14:00, 5 March 2008 (UTC)