User talk:Spyder00Boi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Spyder00Boi! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Image:Signature icon.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! ~Kylu (u|t) 08:36, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Tom@sBat 22:03, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Street scene.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Street scene.jpg.jpg. The copy called Image:Street scene.jpg.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 21:47, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of T-Vice

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on T-Vice, by Wikidan829, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because T-Vice seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting T-Vice, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate T-Vice itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:28, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Spyder00Boi

The article you created at Spyder00Boi was listed for deletion as An article about a real person that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject, criterion 7 in the criteria for speedy deletion, Articles section. Since it appears to be about you I've moved it to your user space instead, which was probably what you intended in the first place (a common mistake among newcomers!).

If you really did mean to create an article about yourself please be aware that this is often considered a bad idea, even if you do meet the guidelines for inclusion of biographies.

I know Wikipedia can be confusing for new editors, so you are welcome to ask for help at the help desk or on my talk page. Ocatecir Talk 23:36, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Rob James Washington.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rob James Washington.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:12, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Pics 0003.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pics 0003.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:04, 9 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Edward 17:04, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "Latin Canadian"

Welcome to Wikipedia. I edited the Latino Canadian article alot in the past two months, and now you've completely turned it into a different article! I'm not "mad" at you for making these changes, but there already is a Haitian Canadians article. Also, I dont know if Haitian people can be described as "Latin". If there's going to be a page about "Latin" Canadians, then you should at least keep the old one and create a new one. Blackjays1 01:45, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Quisqueya Christian School

A tag has been placed on Quisqueya Christian School, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Edokter (Talk) 22:14, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Yaquimelstreet.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Yaquimelstreet.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:14, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Labadee20harbor.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Labadee20harbor.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:11, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "of African descent"

The designation "of African descent" is really terribly general; it could include Lybian, Egyptian, Sudanese and Ethiopean provenance. Clearly, the vast majority of these slaves came from the Atlantic slave trade, which took its slaves predominantly from the Slave Coast and the Gold Coast.  --Lambiam 05:43, 25 August 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Santa Domingo

Revert your changes. By 500 they mean the period THE ISLAND itself was in turmoil, not the nation. So you should delete nation only. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.248.185.43 (talk) 03:06, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Quddus.jpg, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.mmmchicago.com/2006/02/12-week/. As a copyright violation, Image:Quddus.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Quddus.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Image:Quddus.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Image:Quddus.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Image:Quddus.jpg.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. -- LaNicoya  •Talk•  20:48, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Jacmelsquare.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jacmelsquare.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:07, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

I fixed the Gold Cup winning nations pics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gethomas3 (talkcontribs) 03:55, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Papview.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Papview.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:08, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Sautmathurine640.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sautmathurine640.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:08, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Massifmaphaiti.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Massifmaphaiti.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:10, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Haiti

fact of the matter is that there are many mixed haitians. There numbers are just small percentage-wise. Plus many white haitians pass as other nationalities etc. Haiti is a black-majority country but Haiti is much more racially diverse than many ppl believe. CIA Factbook are really estimates not solid facts... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.20.158.12 (talk) 23:36, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Hello. Etang Saumatre is most often used when you check it on Google. All interwiki links also use Etang Saumatre. And, this is most important, per EN Wikipedia naming conventions article should be placed under such title which is most commonly used in English. I think this is the case. You can also choose Wikipedia:Requests for move. Cheers. -- Darwinek (talk) 00:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mud "cookies"

The mud comes from a certain part of Haiti, sold for $5/100, and used as em, food. It's grim but sourced. Wnt (talk) 05:12, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Citesoleil.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Citesoleil.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Haitiangirl.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Haitiangirl.jpg. You don't seem to have said who created it or who owns the copyright. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Rmhermen (talk) 16:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Andreberto.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Andreberto.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:07, 16 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 19:07, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Dirt cookie. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Hersfold (t/a/c) 05:48, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:CONCACAF Championship host cities

A tag has been placed on Template:CONCACAF Championship host cities requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 01:56, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rio group

Hi, Haiti was missing because it was made from the list on an older version of the page which didnt include it. But I see the map has been updated now anyway. --Astrokey44 23:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nathalie Handal picture

Hello Spyder00Boi. This seems to be a good picture of Nathalie Handal, but you'll need to give a better explanation of the source and the licensing than 'I believe the picture can be used.' Otherwise the image authorities will probably delete it. It is not unheard of for a subject to voluntarily release an image to us. See WP:COPYREQ for how to request permission. EdJohnston (talk) 23:01, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Nathalie handal.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Nathalie handal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Relata refero (disp.) 11:33, 2 April 2008 (UTC) --Relata refero (disp.) 11:33, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Better source request for Image:Portauprinceview.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Portauprinceview.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 20:47, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Portauprinceview.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Portauprinceview.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 21:27, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Nathalie handal.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Nathalie handal.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kelly hi! 21:28, 17 May 2008 (UTC)