Talk:Spy Kids trilogy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Film Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B
This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
???
This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.

Contents

[edit] Stop it!

I have merged Bratinella's pictures into the original text. Both; please accept this. BlueValour 00:35, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] All of them

Why are all the movies here. If you look at Spy Kids 2: Island of Lost Dreams article just by itself, it's pretty long. So I think each film should get their own article. Tcatron565 16:07, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Internal link

I am going to delete the link to Spy Kids 3-D: Game Over at the bottom of this article since it instantly redirects back to Spy Kids when clicked on. If anyone has a problem with this edit, tell me. --Powerfulmind 01:48, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Article coverage

This article covers all three films, despite the fact that the other films have their own articles. Someone with a detailed knowledge of the subject should fix this. Atropos 22:42, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Main Article for first Spy Kids

Isn't there a main article baout the first Spy Kids? Instead of the whole entire trilogy? Unless we someone could REMOVE THE WHOLE ENTIRE ARTICLE TO MAKE IT JUST ABOUT THE FIRST SPY KIDS. In fact, this article should be moved to Spy Kids (trilogy) without the redirect, or we should not have it at all! Tyty1234 02:30, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Spy Kids 2.jpg

Image:Spy Kids 2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:59, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Requested move

I think that this article should be moved to Spy Kids (trilogy) without the redirect to this article because this article should be about the first Spy Kids Movie. Spy Kids 2: Island of Lost Dreams and Spy Kids 3D: Game Over has their articles so why can't the first one have it's own article? So we should move this article to Spy Kids (trilogy) or we should not have it at all! Tyty1234 18:50, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Support This article should be about the first movie. I feel the same about video games, "Final Fantasy" should be about the first game and NOT the series in general. Lrrr IV 22:53, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

While there is evidently support for having two pages, one for the first film and one for the trilogy, I am loath to move this page until there is something to replace it with. I would suggest starting the page which is intended to replace the current one at a new title, like Spy Kids (film). Alert me when that's ready and I'll happily make the changes. --Stemonitis 20:42, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Ok, it's ready, but the page has been removed by Tregoweth because it was a MascotGuy creation. I do hope this page doesn't get deleted again, but I put a notice on the page saying that the page is going to be moved. Good Luck and thanks! Tyty1234 08:14, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
I think you misunderstood me. I meant that you should write an article there, which can then be moved to fill the gap that moving this to Spy Kids (trilogy) would leave. --Stemonitis 08:21, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Ok, I got your point and I think I did somewhat to add details for this movie. You can now check Spy Kids (film) and make the changes. Tyty1234 17:56, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reform

Shouldn't there be a mention that none of the villains die, they all reform and turn good. A rare thing in movies. Emperor001 23:28, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 05:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

This article should be renamed to Spy Kids (film series) to bring it inline with the naming convention pertaining to film series. Let's discuss. - LA @ 10:34, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Survey

Please state whether or not you support the renaming of this article.

  • Oppose - Film series is less precise in describing these collective three works. How about Spy Kids trilogy (film series). — WiseKwai 12:58, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Serious comments only please - part of the problem with "trilogy" is just the fact it is tied to "three". Particularly recent film series have a habit of being "added to" (see. Die Hard, Indiana Jones etc). The only "loss" of precision is the 3 aspect which is itself a problem. If we then use the same form for all series we would need to call them "trilogies" "quadrilogies", "quin what evers" etc. This is confusing and unnecessary. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 12:16, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
I was being serious. WP:AGF — WiseKwai 17:14, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Support - Film series is nice neutral term and allows consistency. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 12:16, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Plenty of sources seem to refer to is as the "Spy Kids Trilogy", per [1]. -GTBacchus(talk) 00:01, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Spy kids.jpg

Image:Spy kids.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:44, 26 November 2007 (UTC)