Talk:Sprouting

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Re. request to merge sprouting with seed sprout, after reading the latter page there was nothing in it that wasn't in the former, thus I've changed that page into a redirector and removed the merge requests quercus robur 16:51, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Contents 1 "no more than about 550g daily"? 2 Nutrient density 3 Infomercial? 4 Incomplete Citations

[edit] "no more than about 550g daily"?

Joy Larkom, advises that to be on the safe side “one shouldn’t eat large quantities of raw legume sprouts on a regular basis, no more than about 550g (20oz) daily”

How reliable is this? Who is this person exactly? (some guy who wrote a book about veggies apparently). Anyway, can his contention be held to be true, and if so, why?Zigzig20s 13:45, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Joy Larkcom is a she for a start, and probably one of the UK's foremost writers on the subject of vegetable and salad gardening. I'd count her opinion as pretty reliable, and her contention, as clearly stated in the article already, is that some legumes contain levels of toxins in their uncooked state, thus best not to eat too many of them to be on the safe side. Have formated reference to this effect quercus robur 15:48, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Added links to hydroponics, aeroponic and aeroponics for additional information --Agrihouse 17:11, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

"Some legumes can contain toxins, which can be reduced by soaking, sprouting and cooking (eg, stir frying). Joy Larkcom, advises that to be on the safe side “one shouldn’t eat large quantities of raw legume sprouts on a regular basis, no more than about 550g (20oz) daily” [1]."

It can be reduced by sprouting...So the problem seems to be solved. And then 'she' up and says we shouldn't eat too much of it...I think there's a problem in the syntax here, if anything. Perhaps we could add a "however" before 'Joy Larkcom'?Zigzig20s 19:54, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nutrient density

The claim about "most nutrient dense food on earth" needs backing up with a suitable citation, as do some of the other claims about nutrition content. A definition of "nutrient" is also needed, in order to clarify what the claim actually means. Howard Wright 13:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)Howard Wright

[edit] Infomercial?

Should this article contain nutritional and dietary guidelines? The title/subject suggests to me an article with academic and practical information for the gardener or agriculture practitioner.

Sections 3 and 4 seem to be trying to sell a book about a diet and a GoGreen automatic sprouting machine. Perhaps that information could be moved to a 'dieting article' regarding the health benefits of eating sprouts, with a link to it provided from this page under the 'See also' section.

Just a suggestion. OutOfWhack 16:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Incomplete Citations

This article has a number of partial in-line citations without full citations anywhere else. For instance, "Shipard, 2005" is cited five times but nowhere is an article name, journal name, day or month, issue#, et cetera provided. Others include Chavan and Kadam (1989), Morgan et al. (1992) [?!! How many Morgans published anything that year?], Cuddeford (1989), Chung et al. (1989), Peer and Leeson (1985), MacLeod and White (1962), and Gontzea and Sutzescu (1958). I appreciate the information being provided, but without full citations the information is suspect. My feeling is it should be properly referenced or else removed. Anyone want to weigh in on this? -- Begeun (talk) 18:44, 31 May 2008 (UTC)