Wikipedia:Spoiler warning/RfC

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

✘ This Wikipedia page is currently inactive and is retained as a historical archive.
Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus has become unclear. If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you should seek broader input via a forum such as the proposals page of the village pump.

This is a request for comment (RfC) on the use of spoiler tags. This RFC aims to gather community opinion on the Wikipedia:Spoiler warning guidelines and its companion templates: {{spoiler}}, {{endspoiler}}, {{spoiler-about}}, {{spoiler-other}}, {{spoiler-blank}}, {{magic-spoiler}}, {{Solution}}, {{sgspoiler}}, {{Spoiler-season}} and {{Spoiler-solicitation}}.

Contents

[edit] Previous discussions

[edit] Older discussions

[edit] Examples of current usage

[edit] Arguments for and against

This is a very brief summary of the major arguments for and against the use of spoiler tags. Note that this is only intended to be an extremely brief summary, and all substantive reasoning of arguments can be found on this page's discussion page.

For:

  • Useful and helpful to some editors and readers; can aid in article navigation
  • A convention/practice that readers (and prospective future editors) would expect
  • Discourages exclusion of spoilers by some editors
  • Can be seen as a neutral label such as "Theme" or "Genre"
  • Avoids needing to restrict information to specific sections (such as "Plot details")
  • Choosing to add the tag or not is similar to other decisions in the editorial process
  • Are consistent with Wikipedia's mission and policy of being informative

Against:

  • An informative section header and Wikipedia's content disclaimer are enough
  • Violation of Wikipedia's "Neutral point of view policy", or "NPOV" which should cover content exclusion and inclusion
  • What is or is not a spoiler is subjective
  • Violation of Wikipedia's "Wikipedia is not censored" policy
  • Unprofessional and unencyclopedic
  • Organization issue; presents the notion that spoilers must be contained "inside the box" of begin-spoiler and end-spoiler templates

[edit] RfC discussion

All new discussion should be directed to this page's discussion page, where arguments and suggested solutions are discussed. Discussion should not be added below.