User talk:SpoticusKC

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello SpoticusKC! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Get adoption from an experienced user How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! CobaltBlueTony 16:23, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pallimed

Hi SpoticusKC. Thanks for leaving me a message. I've restored the link and adjusted the description to be less of a red flag. I did look at the page when I removed it and thought it pretty much fitted the description in the guidelines of a site not to be linked to. Since it's anonymous it is especially difficult to see it as authoritative. I've started a discussion on the talk page to see what other editors think. -- SiobhanHansa 01:27, 29 July 2007 (UTC)