Talk:Spots (cannabis)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 12 April 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
"how-to" sections have been fixed, but we still need more pop culture refs. i've been told there was/is a prominent stencil-graffiti mural in queenstown that says something along the lines of "save power this winter, turn the knives off", a picture of this would be awesome ;) Ars666 (talk) 19:33, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Page needs BIG cleanup. If anyone can help with structuring the article and removing the 'how-to' feel that it has currently WITHOUT deleting content please feel free.
There is also more information that needs to be on here.
References are good. It helps keep those overzealous deletionist nazis at bay.
--
wtf happen to this page?
this article used to have much more information and now its been reduced to a stub again!
how come this page was only created in january 08? it has been around much longer than that - this smacks of revisionist bullshit
What is going on in Wikipedia land? My friends and I made a serious effort to create the defintive article on 'spots' and it has been replaced by a paragraph from some hack that does not deserve to be a footnote to the original article. The ability of 'experts' to substitute informative expositions on a particular subject for brief and vacuous coverage is a detriment to Wikipedia as a whole. I'm sure that those who read the original article would agree. Why was it changed/massacred? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vpkiwi (talk • contribs) 06:41, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
I totaly agree. The old enrty was just right and even had a good photo. The current entry should go.
- The previous article was nominated for deletion, and the final consensus was to merge it with Cannabis smoking#Knife Hits. Please view the discussion HERE. I will, once again, nominate it for deletion. If you have anything to contribute, please contribute it to Cannabis smoking. ~ Wakanda's Black Panther! (contribs) 07:05, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
the knife hits entry doesnt even exist anymore! spotting is a widespread methods for smoking cannabis. i see that joints and bongs have their own page, whats the deal here, huh? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.234.233.190 (talk) 04:56, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Please read carefully wikipedia policies about adding new content: wikipedia:Attribution. Text without references may be deleted at any time. `'Míkka>t 15:43, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Mikka please read WP:GAME
No *new* content was added. Some of the the bias and 'how-to' were removed. This is actually an improvement over the previous page. References will come as page develops, how is it supposed to improve if people like you keep deleting the little content this article has?! It seems as though people are all too happy to totally trash other people's articles based on spurious reasons. Heres an idea: How about instead of deleting 95% of the article (including references), you IMPROVE it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.234.233.190 (talk) 19:17, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The improvement of this article
Over in the cannabis smoking article we have Jaysweet trying to further his personal agenda 13:08, 18 April 2008 Jaysweet (Talk | contribs) (13,708 bytes) (added "Spots" subsection, so we can delete the article on it) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shreeness (talk • contribs)
- That edit summary was probably less than ideal. However, you have to understand my intention: Someone had actually dug up a source or two for this article, and I do think the subject warrants coverage in Cannabis smoking even if I don't think it needs a whole separate article. I didn't want to lose track of the source in the event that the AfD closed with a Delete result. So what I really meant was, "added Spots subsection so that we can delete the article on it without losing the citations from the original article".
- It's funny I am getting so much criticism from people for gutting this article, because the article is actually waaaay better now and might stand a chance of surviving the AfD. Sometimes when an article is just so bad, so full of unsourced crap and original research and how-to guides and such, that it is better to gut it and start again than to try and fix it.
- There are still problems with the reliability of a few of the sources, but now the article has a serious tone, talks about the subject in a neutral manner, doesn't digress into unnecessary how-to information, and generally sounds like an encyclopedia article. That is great!
- I'm still inclined to say Merge to Cannabis smoking, but I'm much more ambivalent now. The article as it stands now is helpful to Wikipedia. The previous version of the article, IMO, was harmful to Wikipedia because it made the project look dumb and undermined its credibility. That's why I felt so strongly about getting rid of it. Now? Meh. It's still a little wacky to have a whole separate article about a regional pot-smoking technique, but I don't mind it that much. --Jaysweet (talk) 12:48, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- In retrospect I can see your point, and I apologise for my previous comments on the deletion page Dirtyfilthy (talk) 21:23, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- mmm tasty words.. yum yum! Ars666 (talk) 22:11, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Still skeptical
But I'll manage. I'm going to attempt to improve a few of these stoned articles (Lol, I'm so humorous.), now that they're here for good. Or for now. Whichever. I still strongly feel that this, as well as a few of the other Cannabis articles, should be merged into Cannabis smoking. But I won't add the template myself. Should another well-established editor come along that feels the same way, I welcome him or her to do so. And don't attempt to reply to me unless you can converse like a civil adult. ~ Wakanda's Black Panther!♠/♦ 00:58, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
