Talk:SportsChannel America
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ice Hockey, an attempt at building a useful ice hockey resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information). |
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canadian football, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Canadian football and the Canadian Football League on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. See comments | |
To Concerned Reader: Thanks for volunteering your time.---3rd-rate sports writer. Wait, shouldn't it be fourth-rate sports writer? I mean, the Slate story is about hockey, after all....
To Concerned Journalist: Perhaps mistaking 1-letter (making a common misspelling) in a 3rd-rate sports writer's name is less important than a sportswriter who can't even muster up the know-how to find a legitimate source for his story to link to. Then again, perhaps being smarmy is better than being smart. Thank you. ---A Concerned Reader With Little Else To Do Than Point Out Flaws In Sports Writers' Pseudonymously Published Smarmy Rebuttals.
This edit is to correct the previous editor who mistakenly refers to magazine writers "especially Chris Scott." The author of the Slate story in question is Chris Shott. Not Scott. As the previous editor noted, anyone may edit this site. But please: Don't misspell people's name. That's an automatic 'F' in journalism school. Thank you. ---A Concerned Journalist In Search Of Careful Readers
This edit is to show Slate magazine writers ((especially Chris Scott, who wrote the article linking here)) and other news/opinion sites run as journalistic endeavors that linking to Wikipedia for accuracy/more explanation on story is idiotic and untruthful. Anyone may edit this site; anyone may put false truths into a linked story. Expecting a site like this, with no accuracy guaranteed, to back up your story as a "truth" isto show you are not a journalist, but a high school gossip. It shows the untrustable quality of both your work and your publication. Please leave up until the Slate story by Chris Scott, dated 06/08/2006 and entitled "Ice Guys Finish Last" is archived off the main site. This is not about punishing Wikipedia, which has uses as seeing what popular "fact" is. This is about showing bad journalists what not to do. Thank you. ---A Concerned Reader in search of truthful journalists. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 4.42.244.62 (talk • contribs) 16:31, June 9, 2006.
