User talk:Spinkava

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Notable Alpha Phi Omega people

I reverted it because we have the national office as a source (see the edit history), and that's pretty much the most official record you can get of whether or not someone is a brother and which chapter they belong to. Justinm1978 (talk) 22:44, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

However, your source is a "personal conversation", I have a newspaper article. I will call national next week to clear this up. Spinkava 22:47, 22 February 2008

I would tell you how I got those boxes, but you seem to have figured it out already :) Justinm1978 (talk) 04:20, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RE: User:spinkava/GGWO → Greater Grace World Outreach

What you have proposed is a merge request, not a move request, as extensive page history already exists at the latter location. Please visit WP:PM for instructions no how to propose/request at merger. Thanks. JPG-GR (talk) 05:52, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Talk Pages

Spinkava: for future reference, please place your new talk messages at the bottom of the page. Your request for the review of Greater Grace World Outreach was placed at the top of the talk page which makes it harder to find, and acknowledge. Tiggerjay (talk) 16:55, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Greater Grace World Outreach

Please note that I recently performed some BOLD edits to Greater Grace World Outreach in hopes to help clarify and bring neutrality to the article, however there is still some major work that needs to be done since I do not have enough background information. I am simply coming in as an edit to help clean-up the mess. :) Please see my comments on the article talk page, along with some in-line comments in the article. Tiggerjay (talk) 18:06, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:Greater Grace World Outreach

Thank you for your involvement with editing this page and your interest in having a consensus reached in this article so the block can be lifted and the article to be brought to some sort of consensus. I was brought in by a request on the Christianity Project page to have someone review the article. I have absolutely no former knowledge of GGWO, nor any particular bias. All I can tell you it in its current state, it looks like an absolute disaster (both the article, and the organization as a whole). My hopes is to help bring the interested editors to the table on the talk page to resolve the conflicts and have the page properly created/edited. Please take a moment to go over to the talk page and review my most recent postings. Also do no be alarmed as your earlier comments/posts were refactored and archived (there is a link available on the page to the archive). My post is only one of several which will hopefully help guide this page towards something everybody can agree is appropriate. Tiggerjay (talk) 00:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fresh Prospective

Spinkava: Please take a moment while on your break to contribute to non-religious / non-christian / non-GGWO while you're on break. Spend your time contributing to something regarding teaching, or mathematics or anything else that interests you... It would be a great break and give you an opporunity to work on editing an article with like minded contributors. Tiggerjay (talk) 22:30, 15 May 2008 (UTC)