Talk:Spirula

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Cephalopods, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use cephalopod resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.

[edit] Photos

When upload is available again, I will upload an out-of-copyright (1910) pencil sketch plus my own photograph of spirula shell. Am trying to trace email address for the copyright holder of a photo of the entire creature: Martina Compagno Roeleveld

I have tried various email addresses at museums.org.za and samuseum.ac.za , and all seem to fail. Is there a member in Capetown who could contact the museum directly? dramatic 08:56, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Ram's Horn Squid?!

Hello -- I've studied this beast at length, and have written two scientific papers about them [1], specifically their evolution and the organisms that encrust their shells. In ten years, I have never, ever read or heard this common name -- "ram's horn squid". It strikes me as being redundant, using a term to "seem" more accessible while actually using a name hardly used by people who would encounter these animals and never by scientists working on them. The reference mentioned on CephBase [2] is official only insofar as those authors say it is: common names are not covered by the rules of the ICZN and don't have any scientific value at all. I really think the best title for this article is Spirula, which is what people working in the field generally call it. Since it's a deepwater squid, it's not something that "needs" a common name, especially one that isn't used much anyway.

Cheers, Neale Neale Monks 16:24, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

I completely agree with you. I'd say at least 90% of the "common" names listed on CephBase are in fact quite obscure and far less common than their scientific counterparts. Right now WikiProject Cephalopods follows WikiProject Birds naming conventions. I think a policy change is in order. Mgiganteus1 16:37, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

See also previous discussion at Talk:Argonaut (animal). Mgiganteus1 16:39, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

I see. Yes, some Wikipedia editors (ones who are not biologists, I suspect) do seem to like that rule about common names! It's dumb rule. Quick Google test: Spirula = 123,000 hits, "Ram's Horn Squid" = 333. Of those 333, only 205 are not mirrors or copies of the Wikipedia article! Cheers, Neale Neale Monks 17:08, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Agreed. I originally created the article at Spirula and someone moved it. There seemed to be several "common name" candidates, so picking one out seemed rather odd. Far better to have various common names redirecting to the scietific name. dramatic 08:40, 12 December 2006 (UTC)