Talk:Spiritualism/Comments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Changing the reference citations so that they are all of one uniform type would be helpful. Also, there should be at least one, preferably more than one, reference per section. The red links could be addressed, even if only with the creation of minimal articles. Lastly, two of the subsections are currently only one comparatively short paragraph long; they could be expanded. With those concerns expressed, and maybe some slight stylistic improvements, I think that this article could well be a very realistic candidate for at least good article consideration. Badbilltucker 15:12, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

"Other prominent believers" could either have more details on some of the names, or perhaps be spun out as a separate article, like "List of spiritualists". Some of the red links could be made into at least stubs, or maybe be changed. "Perhaps the best known of those who combined Swedenborg..." could be more direct, like maybe "Prominent among those who..." Otherwise, solid B, could maybe get GA with a few more references, the changes above, and maybe a few other "cleanup" actions. John Carter 00:15, 12 July 2007 (UTC)