User:Spetey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Philosophy task list Protected Values first section confuses right action and values and needs a copy edit, moving and wikifying Ludwig Wittgenstein is having its FA status reviewed due to a couple of concerns. Help save Ludwig! See Wikipedia:Featured article review/Ludwig Wittgenstein for requirements for retaining FA status. Quality (philosophy) needs a more clear explanation. Socratic dialogues could do with some tidying and clarification. See the talk page for one suggested change. Problem of universals: The introductory definition is (perhaps) fixed. But, the article is poor. Check out the German version. Teleology: the article is shallow and inconsistent. Existentialism: the quality of this article varies wildly and is in desperate need of expert attention. Star of Sophia Vote for or nominate someone you think is deserving! Analytic_philosophy This is a very major topic, but still has several sections which are stubs, and several topics which are not covered. Inverse (logic) This article makes me wish that there were a fail grade on the quality scale. Someone should rewrite it. Vote | Larry's Text | stubs | edit this list | discuss these tasks | Category:Philosophy | Portal:Philosophy | RFC | Deletion | Requested articles | Noticeboard | Discussion

"spetey" is Steve Petersen; he makes occasional edits of pages but is hardly an expert on Wikipedia format, etiquette, etc., so please forgive him any infelicities.

--Spetey 23:15, 8 November 2007 (UTC)