Talk:Speakerboxxx/The Love Below

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale.
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

I'm surprised this article doesn't have an infobox or a picture. Ground 22:30, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Man, if you knew about it then you should have done it. I wasted my 10 minutes just to put the basic layout and album cover..shh... :) --Anonymous Cow 02:54, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] <^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>

[edit] "as Andre 3000 makes no attempts to deny, to get laid." ?

Why is this here and what does it mean? Its in the beginning of the article in the 2nd paragraph. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.15.117.237 (talk) 01:16, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Best Selling Rap Album of All Time

According to this list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_albums_in_the_United_States this album appears to be the best selling Rap Album in American history. Can anyone confirm this? This fact would certainly seem worthy of being mentioned in the article.

That list has 2pac listd as selling more than Outkast. 143.166.255.57 16:01, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Hey Ya.jpg

Image:Hey Ya.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Why is the 'Critical Reaction' section of this all about this albums charting and not about "critics received this well or were outraged" or something along those lines? --Rhearnct 18:55, 25 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Separate Articles?

I believe Speakerboxxx and The Love Below deserve their own articles: they are entirely different kettles of fish, and IMO this article is a tad lacking. There is no description of the themes, or especially the running thread of The Love Below. Indeed, I would refer to it as a concept album. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.188.43.237 (talk) 20:04, 7 December 2007 (UTC)


I agree with this comment, I came to the page expecting a more in-depth discussion of (in particular) Andre3000's approach to writing his second album, theories, conjectures, and ideas relating to it where appropriate. The discs should be considered seperate, as they were written seperately, and intended that way originally. Jcook5 (talk) 21:02, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Outkast history

Outkast was a great 2 man band.Media:Outkast.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.204.51.138 (talk) 16:35, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Outkast sucks

Outkast is some garbage .They smell like bowoo yeah.They'er movie"Idewild" was stupid! They neck smell like coolwiph!They is what I say to Outkast

[edit] Outkast sucks

Outkast is some garbage .They smell like bowoo yeah.They'er movie"Idewild" was stupid! They neck smell like coolwipe!They is what I say to Outkast —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.204.51.138 (talk) 16:40, 20 May 2008 (UTC)