User talk:Spangineer/archive06

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an archive. Do not post responses here; rather, copy the section to the current talk page and comment there.

This archive page includes discussions that occurred approximately between the dates 2006-04-17 and 2006-06-04.

Archives: 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20

[edit] DYK

Hi PFHLai, thanks for your copyedits on Chet Bitterman. Also, if I came across as rude when you said the article was on the shorter side, I apologize. It seemed to me that you were trying to say that the article did not meet the DYK requirements (you said "Please expand", which I took as meaning that the article was unacceptable in its current state). Anyway, I respect you for trying to improve the DYK standards (I try to do that all the time on FAC), but could I recommend that you change your wording somewhat so that you are clearly encouraging others to go above and beyond rather than appearing to say that their work is ineligible. Also, I'd be happy to work with you to develop consensus to raise the minimum standards; I see nothing wrong with doing that. --Spangineer^[es] (háblame) 16:26, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Hello, Spangineer. No, you weren't rude. Don't worry about it. 'Ineligible' ? Hmmm... Thanks for the tip. I'll be more careful with my comments. Yes, I'm an admin, but I rarely update the DYK template. (I'll do it when someone complains on Talk: Main Page.) I'm usually not the one who chooses which DYK candidates go on MainPage. I see what you mean. Thank you. -- PFHLai 16:50, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

I just saw your explanation on the template talk page—your reaction now makes more sense; sorry about that. --Spangineer^[es] (háblame) 18:24, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks again for reminding me about my comments on nominations. Being too curt while trying to be concise may be a bad idea. And I'd like to avoid any appearance of abuse of admin powers. Some Wikipedians are very sensitive about their contributions and can be rather easily "ticked off" for the slightest thing in a comment by an admin, or an "admin-wannabee" one irate contributor recently wrote after an AfD on his article. (WP:VAIN was mentioned a few times, and that guy probably felt he was accused of being vain. Instead of reading the long VAIN guidelines, he went on a mini-spree of vandalism and personal attacks, getting himself banned. But that's another story.....) -- PFHLai 19:15, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Quick question

Hi there,

I'm fairly new to Wikipedia, and created a page called "Kingdom Life Church Melbourne", because it was not in Wikipedia. It is a new organisation.

However, I noticed you deleted it:

19:41, 4 April 2006 Spangineer deleted "Kingdom Life Church Melbourne" (PROD)

I'm sure you had a good reason for this, but I can't find any reasons posted anywhere. Can you tell me what I did wrong? Did I put it in the wrong category?

If you could point me in the right direction, that'd be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

Visitpaul

[edit] Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Spangineer/archive06! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. AmiDaniel (Talk) 00:09, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welding GACs

I've passed one of your welding articles, but failed the other one; I think the Electrogas welding article is a bit too technical, and left a few comments on the talk page, but overall it can be fixed quickly and renominated for GA. The other one passed, again with some comments on the talk page. Hope that helps, and feel free to ask me any questions. Titoxd^{(?!? - help us)} 19:56, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Writing contest!

Dear Spangineer...

Finally getting to send you your bag-full-of-amazing-things. The welding article is still holding up splendidly.

In your bag : 1 Directmedia Wikipedia CD, 1 bag of Wikipedia paperclips, 1 mousepad, and a small assortment of books. Well, the books may come in a separate package, since many of them stayed in Germany, while your bag came with me :-) Is there a chance you can make Wikimania this year in person?

--SJ

ps - I see you joined Wikipediology at some point; also very cool.

[edit] About Cite/cite.php

I am writing you because I note in the History for cite/cite.php that you have been active recently in developing that article and I am hoping that either you can answer my question or you know someone who can.

I am a Wikipedian who has written quite a number of chemical engineering articles. I have been using <ref name=whatever>some reference</ref> to define my references and then <references/> to get them displayed in the References section.

I notice that when I use a reference only one time, the vertical arrow in the Reference section listing is very thin and spindly and hard-to-see. But when I use a reference multiple times, the vertical arrow and the accompanying superscripts (a b c ..) are quite bold and really stand out well. My question is why can't the arrow for a single-use reference look just as bold and well-defined as the arrow for a multiple-use reference?

As an aside, I must say that Cite/cite.php at [1] needs to be completely re-written by a non-computer guru so that we ordinary mortals can understand it. It is virtually incomprehensible at the moment. - mbeychok 17:49, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] EE. again...

Hi there, could you stop by and give your opinion on the pics here? Thanks -- VdSV9•♫ 10:54, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] More about cite.php's poor rendering of reference arrows

If we look at the cite.php references in Tourette syndrome, they render as daggers and straight vertical lines, and they are all bold and well defined ... but they are at 80% font size. I changed them to 100% font size and then they looked exactly like the poorly defined vertical arrows I've been seeing on my IE browser. Look at these two screen shots of the Tourette references, one is using regular 100% font size and one is using 80% font size ==> image:Tourette references 100%.jpg and ==> image:Tourette references 80%.jpg

There is no question but that the font size changes the appearance entirely! Cite.php should abandon the arrows and go back to using the caret. - mbeychok 17:06, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] TIG welding

Referring to an earlier talk exchange we had ... after reading a lot, including what you've written here on WP, I finally bought a TIG welder, 160 amp, HF start, DC only, and a 20 liter/200 bar bottle of argon gas. 160 A is quite enough for welding 8mm copper rod to 3 mm copper-nickel, so I now have what I need to build my live steam boiler. Thanks & greetings, --Janke | Talk 16:47, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Yeah, well.

I spent hours on that dratted article, I think the footnoting style in use is not very good. But hey, go ahead and do what you will with the article. I'm going to keep formatting the article in the way I think is best as I create it, I'll not revert you if that isn't the MoS though. - Ta bu shi da yu 22:48, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Spangineer, that was rude of me. I very much regret the way that this came out in text! It looks like I was attacking you, but that was not my intent. Sorry! - Ta bu shi da yu 07:34, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I need your help

I created a subcategory [[Category:Chemical Engineers]] in the [[Category:Engineer Wikipedians]]. I now realize that I should have named it [[Category:Chemical Engineer Wikipedians]] but I don't know how to change the name of a sub-category nor do I know how to delete it and start over. Can you please help me out?? Thanks in advance. I will watch for your reply here in your Talk page. - mbeychok 22:55, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

It takes an administrator (like me) to delete a page. I've taken care of it and also taken the liberty of editing your userpage to reflect the new category name. Have a good one! --Spangineer^[es] (háblame) 23:52, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks very much - mbeychok 00:01, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Request: Nuestro Himno

Hey Spangineer. I was wondering if you could review the translation of Nuestro Himno, since you have a Spanish major. Laters. --Jtalledo (talk)

[edit] List of DanceSport dances

Do I take it that you withdrew your nomination? -- ALoan (Talk) 22:21, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

It's a shame - I'd probably have supported it! --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 10:41, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] History of Burnside

Thanks for the copyedit, are you going to vote in its FAC? Cheers, michael ^talk 02:29, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Concerning the article "Krista Liles"

Hello.. I'd like to inquire as to why you deleted this entry. I'm afraid it's accurate to the person it details and has been updated to the ever changing reality.

Thank you for your interest,

Statue

[edit] US article

Hi, I added some references to previous fact templates that you've inserted, which might have explained them being "reverted." I will be helping out with the citations, as others seem to be inactive. Thanks for the help.--Ryz05 01:46, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Penn State Establishment

Thanks for your help. Greenshed 11:34, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikimania 2006!

Hey Spangineer,

Registration for Wikimania 2006 is open: Register

Interested in going? The link isn't public yet, and the single dorm rooms at $40/night are limited. I have registered, but am trying to work out the best transportation to Cambridge. Let me know, GChriss 18:07, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Trying to contact you before

Hello. I was trying to learn how to contact you before! But I didn't know how, now I do. What's it like being the head boss of this site? King Shadeed 11:46, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] VALID WELDING TRAINING

Tooling University is one of the only certified online training universitis to provide welding training programs online, would you like a free trial account, I can create you one, please revert the link back. ToolingU

17:06, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The image used in Portal:Engineering/Intro

Hi, Spangineer:

The Portal:Engineering/Intro uses . Is there an image that is more representative of the engineering field than is a wrench and screwdriver? That image makes it appear as if engineers are no more than plumbers and apartment building maintenance service men. Somewhere, there must be something more representative.

I have searched through Commons without finding anything that "grabs" me. The Portal Directory lists your name as having created the Portal:Engineering/Intro which is what led me to post this query on your Talk page. I will watch here for your response. Thanks in advance, - mbeychok 23:19, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

For example, could we use this image? --mbeychok 01:52, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you

[edit] is this public

is it? this is test? as in is it public, not anonymous —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gocat (talk • contribs)

[edit] Licensing?

Hi Spangineer, I have some Penn State photos that I want to upload to Wikimedia Commons, but I am unsure what license to use. I saw what I thought was convincing argument to multi-license, but after checking out GNU Free Documentation License, I think that might be better.

I have some aerial views of Beaver Stadium I took that might look better cropped, but I can't decide. I'd like for somebody to be able to crop them, but not to be able to create a new work that might be licensed under something not compatible with Wikipedia. I thought I would ask your opinion about it.

Also, I have a couple images I uploaded to Wikipedia that I would like to move to Wikimedia, could you point me to a page that would explain that process? Thanks, RockinRob^Talk 01:53, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, your explanation was indeed helpful. I'll put the Beaver Stadium pictures on Wikimedia sometime this weekend. I have some other pictures including a 1988 aerial view of Beaver Stadium that I will put there as well as soon as I get them scanned.

On an unrelated note, I'm working on a biography, and I have few questions about NPOV, etiquette, and article size. I've already looked over guidelines and policies, but mind if I get your opinions? I figured I'd ask before I plopped questions down on your talk page. RockinRob^Talk 17:08, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Empress Myeongseong

thanx for ending the silliness. however, do please consider the version currently locked and the anonymous editor's actions [2]. thanks again. Appleby 18:49, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mooo!

You get a cowstar for being SUPERGREAT!

--217.134.237.125 19:38, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] hello

sorry for vandalising the page i love it

[edit] Follow-up

Thanks. Here goes. First, I wanted to apologize. I was a little jealous of your IE article, and that might have been reflected on some talk pages. I took some time out to read Wikipedia articles, policies, guidelines, and to get a clue. Now I look at the IE article and appreciate how skillfully constructed it is. The way you used comments to make the refs easier to see was really clever for example.

While not actively editing for a while, I came across an article about a famous politician in my hometown, Frank Rizzo. The article is in need of improvement, and is marked for POV. I was compelled to begin researching improvements to the article, to the exclusion of most everything else.

I'm working offline on a significant re-write and expansion. Periodically, I preview it in my Sandbox, but I haven't saved it, because it's not ready. I've found sources for most of the statements, gotten rid of incorrect statements, and rewrote it to be far more neutral. I still have some more referencing to do, and a few more life events to talk about. In no particular order, problems and questions are:

• Article size: I'm getting the 30K warning now, and I still need to add in some more references in addition to content. I know 30K isn't a hard upper limit, and I'm making a real effort to make every word count. I've read WP:SIZE. I don't know if I should keep going and add everything I want into it, or treat 30K as the upper limit. It's possible that the article about the politician will be at least as large as the city article.

• POV: The version I am working on is significantly different than the present version. I know that people can check the edit history, but I'm concerned people will see the POV check template and associate it with the new version of the article. I'm not sure who would make the call the article is POV-free. The person who placed the tag, consensus, me? I don't really want to start a huge deal about it, I just want to improve the article.

• Should links to Wikiquote and Wikitionary be inline refs, footnotes, or doesn't matter?

• Are iconic photographs of a subject, those seen widely as often associated with an individual or event, permissible to use, or are they still subject to copyright?

Misc Stuff:

• I also wanted to say, I hate you for putting the idea of Wikimedia Commons in my head. :) Now I have more work to do, taking pictures, uploading them, renaming them, etc. I forgot about some of the Penn State photos I had until yesterday. I think they compliment what was already there quite well.

• There is a request to populate the category Cheerleading organizations. I think a Penn State Cheerleading article would be appropriate, and I wouldn't mind eventually writing that article. Do you think they are notable enough?

Thanks! RockinRob^Talk 02:10, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

• Hi, finally posted the Frank Rizzo article at Frank Rizzo/rewrite, please take a look at it whenever you get a chance. I was working a couple of other things and forgot about it for a while. One thing was a Penn State stub, I posted it on WP:WSS/P#Proposals, May 2006, people commented on it, and the 7 day waiting period is over. I'll post on the PSUproject page once I have the stub template wherever it is supposed to go next. Right now I have it in my Sandbox. Other questions if you don't mind:

• I've been uploading images to Commons. Some are huge (~1.7M). I can't find a restriction on size anywhere. Is there a limit?

• I've been working on Medlar Field at Lubrano Park. I figured with opening day about 2 weeks away I should flesh it out. Is there anything I have to do to get it posted as a current event on June 20? I also have enough pictures to make up a good gallery for Commons, but some of the file sizes are huge (see above), so I wasn't sure if I should post more. I walked around the perimeter and took pictures becuase you never see pictures of Medlar from the back.

• And my last question, is University Park, Pennsylvania supposed to be the article for University Park campus? The other campuses have articles, but I noticed some of the main campus building are broken out with there own articles, so I wasn't sure. Thanks. RockinRob^Talk 23:11, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: References class

Just using it on references and notes and further readings, based a very personal understanding. Is there any policy for this? Thanks --Oblivious 12:37, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Six Sigma

Hi Spangineer, you have been heavily involved with creating the Six Sigma page. Currently there is a sort of an edit war going on between two users Slocum1946 and BezLocu. Slocum keeps adding a book that he wrote and the other guy keeps removing it. Can you suggest what needs to be done in this case. Thanks ramit 13:44, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] editing assistance

Oh well, if you've de-alsoed the text, that's definitely worth a look! Tony 00:55, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vicious attacks

Hi, I noticed you had blocked User:195.229.242.54 for vandalism. After the block expired, the user started viciously attacking me, removing warnings and messing around with admin noticeboards. If you look at their contributions you'll see what I'm talking about. Thanks. Paul Cyr 18:05, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Map drawing

Hi Hlj, I saw your Battle of Gettysburg maps, and wow, I'm impressed. I'm working on an article right now that needs a map, and I was wondering if you had any pointers. How did you go about drawing it? Just copying existing maps as best you could? And then you used layers for the various components (roads, troop lines, forests, etc.)? I've never attempted to draw anything like this where precision is important, so I'm curious as to how I should go about doing this. Thanks for your time! --Spangineer[es] (háblame) 14:16, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

I usually trace maps, essentially. I copy in via JPEG or scanner and then draw over, using multiple layers, as you suggest. I use Macromedia Freehand because I happened to have a cheap copy of it, but I'd suggest you use Adobe Illustrator if you want to share work with others. My key insight was to use a tool in the program that allows you to draw a line by successively clicking on points, rather than the superfussy bezier-like drawing tools. So my rivers and roads have slight jagginess, but I work at a large scale (like 14x17in) and it's not too noticeable. Good luck. Hal Jespersen 18:49, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

I don't know of alternative programs, sorry. There certainly may be some, but I don't know. On sharing, I put the source files of my maps on my website (http://www.posix.com/CWmaps/) in case someone wants to modify/edit the PNG version that's on Wikipedia. No one has as of yet, but... Hal Jespersen 00:21, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] IIT

No, they don't teach grammer at IITs. IIT-JEE used to have English as a subject, but that was discontinued more than 20 years back. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 17:30, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

I have responded to your concerns on the FAC page. Please have a look again and suggest further improvements required by this article. Thanks, -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 18:36, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

It good to see you actually editing the article to improve it and raising actionable concerns. What puts me off most is users who just write "Oppose. Poor article" and sign off. Thankfully this article hasn't had this misfortune yet. Going to sleep now, so you will have to wait another 10 hours before seeing any more requested changes. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 21:07, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Six Sigma external links

I would like an article about Six Sigma to be considered as a link in the Six Sigma article. The author, Bill Latzko, worked directly with W. Edwards Deming and is a noted expert on the statistical methods of Walter Shewhart.

http://deming.ces.clemson.edu/pub/den/six_sig.pdf

Thanks.

Jim McKinley

Perhaps i should.:). I just figure the Millionarie page would be a good place to put it. But i wil try Wiki-quotes. Thank you.

[edit] Six Sigma article

"It is often said that a Six Sigma process produces 3.4 defective parts per million. A process that is normally distributed will have 3.4 parts per million beyond a point that is 4.5 standard deviations above the mean. A Capability Study on normally distributed data, mean 0, standard deviation 1, with an upper specification limit of 4.5 will confirm this. Some six sigma practitioners call this 4.5 sigma process a 6 sigma process by invoking the 1.5 sigma shift. This is a notion that has existed since before Motorola’s program, and which gets little acceptance from professional statisticians. Donald J. Wheeler, one of the most respected workers in statistics, dismisses it as "goofy"."

The link below is to an article by Don Wheeler that elaborates on "dismisses it as 'goofy'" :

http://www.spcpress.com/ink_pdfs/The%20Final%206%20Sigma%20Zone.pdf

[edit] Geat Work

Image:Hand with thumbs up.jpg	Great Work!    For the edits worth a hundred edits on Indian Institutes of Technology. Well done!

-Ambuj Saxena (talk) 06:53, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

BTW, you mentioned a real copyeditor Tony Sidaway. I have heard his name quite frequently in FAC circles but never actually seen his contributions in detail. If you think he will be interested as well as free, should I contact him to copyedit the article. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 07:03, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

I never said you are bad. Look above, and you will see that I find your contributions good. Anyway, I think I have misunderstood the Tony everywhere. I once saw a mention of Tony in FAC and searched for the most popular Tony in Wikipedia. Seeing the search results, I thought that Sidaway was the one being talked about. Anyway, thanks for clearing my misconception. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 12:49, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Archives

At least as I understand it, once the archive has been put online that's enough of a reliable source to use as placing it online is "publishing" that information on the web. Staxringold _talk^contribs 13:50, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WP:FAC#Georg Forster

I think I have adressed most of your objections. Please comment, and feel free to find new objections! Kusma (討論) 14:14, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Operation Auca

Hi RJ, thanks for your comments on the peer review of Operation Auca. You mentioned that a map might be useful, so I drew one and added it to the article. It doesn't specify the regions where the Huaorani lived, because they were rather nomadic, but it does help the reader get an idea of the respective locations of the places that the article mentions. If you get a chance, let me know what you think.

Nice work! Thank you. — RJH (talk) 16:05, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: DYK

That's all right! I have the template on my watchlist and noticed the update, so I thought I'd see what was on it... Spotted it, quickly edited it out :-) A few weeks ago, I managed to paste the contents of my monobook into an article, so it's easy to do. It's just as easy to fix, too. Jude (talk) 12:42, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Hey man, I didn't suggest the image as it the licensing status was unknown when I nom'd it. I was about to nominate a page I made, Tajik alphabet, but just realised I'm a day late :( - FrancisTyers 22:23, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] DYK Prince Albert

While I appreciate the note, User:Anthony.bradbury wrote the article... Shimgray | talk | 22:30, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Congratulations on the Featured Article!

I just wanted to say that I enjoyed reading Operation Auca and wanted to congratulate you on a job well-done! InvictaHOG 19:42, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Another DYK!

On June 4, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Roger Youderian, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks as always for your efforts on behalf of WP! ++Lar: t/c 22:46, 4 June 2006 (UTC)