Talk:Sources of Singapore law

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Sources of Singapore law has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
October 4, 2007 Good article nominee Listed

	Sources of Singapore law is part of SGpedians' Resources An attempt to better coordinate and organise articles related to Singapore. To participate, simply edit this page or visit our noticeboard for more info.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of October 4, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Yes, in clear and accessible prose, which is particularly important for articles in scientific fields.

2. Factually accurate?: Yes, to the extent it is sourced by links. My advice for further development would be to use more references to secondary sources, e.g. legal textbooks.

3. Broad in coverage?: Certainly looks like it. That's of course hard to tell for me as a Continental European jurist, but there are no obvious gaps.

4. Neutral point of view?: Yes.

5. Article stability? Yes.

6. Images?: Only one nonfree image, with good fair use rationale.

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. — Sandstein 06:41, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:1993-ApplicationofEnglishLawAct-titlepg.jpg

Image:1993-ApplicationofEnglishLawAct-titlepg.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:24, 27 October 2007 (UTC)